Meso-structural study of concrete fracture using interface elements. I: numerical model and tensile behavior

A recently developed FE-based mesostructural model for the mechanical behavior of heterogeneous quasi-brittle materials is used systematically to analyze concrete specimens in 2D. The numerical model is based on the use of zero-thickness interface elements equipped with a normal-shear traction-separation constitutive law representing non-linear fracture, which may be considered a mixed-mode generalization of Hillerborg’s “Fictitious Crack Model.” Specimens with 4 × 4 and 6 × 6 arrays of aggregates are discretized into finite elements. Interface elements are inserted along the main lines in the mesh, representing potential crack lines. The calculations presented in this paper consist of uniaxial tension loading, and the continuum elements themselves are assumed to behave as linear elastic. In this way, the influence of various aspects of the heterogeneous geometry and interface parameters on the overall specimen response has been investigated. These aspects are aggregate volume fraction, type of arrangement and geometry, interface layout, and values of the crack model parameters chosen for both the aggregate-aggregate and matrix-aggregate interfaces. The results show a good qualitative agreement with experimental observations and illustrate the capabilities of the model. In the companion second part of the paper, the model is used to represent other loading states such as uniaxial compression, Brazilian test, or biaxial loading.

[1]  Hans W. Reinhardt,et al.  Influence of aggregate size on fracture mechanics parameters of concrete , 1987 .

[2]  A. Gens,et al.  AN INTERFACE ELEMENT FORMULATION FOR THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL-REINFORCEMENT INTERACTION , 1989 .

[3]  P. Petersson Crack growth and development of fracture zones in plain concrete and similar materials , 1981 .

[4]  Byung Hwan Oh,et al.  Microplane Model for Fracture Analysis of Concrete Structures , 1983 .

[5]  R. A. Vonk,et al.  Softening of concrete loaded in compression , 1992 .

[6]  M. Ortiz,et al.  Computational modelling of impact damage in brittle materials , 1996 .

[7]  J. Bolander,et al.  Fracture analyses using spring networks with random geometry , 1998 .

[8]  Antonio Aguado,et al.  MICROSTRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF CONCRETE FRACTURE USING INTERFACE ELEMENTS , 2000 .

[9]  Gianluca Cusatis,et al.  Confinement-Shear Lattice Model for Concrete Damage in Tension and Compression: I. Theory , 2002 .

[10]  M. Crisfield Non-Linear Finite Element Analysis of Solids and Structures, Essentials , 1997 .

[11]  E. Garboczi,et al.  New method for simulating fracture using an elastically uniform random geometry lattice , 1996 .

[12]  Gianluca Cusatis,et al.  CONFINEMENT-SHEAR LATTICE MODEL FOR CONCRETE DAMAGE IN TENSION AND COMPRESSION: II. COMPUTATION AND VALIDATION , 2003 .

[13]  J. V. van Mier,et al.  Micromechanical Analysis of Fracture of Concrete , 1992 .

[14]  Ignacio Carol,et al.  3D meso-structural analysis of concrete specimens under uniaxial tension , 2006 .

[15]  J. Mier Fracture Processes of Concrete , 1997 .

[16]  J. Rots Computational modeling of concrete fracture , 1988 .

[17]  H.E.J.G. Schlangen,et al.  Experimental and numerical analysis of fracture processes in concrete : proefschrift , 1993 .

[18]  D. Hordijk TENSILE AND TENSILE FATIGUE BEHAVIOUR OF CONCRETE; EXPERIMENTS, MODELLING AND ANALYSES , 1992 .

[19]  Cv Clemens Verhoosel,et al.  Non-Linear Finite Element Analysis of Solids and Structures , 1991 .

[20]  P. E. Roelfstra,et al.  Le béton numérique , 1985 .

[21]  John E. Bolander,et al.  Structural Concrete Analysis Using Rigid‐Body‐Spring Networks , 2000 .

[22]  M. Tabbara,et al.  RANDOM PARTICLE MODEL FOR FRACTURE OF AGGREGATE OR FIBER COMPOSITES , 1990 .

[23]  I. Carol,et al.  Micromechanical analysis of quasi‐brittle materials using fracture‐based interface elements , 2001 .

[24]  M. Jinisek PARTICLE MODEL FOR FRACTURE AND STATISTICAL MICRO-MACRO CORRELATION OF MATERIAL CONSTANTS , 1995 .

[25]  D. Hordijk Local approach to fatigue of concrete , 1991 .

[26]  Ignacio Carol,et al.  NORMAL/SHEAR CRACKING MODEL: APPLICATION TO DISCRETE CRACK ANALYSIS , 1997 .

[27]  M. J. N. Priestley,et al.  Long term observations of concrete structures analysis of temperature gradient effects , 1985 .

[28]  E. Brühwiler,et al.  Fracture energy and strain softening of concrete as determined by means of compact tension specimens , 1988 .

[29]  A. Hillerborg,et al.  Analysis of crack formation and crack growth in concrete by means of fracture mechanics and finite elements , 1976 .

[30]  Jose Couto Marques,et al.  Stress computation in elastoplasticity , 1984 .

[31]  Zdenek P. Bazant,et al.  Interface element modeling of fracture in aggregate composites , 1987 .

[32]  Ignacio Carol,et al.  A meso‐level approach to the 3D numerical analysis of cracking and fracture of concrete materials , 2006 .

[33]  M. Hassanzadeh Determination of fracture zone properties in mixed mode I and II , 1990 .

[34]  J. G. Rots,et al.  Fracture Processes in Concrete. Rock and Ceramics , 1991 .