High Throughput Field Phenotyping of Wheat Plant Height and Growth Rate in Field Plot Trials Using UAV Based Remote Sensing

There is a growing need to increase global crop yields, whilst minimising use of resources such as land, fertilisers and water. Agricultural researchers use ground-based observations to identify, select and develop crops with favourable genotypes and phenotypes; however, the ability to collect rapid, high quality and high volume phenotypic data in open fields is restricting this. This study develops and assesses a method for deriving crop height and growth rate rapidly from multi-temporal, very high spatial resolution (1 cm/pixel), 3D digital surface models of crop field trials produced via Structure from Motion (SfM) photogrammetry using aerial imagery collected through repeated campaigns flying an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) with a mounted Red Green Blue (RGB) camera. We compare UAV SfM modelled crop heights to those derived from terrestrial laser scanner (TLS) and to the standard field measurement of crop height conducted using a 2 m rule. The most accurate UAV-derived surface model and the TLS both achieve a Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) of 0.03 m compared to the existing manual 2 m rule method. The optimised UAV method was then applied to the growing season of a winter wheat field phenotyping experiment containing 25 different varieties grown in 27 m2 plots and subject to four different nitrogen fertiliser treatments. Accuracy assessments at different stages of crop growth produced consistently low RMSE values (0.07, 0.02 and 0.03 m for May, June and July, respectively), enabling crop growth rate to be derived from differencing of the multi-temporal surface models. We find growth rates range from −13 mm/day to 17 mm/day. Our results clearly display the impact of variable nitrogen fertiliser rates on crop growth. Digital surface models produced provide a novel spatial mapping of crop height variation both at the field scale and also within individual plots. This study proves UAV based SfM has the potential to become a new standard for high-throughput phenotyping of in-field crop heights.

[1]  David Bonnett,et al.  Phenotyping transgenic wheat for drought resistance. , 2012, Journal of experimental botany.

[2]  Stuart I. Granshaw,et al.  Photogrammetric Terminology: Third Edition , 2016 .

[3]  Diego González-Aguilera,et al.  Image-Based Modelling from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Photogrammetry: An Effective, Low-Cost Tool for Archaeological Applications , 2015 .

[4]  S. Wich,et al.  Dawn of Drone Ecology: Low-Cost Autonomous Aerial Vehicles for Conservation , 2012 .

[5]  Y. Miao,et al.  Very high resolution crop surface models (CSMs) from UAV-based stereo images for rice growth monitoring In Northeast China , 2013 .

[6]  Mathias Rothermel,et al.  DENSE MULTIPLE STEREO MATCHING OF HIGHLY OVERLAPPING UAV IMAGERY , 2012 .

[7]  J. Zadoks.  A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals , 1974 .

[8]  Dirk Hoffmeister,et al.  A Comparison of UAV- and TLS-derived Plant Height for Crop Monitoring: Using Polygon Grids for the Analysis of Crop Surface Models (CSMs) , 2016 .

[9]  F. Visser,et al.  Quantifying submerged fluvial topography using hyperspatial resolution UAS imagery and structure from motion photogrammetry , 2015 .

[10]  Sagi Filin,et al.  Estimating plant growth parameters using an energy minimization-based stereovision model , 2013 .

[11]  Juliane Bendig,et al.  UAV-based Imaging for Multi-Temporal, very high Resolution Crop Surface Models to monitor Crop Growth Variability , 2013 .

[12]  J. Flexas,et al.  UAVs challenge to assess water stress for sustainable agriculture , 2015 .

[13]  Simon Bennertz,et al.  Combining UAV-based plant height from crop surface models, visible, and near infrared vegetation indices for biomass monitoring in barley , 2015, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[14]  Daniel Moura,et al.  In-field crop row phenotyping from 3D modeling performed using Structure from Motion , 2015, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[15]  Malcolm J. Hawkesford,et al.  Nitrogen efficiency of wheat: Genotypic and environmental variation and prospects for improvement , 2010 .

[16]  Andreas Burkart,et al.  Generating 3D hyperspectral information with lightweight UAV snapshot cameras for vegetation monitoring: From camera calibration to quality assurance , 2015 .

[17]  Heikki Saari,et al.  Processing and Assessment of Spectrometric, Stereoscopic Imagery Collected Using a Lightweight UAV Spectral Camera for Precision Agriculture , 2013, Remote. Sens..

[18]  P. Reich,et al.  A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide , 2003 .

[19]  P. Reich,et al.  New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide , 2013 .

[20]  T. Schmugge,et al.  Research Article: Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles for Rangelands: Current Applications and Future Potentials , 2006 .

[21]  A. Greenberg,et al.  Next-generation phenotyping: requirements and strategies for enhancing our understanding of genotype–phenotype relationships and its relevance to crop improvement , 2013, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[22]  Sudhanshu Sekhar Panda,et al.  Application of Vegetation Indices for Agricultural Crop Yield Prediction Using Neural Network Techniques , 2010, Remote. Sens..

[23]  Qiang Cao,et al.  Multitemporal crop surface models: accurate plant height measurement and biomass estimation with terrestrial laser scanning in paddy rice , 2014 .

[24]  F. Baret,et al.  A semi-automatic system for high throughput phenotyping wheat cultivars in-field conditions: description and first results. , 2012, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[25]  Arko Lucieer,et al.  An Automated Technique for Generating Georectified Mosaics from Ultra-High Resolution Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Imagery, Based on Structure from Motion (SfM) Point Clouds , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[26]  Pablo J. Zarco-Tejada,et al.  Spatial Resolution Effects on Chlorophyll Fluorescence Retrieval in a Heterogeneous Canopy Using Hyperspectral Imagery and Radiative Transfer Simulation , 2013, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[27]  Georg Bareth,et al.  NON-DESTRUCTIVE MONITORING OF RICE BY HYPERSPECTRAL IN-FIELD SPECTROMETRY AND UAV-BASED REMOTE SENSING: CASE STUDY OF FIELD-GROWN RICE IN NORTH RHINE-WESTPHALIA, GERMANY , 2016 .

[28]  Pablo J. Zarco-Tejada,et al.  Thermal and Narrowband Multispectral Remote Sensing for Vegetation Monitoring From an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[29]  M. Westoby,et al.  ‘Structure-from-Motion’ photogrammetry: A low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications , 2012 .

[30]  Arko Lucieer,et al.  Time Series Analysis of Landslide Dynamics Using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[31]  M. Hawkesford,et al.  Field Scanalyzer: An automated robotic field phenotyping platform for detailed crop monitoring. , 2016, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[32]  Jose A. Jiménez-Berni,et al.  Pheno-Copter: A Low-Altitude, Autonomous Remote-Sensing Robotic Helicopter for High-Throughput Field-Based Phenotyping , 2014 .

[33]  A. Viguria,et al.  Evaluating the accuracy of DEM generation algorithms from UAV imagery , 2013 .

[34]  Gottfried Konecny.  Geoinformation: Remote Sensing, Photogrammetry and Geographic Information Systems, Second Edition , 2014 .

[35]  C. Nellemann,et al.  The environmental food crisis : the environment's role in averting future food crises , 2009 .

[36]  S. Robson,et al.  Mitigating systematic error in topographic models derived from UAV and ground‐based image networks , 2014 .

[37]  F. Nex,et al.  UAV for 3D mapping applications: a review , 2014 .

[38]  J. Araus,et al.  Field high-throughput phenotyping: the new crop breeding frontier. , 2014, Trends in plant science.

[39]  S. Sankaran,et al.  Low-altitude, high-resolution aerial imaging systems for row and field crop phenotyping: A review , 2015 .

[40]  Jeffrey W. White,et al.  Development and evaluation of a field-based high-throughput phenotyping platform. , 2013, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[41]  H. Jones,et al.  Infra-Red Thermography as a High-Throughput Tool for Field Phenotyping , 2014 .

[42]  D. R. Tottman.  The decimal code for the growth stages of cereals, with illustrations , 1987 .

[43]  Albert Rango,et al.  Texture and Scale in Object-Based Analysis of Subdecimeter Resolution Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Imagery , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[44]  Johanna Link,et al.  Combined Spectral and Spatial Modeling of Corn Yield Based on Aerial Images and Crop Surface Models Acquired with an Unmanned Aircraft System , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[45]  Pablo J. Zarco-Tejada,et al.  Remote Sensing of Thermal Water Stress Indicators in Peach , 2012 .

[46]  Konrad Schindler,et al.  DETERMINATION OF THE UAV POSITION BY AUTOMATIC PROCESSING OF THERMAL IMAGES , 2012 .

[47]  M. P. Reynolds,et al.  Physiological breeding II: a field guide to wheat phenotyping , 2012 .