Infants' perception of information along object boundaries: concavities versus convexities.

Object parts are signaled by concave discontinuities in shape contours. In seven experiments, we examined whether 5- and 6 1/2-month-olds are sensitive to concavities as special aspects of contours. Infants of both ages detected discrepant concave elements amid convex distractors but failed to discriminate convex elements among concave distractors. This discrimination asymmetry is analogous to the finding that concave targets among convex distractors pop out for adults, whereas convex targets among concave distractors do not. Thus, during infancy, as during adulthood, concavities appear to be salient regions of shape contours. The current study also found that infants' detection of concavity is impaired if the contours that define concavity and convexity are not part of closed shapes. Thus, for infants, as for adults, concavities and convexities are defined more readily in the contours of closed shapes. Taken together, the results suggest that some basic aspects of part perception from shape contours are available by at least 5 months of age.

[1]  B. Roder,et al.  Infants' Preferences for Familiarity and Novelty During the Course of Visual Processing. , 2000, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[2]  P. Quinn,et al.  Good continuation affects discrimination of visual pattern information in young infants , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  Yaoda Xu,et al.  Early computation of part structure: Evidence from visual search , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  J. Hulleman,et al.  Concavities as basic features in visual search: Evidence from search asymmetries , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  A. Treisman,et al.  Search asymmetry: a diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[6]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Attentional requirements in a ‘preattentive’ feature search task , 1997, Nature.

[7]  Robert L. Goldstone.  Learning to Perceive While Perceiving to Learn , 2003 .

[8]  R. Kimchi,et al.  Perceptual organization in vision : behavioral and neural perspectives , 2003 .

[9]  M. Kavšek.  The perception of static subjective contours in infancy. , 2002, Child development.

[10]  C Owsley,et al.  The Role of Motion in Infants' Perception of Solid Shape , 1983, Perception.

[11]  Allen Allport,et al.  Visual attention , 1989 .

[12]  P. Kellman,et al.  A theory of visual interpolation in object perception , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  F. Attneave.  Some informational aspects of visual perception. , 1954, Psychological review.

[14]  Claes von Hofsten,et al.  Emerging cognitive abilities in early infancy , 2001 .

[15]  James Elder,et al.  The effect of contour closure on the rapid discrimination of two-dimensional shapes , 1993, Vision Research.

[16]  E. W. Ames,et al.  A multifactor model of infant preferences for novel and familiar stimuli. , 1988 .

[17]  Carolyn Rovee-Collier,et al.  Progress in infancy research , 2000 .

[18]  Donald D. Hoffman,et al.  Parts of recognition , 1984, Cognition.

[19]  D. Marr,et al.  Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes , 1978, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[20]  John W. Tukey,et al.  Exploratory Data Analysis. , 1979 .

[21]  Leslie B. Cohen,et al.  Uses and misuses of habituation and related preference paradigms , 2004 .

[22]  A. Yonas,et al.  Space perception in infancy , 1987 .

[23]  Richard N Aslin,et al.  Statistical learning of new visual feature combinations by infants , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  A Yonas,et al.  Infants Perceive Spatial Structure Specified by Line Junctions , 1994, Perception.

[25]  J. Feldman,et al.  Information along contours and object boundaries. , 2005, Psychological review.

[26]  Donald D. Hoffman,et al.  Parsing silhouettes: The short-cut rule , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  Terri Gullickson,et al.  Annals of Child Development , 1995 .

[28]  I. Kovács.  Human development of perceptual organization , 2000, Vision Research.

[29]  S. Palmer.  Hierarchical structure in perceptual representation , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[30]  I. Biederman.  Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[31]  M. Arterberry,et al.  The Cradle of Knowledge: Development of Perception in Infancy , 1998 .

[32]  P Salapatek,et al.  Visual scanning of geometric figures by the human newborn. , 1968, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[33]  R. Bhatt,et al.  Face processing in infancy: developmental changes in the use of different kinds of relational information. , 2005, Child development.

[34]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[35]  James Elder,et al.  A measure of closure , 1994, Vision Research.

[36]  Scott P. Johnson.  The Development of Visual Surface Perception: Insights Into the Ontogeny of Knowledge , 2000 .

[37]  Donald D. Hoffman,et al.  Part-Based Representations of Visual Shape and Implications for Visual Cognition , 2001 .

[38]  Leslie B. Cohen,et al.  Infant perception: From sensation to cognition , 1975 .

[39]  P. Quinn,et al.  Visual pop-out in young infants: Convergent evidence and an extension , 1998 .

[40]  Donald D. Hoffman,et al.  Parts of Visual Objects: An Experimental Test of the Minima Rule , 1989, Perception.

[41]  P. Quinn,et al.  Learning Perceptual Organization in Infancy , 2005, Psychological science.

[42]  H. Pashler.  The Psychology of Attention , 1997 .

[43]  Paul C Quinn,et al.  Development of Form Similarity as a Gestalt Grouping Principle in Infancy , 2002, Psychological science.

[44]  R. Bhatt,et al.  Pictorial cues and three-dimensional information processing in early infancy. , 2001, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[45]  M. Behrmann,et al.  6 Attention and unit formation: A biased competition account of object-based attention , 2001 .

[46]  J. Colombo,et al.  Visual pop-out in infants: Evidence for preattentive search in 3- and 4-month-olds , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[47]  Donald D. Hoffman,et al.  Salience of visual parts , 1997, Cognition.

[48]  Textons, visual pop-out effects, and object recognition in infancy. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[49]  P. Quinn,et al.  Infants’ sensitivity to uniform connectedness as a cue for perceptual organization , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[50]  P. Kellman,et al.  From fragments to objects : segmentation and grouping in vision , 2001 .

[51]  G W Humphreys,et al.  3-D constraints on spatially parallel shape perception , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[52]  S. Zucker,et al.  Evidence for boundary-specific grouping , 1998, Vision Research.

[53]  R. Bhatt,et al.  Discrepancy detection and developmental changes in attentional engagement in infancy , 1999 .

[54]  C. Connor,et al.  Population coding of shape in area V4 , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[55]  P. Salapatek.  Chapter 3 – Pattern Perception in Early Infancy1 , 1975 .

[56]  C. Rovee-Collier,et al.  Advances in infancy research , 1981 .

[57]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Preattentive Object Files: Shapeless Bundles of Basic Features , 1997, Vision Research.

[58]  Jon Driver,et al.  Parallel computation of symmetry but not repetition within single visual shapes , 1994 .

[59]  M. Arterberry.  3 - Perceptual Unit Formation in Infancy , 2001 .

[60]  J. Colombo,et al.  Individual differences in infant visual attention: recognition of degraded visual forms by four-month-olds. , 1996, Child development.

[61]  J. P. Vroom,et al.  Advances in Psychology. , 1998, Canadian Medical Association journal.

[62]  A Treisman,et al.  Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. , 1988, Psychological review.