Cooperative Spectrum Sensing Over Weibull and Hoyt Fading Channels using Centralized and Distributed Schemes

Multipath fading, hidden terminal and shadowing are problems faced by users in non-cooperative type spectrum sensing techniques. A solution to this problem is Cooperative Spectrum Sensing (CSS) technique. CSS allows users to collaborate to perform spectrum sensing which may be managed by a common receiver. Further, it has two categories Distributed CSS (DCSS) and Centralized CSS (CCSS). In this paper these two schemes are compared with each other and different fusion rules are applied over them. Mathematical formulas for detection probability (Pd) of two fading channels namely Weibull and Hoyt are shown and further different fusion rules are applied on cluster-based CSS to explore the performance of centralized and distributed CSS. This concept has been earlier used for the conventional fading channels i.e. Rayleigh, Rician, Nakagami-m. In this paper results for cluster-based CSS are examined for comparatively lesser studied Weibull and Hoyt fading channels. It is noticed for different fusion rules, Weibull fading channel generates better performance as compared to Hoyt fading channel. This paper focuses on the implementation of four different fusion rules such as AND-AND, AND-OR, OR-AND along with centralized AND for these two fading channels. Results have shown that at SNR<5dB Weibull fading channel attains a higher probability of detection (Pd) than the Hoyt fading channel for all four fusion rules. It is noticed that the slope of the curve for Hoyt fading channel is steep as compared to Weibull fading channel and reaches to 0.9 Pd at SNR>5dB for OR-AND and AND-OR rule, while with these fusion rules, Weibull fading channel attains 0.9 Pd at SNR less than 0dB. OR-AND fusion rule gives the best result amongst all 4 fusion rules for both the channels.

[1]  Mansi S. Subhedar,et al.  SPECTRUM SENSING TECHNIQUES IN COGNITIVE RADIO NETWORKS : A SURVEY , 2011 .

[2]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  Cooperative Sensing With Imperfect Reporting Channels: Hard Decisions or Soft Decisions? , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[3]  Keqiu Li,et al.  Utility-Based Cooperative Spectrum Sensing Scheduling in Cognitive Radio Networks , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[4]  Girraj Sharma,et al.  Performance comparison of centralised and distributed CSS over fading channels in cognitive radio , 2017 .

[5]  Dayan A. Guimarães,et al.  Cooperative Spectrum Sensing with Coded and Uncoded Decision Fusion under Correlated Shadowed Fading Report Channels , 2018, Sensors.

[6]  Sanjay Dhar Roy,et al.  Detection performance of cooperative spectrum sensing with hard decision fusion in fading channels , 2016 .

[7]  Gustavo Gasaneo,et al.  Derivatives of any order of the confluent hypergeometric function F11(a,b,z) with respect to the parameter a or b , 2008 .

[8]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Cluster-Based Cooperative Spectrum Sensing in Cognitive Radio Systems , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[9]  Mikko Valkama,et al.  Energy detection sensing of unknown signals over Weibull fading channels , 2013, 2013 International Conference on Advanced Technologies for Communications (ATC 2013).

[10]  M. Mehdawi,et al.  Survey : A Comparison of Spectrum Sensing Techniques in Cognitive Radio , .

[11]  Nada Golmie,et al.  Centralized Cooperative Directional Spectrum Sensing for Cognitive Radio Networks , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[12]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Cooperative spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks: A survey , 2011, Phys. Commun..

[13]  Dong-Jun Lee,et al.  Adaptive Random Access for Cooperative Spectrum Sensing in Cognitive Radio Networks , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[14]  Wenqing Chen,et al.  Cluster-Based Energy Efficient Cooperative Spectrum Sensing in Cognitive Radios , 2009, 2009 5th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing.