Activation and repression of transcription by the gap proteins hunchback and Krüppel in cultured Drosophila cells.

We have studied the ability of the Drosophila gap proteins Krüppel and hunchback to function as transcriptional regulators in cultured cells. Both proteins bind to specific sites in a 100-bp DNA fragment located upstream of the segment polarity gene engrailed, which also contains functional binding sites for a number of homeo box proteins. The hunchback protein is a strikingly concentration-dependent activator of transcription, capable of functioning both by itself and also synergistically with the pair-rule proteins fushi tarazu and paired. In contrast, Krüppel is a transcriptional repressor that can block transcription induced either by hunchback or by several different homeo box proteins. While repression of the homeo box protein activators requires a Krüppel-binding site on the DNA, repression of hunchback can occur efficiently in the absence of a Krüppel-binding site. We discuss the possible molecular mechanisms underlying these activities, as well as the potential significance of these results with respect to segmentation in Drosophila.

[1]  M. Karin,et al.  Transcriptional interference between c-Jun and the glucocorticoid receptor: Mutual inhibition of DNA binding due to direct protein-protein interaction , 1990, Cell.

[2]  Stephan Gebel,et al.  Antitumor promotion and antiinflammation: Down-modulation of AP-1 (Fos/Jun) activity by glucocorticoid hormone , 1990, Cell.

[3]  S. Kliewer,et al.  Functional antagonism between oncoprotein c-Jun and the glucocorticoid receptor , 1990, Cell.

[4]  Michael R. Green,et al.  Evidence for interaction of different eukaryotic transcriptional activators with distinct cellular targets , 1990, Nature.

[5]  Jonathan D. Licht,et al.  Drosophila Krüppel protein is a transcriptional represser , 1990, Nature.

[6]  Robert Tjian,et al.  Mechanism of transcriptional activation by Sp1: Evidence for coactivators , 1990, Cell.

[7]  M. Horikoshi,et al.  Binding site-dependent direct activation and repression of in vitro transcription by Drosophila homeodomain proteins , 1990, Cell.

[8]  Michael J. Pankratz,et al.  Gradients of Krüppel and knirps gene products direct pair-rule gene stripe patterning in the posterior region of the drosophila embryo , 1990, Cell.

[9]  Sean B. Carroll,et al.  Zebra patterns in fly embryos: Activation of stripes or repression of interstripes? , 1990, Cell.

[10]  C. Glass,et al.  Positive and negative regulation of gene transcription by a retinoic acid-thyroid hormone receptor heterodimer , 1989, Cell.

[11]  M. Levine,et al.  Transcriptional repression of eukaryotic promoters , 1989, Cell.

[12]  H. Jäckle,et al.  Analysis of maternal effect mutant combinations elucidates regulation and function of the overlap of hunchback and Krüppel gene expression in the Drosophila blastoderm embryo. , 1989, Development.

[13]  S. Carroll,et al.  The zygotic control of Drosophila pair-rule gene expression. II. Spatial repression by gap and pair-rule gene products. , 1989, Development.

[14]  P. O’Farrell,et al.  Evolutionary conservation of homeodomain-binding sites and other sequences upstream and within the major transcription unit of the Drosophila segmentation gene engrailed , 1989, Molecular and cellular biology.

[15]  Claude Desplan,et al.  The products of the Drosophila gap genes hunchback and Krüppel bind to the hunchback promoters , 1989, Nature.

[16]  Michael Levine,et al.  Sequence-specific DNA-binding activities of the gap proteins encoded by hunchback and Krüppel in Drosophila , 1989, Nature.

[17]  H. Jäckle,et al.  Krüppel requirement for knirps enhancement reflects overlapping gap gene activities in the Drosophila embryo , 1989, Nature.

[18]  R. Tjian,et al.  A purified Drosophila homeodomain protein represses transcription in vitro , 1989, Cell.

[19]  Wolfgang Driever,et al.  Determination of spatial domains of zygotic gene expression in the Drosophila embryo by the affinity of binding sites for the bicoid morphogen , 1989, Nature.

[20]  K. Struhl,et al.  The gradient morphogen bicoid is a concentration-dependent transcriptional activator , 1989, Cell.

[21]  M. Scott,et al.  Transcriptional activation by the Antennapedia and fushi tarazu proteins in cultured Drosophila cells , 1989, Cell.

[22]  M. Krasnow,et al.  Transcriptional activation and repression by Ultrabithorax proteins in cultured Drosophila cells , 1989, Cell.

[23]  Tom Maniatis,et al.  Early and late periodic patterns of even skipped expression are controlled by distinct regulatory elements that respond to different spatial cues , 1989, Cell.

[24]  G. Struhl,et al.  Differing strategies for organizing anterior and posterior body pattern in Drosophila embryos , 1989, Nature.

[25]  M. Levine,et al.  Autoregulatory and gap gene response elements of the even‐skipped promoter of Drosophila. , 1989, The EMBO journal.

[26]  M P Weir,et al.  Patterns of engrailed protein in early Drosophila embryos. , 1989, Development.

[27]  M. Levine,et al.  Synergistic activation and repression of transcription by Drosophila homeobox proteins , 1989, Cell.

[28]  C. Ingles,et al.  The Drosophila fushi tarazu polypeptide is a DNA-binding transcriptional activator in yeast cells , 1989, Nature.

[29]  Wolfgang Driever,et al.  The bicoid protein is a positive regulator of hunchback transcription in the early Drosophila embryo , 1989, Nature.

[30]  H. Jäckle,et al.  Abdominal segmentation of the Drosophila embryo requires a hormone receptor-like protein encoded by the gap gene knirps , 1988, Nature.

[31]  M. Ptashne How eukaryotic transcriptional activators work , 1988, Nature.

[32]  P. O’Farrell,et al.  The sequence specificity of homeodomain-DNA interaction , 1988, Cell.

[33]  P. Ingham The molecular genetics of embryonic pattern formation in Drosophila , 1988, Nature.

[34]  C. Nüsslein-Volhard,et al.  The bicoid protein determines position in the Drosophila embryo in a concentration-dependent manner , 1988, Cell.

[35]  C. Nüsslein-Volhard,et al.  A gradient of bicoid protein in Drosophila embryos , 1988, Cell.

[36]  M. Levine,et al.  Divergent homeo box proteins recognize similar DNA sequences in Drosophila , 1988, Nature.

[37]  H. Jäckle,et al.  Disruption of a putative Cys–zinc interaction eliminates the biological activity of the Krüppel finger protein , 1988, Nature.

[38]  P. Ingham,et al.  Regulation of segment polarity genes in the Drosophila blastoderm by fushi tarazu and even skipped , 1988, Nature.

[39]  M. Levine,et al.  Gap genes define the limits of antennapedia and bithorax gene expression during early development in Drosophila. , 1988, The EMBO journal.

[40]  M. Levine,et al.  Molecular characterization of the zerknüllt region of the Antennapedia gene complex in Drosophila. , 1987, Genes & development.

[41]  P. O’Farrell,et al.  Establishment and refinement of segmental pattern in the Drosophila embryo: spatial control of engrailed expression by pair-rule genes. , 1987, Genes & development.

[42]  M. Frasch,et al.  Complementary patterns of even-skipped and fushi tarazu expression involve their differential regulation by a common set of segmentation genes in Drosophila. , 1987, Genes & development.

[43]  M. Akam,et al.  The molecular basis for metameric pattern in the Drosophila embryo. , 1987, Development.

[44]  Diethard Tautz,et al.  Finger protein of novel structure encoded by hunchback, a second member of the gap class of Drosophila segmentation genes , 1987, Nature.

[45]  M. Frasch,et al.  Characterization and localization of the even‐skipped protein of Drosophila. , 1987, The EMBO journal.

[46]  P. Ingham,et al.  The correct activation of Antennapedia and bithorax complex genes requires the fushi tarazu gene , 1986, Nature.

[47]  M. Noll,et al.  Structure of the segmentation gene paired and the Drosophila PRD gene set as part of a gene network , 1986, Cell.

[48]  R. Lehmann,et al.  Cross-regulatory interactions among the gap genes of Drosophila , 1986, Nature.

[49]  C. Nüsslein-Volhard,et al.  Organization of anterior pattern in the Drosophila embryo by the maternal gene bicoid , 1986, Nature.

[50]  D. Ish-Horowicz,et al.  Correlative changes in homoeotic and segmentation gene expression in Krüppel mutant embryos of Drosophila , 1986, The EMBO journal.

[51]  W. Herr,et al.  The SV40 enhancer is composed of multiple functional elements that can compensate for one another , 1986, Cell.

[52]  S. Carroll,et al.  Zygotically active genes that affect the spatial expression of the fushi tarazu segmentation gene during early Drosophila embryogenesis , 1986, Cell.

[53]  M. Wintzerith,et al.  Multiple sequence motifs are involved in SV40 enhancer function. , 1986, The EMBO journal.

[54]  P. O’Farrell,et al.  The engrailed locus of drosophila: In situ localization of transcripts reveals compartment-specific expression , 1985, Cell.

[55]  R. Roeder,et al.  Accurate transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II in a soluble extract from isolated mammalian nuclei. , 1983, Nucleic acids research.

[56]  S. Kauffman Pattern formation in the Drosophila embryo. , 1981, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[57]  H. Towbin,et al.  Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications. , 1979, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[58]  I. Schneider,et al.  Cell lines derived from late embryonic stages of Drosophila melanogaster. , 1972, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[59]  G. Olsen,et al.  Molecular and genetic organization of the antennapedia gene complex of Drosophila melanogaster. , 1990, Advances in genetics.

[60]  H. Jäckle,et al.  Structural homology of the product of the Drosophila Krüppel gene with Xenopus transcription factor IIIA , 1986, Nature.

[61]  P. O’Farrell,et al.  Spatial programming of gene expression in early Drosophila embryogenesis. , 1986, Annual review of cell biology.