Extended boost converter boundary control law based on natural switching surfaces

This paper extends the boundary control law for conventional boost converters based on natural switching surfaces, and improves both the steady state and transient response. Additional switching zones on the normalized state plane are defined to decide switching behavior. Operation with state limitations, capacitor equivalent series resistance, and parasitic losses is examined and verified in simulation. The transient bandwidth for the load disturbance rejection and command tracking approaches the physical limits of boost converters. Simulation and experimental results are presented to illustrate the major benefits of the extended boundary control law.

[1]  K.K.S. Leung,et al.  Use of second-order switching surface in the boundary control of buck converter , 2004, 2004 IEEE 35th Annual Power Electronics Specialists Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37551).

[2]  Robert D. Lorenz,et al.  State space decoupling control design methodology for switching converters , 2010 .

[3]  K.K.S. Leung,et al.  Derivation of a second-order switching surface in the boundary control of buck converters , 2004, IEEE Power Electronics Letters.

[4]  Martin Ordonez,et al.  Normalized geometrical analysis: unified theory and derivation of natural trajectories for basic dc-dc topologies , 2013, 2013 IEEE 14th Workshop on Control and Modeling for Power Electronics (COMPEL).

[5]  M. Ordonez,et al.  Dynamic physical limits of buck converters: The T0/4 transient benchmark rule , 2013, 2013 Twenty-Eighth Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC).

[6]  J. M. Galvez,et al.  Boundary control of buck-boost converters: normalized trajectories and the Natural Switching Surface , 2012, 2012 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE).

[7]  K.K.S. Leung,et al.  A Comparative Study of the Boundary Control of Buck Converters Using First- and Second-Order Switching Surfaces -Part II: Discontinuous Conduction Mode , 2005, 2005 IEEE 36th Power Electronics Specialists Conference.

[8]  C. Bunlaksananusorn,et al.  Feedback compensation design for switched mode power supplies with a right-half plane (RHP) zero , 2004 .

[9]  Jian Sun,et al.  Large-signal averaging methods under large ripple conditions [for power convertors] , 1998, PESC 98 Record. 29th Annual IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference (Cat. No.98CH36196).

[10]  Teuvo Suntio,et al.  Dynamic Profile of Switched-Mode Converter , 2009 .

[11]  C. Q. Lee,et al.  Tracking control of buck converter using sliding-mode with adaptive hysteresis , 1995, Proceedings of PESC '95 - Power Electronics Specialist Conference.

[12]  Ting-Ting Song,et al.  Boundary Control of Boost Converters Using State-Energy Plane , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[13]  M. Marchesoni,et al.  Experimental study of a power conditioning system using sliding mode control , 1996 .

[14]  Martin Ordonez,et al.  Dynamic physical limits of boost converters: A benchmarking tool for transient performance , 2014, 2014 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE).

[15]  H. Chung,et al.  A Comparative Study of the Boundary Control of Buck Converters Using First- and Second-Order Switching Surfaces -Part I: Continuous Conduction Mode , 2005, 2005 IEEE 36th Power Electronics Specialists Conference.

[16]  M.T. Iqbal,et al.  Advanced boundary control of inverters using the natural switching surface: Normalized geometrical derivation , 2008, 2008 IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference.

[17]  J. Quaicoe,et al.  Improvements in Boundary Control of Boost Converters Using the Natural Switching Surface , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.