Robustness of interactive intensity thresholding based breast density assessment in MR-mammography

The efficiency of breast density assessment using interactive intensity thresholding applied to intensity uniformity corrected T1-weighted MR images is investigated for 20 healthy women who attended the UK multi-centre study of MRI screening for breast cancer. Mammographic density is estimated on the medial-lateral oblique X-ray mammograms using CUMULUS. MR density assessment is performed using both high and low-resolution T1-weighted images. The left and the right breast regions anterior to the pectoral muscle were segmented on these images using active contouring. For each region, intensity uniformities were corrected using proton density images and a user selected uniformity factor. An interactively selected threshold is applied to the corrected images to detect fibrogulandular tissue. The breast density is calculated as the ratio of the classified fibroglandular tissue to the segmented breast volume. There is no systematic difference, good consistency and a high correlation between the left and the right breast densities estimated from X-ray mammograms and the high and low-resolution MR images. The correlation is the highest and the consistency is the best for the low-resolution MR measurements (r=0.976, MeanAbsoluteDifference = 2.12%). Mean breast densities calculated over the left and the right breasts on high and low-resolution MR images are highly correlated with mammographic density (r=0.923 and 0.903, respectively) but are approximately 50% lower. Interactive intensity thresholding of T1-weighted MR images provides an easy, reproducible and reliable way to assess breast density. High and low-resolution measurements are both highly correlated with the mammographic density but the latter requires less processing and acquisition time.

[1]  A. McTiernan,et al.  Assessing individual risk for breast cancer: risky business. , 1997, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[2]  N. Boyd,et al.  Analysis of mammographic density and breast cancer risk from digitized mammograms. , 1998, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[3]  B. Chapman,et al.  Automated assessment of the composition of breast tissue revealed on tissue-thickness-corrected mammography. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Correlation between mammographic density and volumetric fibroglandular tissue estimated on breast MR images. , 2004, Medical physics.

[5]  A R Padhani,et al.  Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS) , 2005, The Lancet.

[6]  Raymond C Boston,et al.  Estimation of the content of fat and parenchyma in breast tissue using MRI T1 histograms and phantoms. , 2005, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[7]  Andrew Shenton,et al.  BRCA1, BRCA2 and TP53 mutations in very early-onset breast cancer with associated risks to relatives. , 2006, European journal of cancer.

[8]  V. McCormack,et al.  Breast Density and Parenchymal Patterns as Markers of Breast Cancer Risk: A Meta-analysis , 2006, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[9]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  A framework for evaluating image segmentation algorithms , 2006, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[10]  Michael Khazen,et al.  A Pilot Study of Compositional Analysis of the Breast and Estimation of Breast Mammographic Density Using Three-Dimensional T1-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2008, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[11]  N. Boyd,et al.  Breast-tissue composition and other risk factors for breast cancer in young women: a cross-sectional study. , 2009, The Lancet. Oncology.

[12]  Junaed Sattar Snakes , Shapes and Gradient Vector Flow , 2022 .