Robust Principal Component Algorithms for High-Order Fast-Sampled Systems

Principal component active control is an important technique for noise and vibration reduction control problems. Most existing robust analysis regarding active control systems is based on the assumption of static open-loop behaviour, whose results can be very limited in practice. More promising results, exploiting integral quadratic constraints, have been reported recently and are more accurate and reliable for practical applications. However, depending on the nature of the system, such analysis may require one to establish the feasibility of an extremely large dimensional linear matrix inequality, effectively limiting the use of the result. This paper proposes an alternative approach, using model reduction methods, in which a set of IQC multipliers are obtained in a first step and the arising frequency domain inequality being verified in a second step. This two-step partition makes the approach much less computationally demanding for many complex practical systems. A detailed rotorcraft application is provided to illustrate the benefits of the proposed approach.

[1]  Dennis R. Morgan A hierarchy of performance analysis techniques for adaptive active control of sound and vibration , 1991 .

[2]  Javad Poshtan,et al.  A new adaptive recursive RLS-based fast-array IIR filter for active noise and vibration control systems , 2011, Signal Process..

[3]  Paul Sas,et al.  ROBUST DESIGN AND ROBUST STABILITY ANALYSIS OF ACTIVE NOISE CONTROL SYSTEMS , 2001 .

[4]  A. Rantzer,et al.  System analysis via integral quadratic constraints , 1997, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[5]  Kim-Chuan Toh,et al.  Solving semidefinite-quadratic-linear programs using SDPT3 , 2003, Math. Program..

[6]  Peretz P. Friedmann,et al.  On-blade control of rotor vibration, noise, and performance: Just around the corner? The 33rd Alexander Nikolsky honorary lecture , 2014 .

[7]  M. Safonov,et al.  A Schur Method for Balanced Model Reduction , 1988, 1988 American Control Conference.

[8]  Wayne Johnson,et al.  A History of Rotorcraft Comprehensive Analyses , 2013 .

[9]  Hao Yang,et al.  Robust Principal Component Active Control for Practical Implementations , 2020 .

[10]  Ch. Kessler,et al.  Active rotor control for helicopters: motivation and survey on higher harmonic control , 2011 .

[11]  Hao Yang,et al.  Decoupled controller tuning for robust principal component active control , 2017, 2017 11th Asian Control Conference (ASCC).

[12]  Daniel L. Palumbo,et al.  A principal component feedforward algorithm for active noise control: flight test results , 2001, IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol..

[13]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Graph Implementations for Nonsmooth Convex Programs , 2008, Recent Advances in Learning and Control.

[14]  Stephen J. Elliott,et al.  Signal Processing for Active Control , 2000 .

[15]  James Christopher Garcia,et al.  Active helicopter rotor control using blade-mounted actuators , 1994 .

[16]  Michael A. Soderstrand,et al.  Adaptive heterodyne filters (AHF) for detection and attenuation of narrow band signals , 1998, Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, ICASSP '98 (Cat. No.98CH36181).

[17]  Kim-Chuan Toh,et al.  SDPT3 -- A Matlab Software Package for Semidefinite Programming , 1996 .

[18]  C. Sidney Burrus,et al.  A unified analysis of multirate and periodically time-varying digital filters , 1975 .

[19]  Yegui Xiao,et al.  A New Efficient Narrowband Active Noise Control System and its Performance Analysis , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.