Game interaction state graphs for evaluation of user engagement in explorative and experience-based training games

There is an increasing interest to use computer games for non-traditional education, such as for training purposes. For training education, simulators are considered as offering more realistic learning environments to experience situations that are similar to real world. This type of learning is more beneficial for practicing critical situations which are difficult or impossible in real world training, for instance experience the consequences of unsafe driving. However, the effectiveness of simulation-based learning of this nature is dependent upon the learner's engagement and explorative behaviour. Most current learner evaluation systems are unable to capture this type of learning. Therefore, in this paper we introduce the concept of game interaction state graphs (GISGs) to capture the engagement in explorative and experience-based training tasks. These graphs are constructed based on rules which capture psychologically significant learner behaviours and situations. Simple variables reflecting game state and learner's controller actions provide the ingredients to the rules. This approach eliminates the complexity involved with other similar approaches, such as constructing a full-fledged cognitive model for the learner. GISGs, at minimum, can be used to evaluate the explorative behaviour, the training performance and personal preferences of a learner.

[1]  L. T,et al.  Electrooculographic and performance indices of fatigue during simulated flight , 2022 .

[2]  George D. Kuh,et al.  Student Engagement and Student Learning: Testing the Linkages* , 2006 .

[3]  Alyssa M Hackett,et al.  National highway traffic safety administration (NHTSA) notes , 2011 .

[4]  A. Craig,et al.  A critical review of the psychophysiology of driver fatigue , 2001, Biological Psychology.

[5]  P. Backlund,et al.  Designing for Self-Efficacy in a Game Based Simulator: An Experimental Study and Its Implications for Serious Games Design , 2008, 2008 International Conference Visualisation.

[6]  Mikael Blaisdell In iPod We Trust , 2006 .

[7]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[8]  Jessica D. Bayliss,et al.  The Classroom is a Game ? , 2009 .

[9]  Jennifer Healey,et al.  Digital processing of affective signals , 1998, Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, ICASSP '98 (Cat. No.98CH36181).

[10]  Henrik Engström,et al.  Games for traffic education: An experimental study of a game-based driving simulator , 2010 .

[11]  Alan J. Dix,et al.  Affective Videogames and Modes of Affective Gaming: Assist Me, Challenge Me, Emote Me (ACE) , 2005, DiGRA Conference.

[12]  Claudius Gros,et al.  Cognition and Emotion: Perspectives of a Closing Gap , 2010, Cognitive Computation.

[13]  Mark Claypool,et al.  Relating cognitive models of computer games to user evaluations of entertainment , 2009, FDG.

[14]  C. Collet,et al.  Stroop color–word test, arousal, electrodermal activity and performance in a critical driving situation , 2005, Biological Psychology.

[15]  K. Galotti Cognitive psychology in and out of the laboratory , 1993 .

[16]  Per Backlund,et al.  Sidh - a Game Based Firefighter Training Simulation , 2007, 2007 11th International Conference Information Visualization (IV '07).

[17]  Angela Brennecke,et al.  A general framework for digital game-based training systems , 2009 .

[18]  Simon Egenfeldt-Nielsen Overview of research on the educational use of video games , 2006 .