Abstracting/abstract adaptation to digital environments: research trends

The technological revolution is affecting the structure, form and content of documents, reducing the effectiveness of traditional abstracts that, to some extent, are inadequate to the new documentary conditions. Aims to show the directions in which abstracting/abstracts can evolve to achieve the necessary adequacy in the new digital environments. Three researching trends are proposed: theoretical, methodological and pragmatic. Theoretically, there are some needs for expanding the document concept, reengineering abstracting and designing interdisciplinary models. Methodologically, the trend is toward the structuring, automating and qualifying of the abstracts. Pragmatically, abstracts networking, combined with alternative and complementary models, open a new and promising horizon. Automating, structuring and qualifying abstracting/abstract offer some short‐term prospects for progress. Concludes that reengineering, networking and visualising would be middle‐term fruitful areas of research toward the full adequacy of abstracting in the new electronic age.

[1]  Elizabeth Du,et al.  The discourse-level structure of empirical abstracts: an exploratory study , 1991, Inf. Process. Manag..

[2]  David R. Dowty,et al.  Introduction to Montague semantics , 1980 .

[3]  C. G. Figuerola El resumen documental. Paradigmas, modelos y métodos (M. Pinto) , 2003 .

[4]  Chris Armstrong,et al.  Metadata, recall, and abstracts: can abstracts ever be reliable indicators of document value? , 1997 .

[5]  Dominique Estival,et al.  Karen Sparck Jones & Julia R. Galliers, Evaluating Natural Language Processing Systems: An Analysis and Review. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 1083 , 1998, Machine Translation.

[6]  Thomas D. Wilson,et al.  Exploring models of information behaviour: the 'uncertainty' project , 1999, Inf. Process. Manag..

[7]  Charles F. Goldfarb,et al.  SGML handbook , 1990 .

[8]  Joost Kircz,et al.  Modularity: the next form of scientific information presentation? , 1998, J. Documentation.

[9]  Bob Boiko,et al.  Content Management Bible , 2001 .

[10]  María Pinto Molina Documentary abstracting: toward a methodological model , 1995 .

[11]  F. W. Lancaster,et al.  Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice , 1991 .

[12]  John Hutchins,et al.  SUMMARIZATION: SOME PROBLEMS AND METHODS , 2004 .

[13]  Gerard Salton,et al.  Automatic Text Processing: The Transformation, Analysis, and Retrieval of Information by Computer , 1989 .

[14]  Bryce L. Allen Visualization and Cognitive Abilities , 1998 .

[15]  Robert H. Gregory Document processing , 1955, AIEE-IRE '55 (Eastern).

[16]  I. Cornelius,et al.  Information and interpretation , 1996 .

[17]  Mildred L. G. Shaw,et al.  WebMap: Concept Mapping on the Web , 1995, World Wide Web J..

[18]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  Information science and the phenomenon of information , 1976, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[19]  Brian Wilson,et al.  Redressing the anxiety imbalance: Computerphobia and educators , 1999, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[20]  C. Kuhlthau,et al.  Imagery for constructing meaning in the information search process: a study of middle school students , 1999 .

[21]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  A framework for representing knowledge , 1974 .

[22]  S. Hannabuss Approaches to research , 1995 .

[23]  Ronald N. Kostoff,et al.  Open letter to technical journal editors regarding structured abstracts: this letter proposes that structured abstracts be required for all technical journal articles , 2002, J. Inf. Sci..

[24]  Louis Cohen,et al.  Quality Function Deployment: How to Make QFD Work for You , 1995 .

[25]  Marie-Francine Moens,et al.  Automatic Indexing and Abstracting of Document Texts , 2000, Computational Linguistics.

[26]  Birger Hjørland,et al.  Theory and metatheory of information science: a new interpretation , 1998, J. Documentation.

[27]  Henry Black,et al.  Indexing and Abstracting , 1940, The Library Quarterly.

[28]  Carol Tenopir Priorities of Quality , 1995 .

[29]  James Hartley,et al.  Obtaining information accurately and quickly: are structured abstracts more efficient? , 1996, J. Inf. Sci..

[30]  Françoise Salager-Meyer Medical English Abstracts: How Well Are They Structured?. , 1991 .

[31]  Tefko Saracevic,et al.  Information science: What is it? , 1968 .

[32]  F. W. Lancaster,et al.  Abstracts and Abstracting in Knowledge Discovery , 1999, Libr. Trends.

[33]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  Reminding and Memory Organization: An Introduction to MOPs. , 1979 .

[34]  G Salton,et al.  Automatic Analysis, Theme Generation, and Summarization of Machine-Readable Texts , 1994, Science.

[35]  Peter Hernon,et al.  Delivering Satisfaction and Service Quality: A Customer-Based Approach for Libraries , 2000 .

[36]  Karen Spärck Jones Automatic summarising: factors and directions , 1998, ArXiv.

[37]  Birger Hjørland,et al.  Domain analysis in information science Eleven approaches traditional as well as innovative , 2002 .

[38]  Scott Nicholson,et al.  Indexing and Abstracting on the World Wide Web: An Examination of Six Web Databases , 1997 .

[39]  Edward T. Cremmins Value-added processing of representational and speculative information using cognitive skills , 1992, J. Inf. Sci..

[40]  Kwai-Sang Chin,et al.  A quality function deployment approach for improving technical library and information services: a case study , 2001 .

[41]  Maria Pinto,et al.  Engineering the Production of Meta-Information: The Abstracting Concern , 2003, J. Inf. Sci..

[42]  Hans-Horst Schröder,et al.  QFD (Quality Function Deployment) , 1996 .

[43]  Hans Peter Luhn,et al.  The Automatic Creation of Literature Abstracts , 1958, IBM J. Res. Dev..

[44]  Therese Firmin Hand,et al.  A Proposal for Task-based Evaluation of Text Summarization Systems , 1997, Workshop On Intelligent Scalable Text Summarization.

[45]  Brian Vickery,et al.  Metatheory and information science , 1997, J. Documentation.

[46]  Marie-Francine Moens,et al.  Use of a text grammar for generating highlight abstracts of magazine articles , 2000, J. Documentation.

[47]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Strategies of discourse comprehension , 1983 .

[48]  David C. Blair,et al.  Knowledge management: Hype, hope, or help? , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[49]  Michael McGill,et al.  Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval , 1983 .

[50]  Mounia Lalmas,et al.  Representing and retrieving structured documents using the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence: modelling and evaluation , 1998, J. Documentation.

[51]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  The cognitive viewpoint in information science , 1990, J. Inf. Sci..