Experimental power of laboratory-scale results and transferability to full-scale anaerobic digestion.

Anaerobic digestion is today internationally acknowledged as an environmentally sound process for energy and nutrient recovery from organic wastes, and it is the dominant sludge treatment technology in most countries' wastewater treatment plants. Laboratory- or pilot-scale experiments are commonly used as a first step to investigate the potential of new ideas or to confirm research hypothesis before confirmation in full-scale. The objectives of this study were to investigate transferability of methane yield assessments between laboratory- and full-scale, and to compare the influence of experimental uncertainties on experimental power in parallel continuous digester experiments for the two scales. Both batch experiment data (used in a simple equation), as well as continuous laboratory experiments, could be used to predict full-scale methane yield with a high accuracy (<5% difference). Full-scale digesters significantly outperformed hand-fed laboratory digesters in terms of experimental power regarding relative differences in methane yield between two digesters operated in parallel. However, to justify costly long-term continuous laboratory-scale experiments with sufficient experimental power and potentially high transferability, resources also have to be allocated to measures that ensure a high data quality from full-scale reference facilities.

[1]  Konrad Koch,et al.  Co-digestion of food waste in a municipal wastewater treatment plant: Comparison of batch tests and full-scale experiences. , 2016, Waste management.

[2]  Kim H. Esbensen,et al.  Process Sampling (Theory of Sampling, TOS) - the Missing Link in Process Analytical Technology (PAT) , 2010 .

[3]  Konrad Koch,et al.  Influence of headspace flushing on methane production in Biochemical Methane Potential (BMP) tests. , 2015, Bioresource technology.

[4]  Willy Verstraete,et al.  Repeated pulse feeding induces functional stability in anaerobic digestion , 2013, Microbial biotechnology.

[5]  Konrad Koch,et al.  Towards a standardization of biomethane potential tests. , 2016, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[6]  Irini Angelidaki,et al.  Anaerobic digestion model No. 1 (ADM1) , 2002 .

[7]  Silvia Fiore,et al.  Scale-up evaluation of the anaerobic digestion of food-processing industrial wastes , 2016 .

[8]  Ulf Jeppsson,et al.  Modelling anaerobic co-digestion in Benchmark Simulation Model No. 2: Parameter estimation, substrate characterisation and plant-wide integration. , 2016, Water research.

[9]  Xavier Flores-Alsina,et al.  Mathematical modelling of anaerobic digestion processes: applications and future needs , 2015, Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology.

[10]  J. Jansen,et al.  Sustainable Biogas Production in Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants , 2015 .

[11]  H. Siegrist,et al.  The IWA Anaerobic Digestion Model No 1 (ADM1). , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[12]  A. Guwy,et al.  Defining the biomethane potential (BMP) of solid organic wastes and energy crops: a proposed protocol for batch assays. , 2009, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[13]  John T. Novak,et al.  Changes in Dewatering Properties Between the Thermophilic and Mesophilic Stages in Temperature‐Phased Anaerobic Digestion Systems , 2001 .

[14]  Silvia Fiore,et al.  Scale effect of anaerobic digestion tests in fed-batch and semi-continuous mode for the technical and economic feasibility of a full scale digester. , 2015, Bioresource technology.

[15]  D J Batstone,et al.  Estimation of hydrolysis parameters in full-scale anerobic digesters. , 2009, Biotechnology and bioengineering.