A method to optimize the processing algorithm of a computed radiography system for chest radiography.

A test methodology using an anthropomorphic-equivalent chest phantom is described for the optimization of the Agfa computed radiography "MUSICA" processing algorithm for chest radiography. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in the lung, heart and diaphragm regions of the phantom, and the "system modulation transfer function" (sMTF) in the lung region, were measured using test tools embedded in the phantom. Using these parameters the MUSICA processing algorithm was optimized with respect to low-contrast detectability and spatial resolution. Two optimum "MUSICA parameter sets" were derived respectively for maximizing the CNR and sMTF in each region of the phantom. Further work is required to find the relative importance of low-contrast detectability and spatial resolution in chest images, from which the definitive optimum MUSICA parameter set can then be derived. Prior to this further work, a compromised optimum MUSICA parameter set was applied to a range of clinical images. A group of experienced image evaluators scored these images alongside images produced from the same radiographs using the MUSICA parameter set in clinical use at the time. The compromised optimum MUSICA parameter set was shown to produce measurably better images.

[1]  J Vassileva,et al.  A phantom for dose-image quality optimization in chest radiography. , 2002, The British journal of radiology.

[2]  H. Carty,et al.  Digital radiography in paediatrics: radiation dose considerations and magnitude of possible dose reduction. , 1998, The British journal of radiology.

[3]  Thomas Mertelmeier,et al.  Why and how is soft copy reading possible in clinical practice? , 1999, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[4]  Anders Tingberg,et al.  Search for optimal tube voltage for image plate radiography , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[5]  Peter Smeets,et al.  Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  W. Leitz,et al.  Assessment and comparison of chest radiography techniques in the United States and Sweden. , 1990, The British journal of radiology.

[7]  Ying Chen,et al.  Intercomparison of methods for image quality characterization. I. Modulation transfer function. , 2006, Medical physics.

[8]  Boris Radeleff,et al.  Comparing image quality of flat-panel chest radiography with storage phosphor radiography and film-screen radiography. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  E. Samei,et al.  A method for measuring the presampled MTF of digital radiographic systems using an edge test device. , 1998, Medical physics.

[10]  T. R. Fewell,et al.  Beam quality independent attenuation phantom for estimating patient exposure from x-ray automatic exposure controlled chest examinations. , 1984, Medical physics.

[11]  Pieter Vuylsteke,et al.  Multiscale image contrast amplification (MUSICA) , 1994, Medical Imaging.

[12]  P. Shrimpton,et al.  The tissue-equivalence of the Alderson Rando anthropomorphic phantom for x-rays of diagnostic qualities. , 1981, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  U Neitzel,et al.  Selenium radiography versus storage phosphor and conventional radiography in the detection of simulated chest lesions. , 1996, Radiology.

[14]  G. Boreman.  Modulation Transfer Function , 1998 .

[15]  Steven K. Onishi,et al.  High-resolution imager for digital mammography: physical characterization of a prototype sensor , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  O. Suleiman,et al.  Results of a nationwide survey of chest radiography: comparison with results of a previous study. , 2000, Radiology.

[17]  K. Nakamura,et al.  Optimal beam quality for chest computed radiography. , 1996, Investigative radiology.

[18]  W D Foley,et al.  Digital radiography of the chest: promises and problems [publihsed erratum appears in AJR 1988 Sep;151(3):preceding 641]. , 1988, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  C E Ravin,et al.  Threshold perception performance with computed and screen-film radiography: implications for chest radiography. , 1992, Radiology.

[20]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  The Laplacian Pyramid as a Compact Image Code , 1983, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[21]  D S Evans,et al.  Investigation of optimum energies for chest imaging using film-screen and computed radiography. , 2005, The British journal of radiology.

[22]  G G Cox,et al.  Comparison of the low-contrast detectability of a screen-film system and third generation computed radiography. , 1994, Medical physics.

[23]  C E Ravin,et al.  Digital chest radiography with photostimulable storage phosphors: signal-to-noise ratio as a function of kilovoltage with matched exposure risk. , 1993, Radiology.