Effects of keyword on long-term retention: Help or hindrance?

Three experiments assessed the long-term effectiveness of the keyword mnemonic relative to a nonmnemonic (i.e., semantic-context) learning strategy. Following incidental-learning instructions, cued recall was assessed either immediately or after a 2-day delay. The keyword mnemonic produced superior immediate performance relative to the semantic-context strategy. However, after 2 days, there was a marked reversal in performance, with higher levels of delayed recall associated with semantic-context learning. This pattern of findings was obtained when obscure English words (Experiment 1) and second-language vocabulary (Experiment 2) were the learning stimuli. When practice frequencies were manipulated (Experiment 3), increased opportunities for study were more likely to boost the long-term retention of keyword learners compared with semantic-context learners. The implication is that keyword-based memories are especially fragile over time and will benefit from repeated testing and rehearsal.

[1]  M. Pressley.  Mnemonic versus Nonmnemonic Vocabulary-Learning Strategies: Additional Comparisons. , 1982 .

[2]  J. Levin,et al.  Mnemonic vocabulary instruction : additional effectiveness evidence , 1992 .

[3]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Long-term retention of vocabulary after keyword and context learning. , 1987 .

[4]  C. D. Mercer,et al.  Toward Independence with Keyword Mnemonics , 1992 .

[5]  J. Levin,et al.  Degree of mnemonic support and students’ acquisition of science facts , 1987 .

[6]  B. Underwood.  Degree of learning and the measurement of forgetting. , 1964 .

[7]  John R. Surber,et al.  Effects of context and keyword methods on second language vocabulary acquisition , 1992 .

[8]  Margaret H. Thomas,et al.  Keyword mnemonic and retention of second-language vocabulary words. , 1992 .

[9]  R. Schmidt,et al.  New Conceptualizations of Practice: Common Principles in Three Paradigms Suggest New Concepts for Training , 1992 .

[10]  John A. Glover,et al.  The "testing" phenomenon: Not gone but nearly forgotten. , 1989 .

[11]  R. Atkinson.  Mnemotechnics in Second Language Learning. , 1975 .

[12]  R. R. Hunt,et al.  A reexamination of the role of imagery in learning and memory. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  W. Runquist,et al.  Some effects of remembering on forgetting , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[14]  B. Underwood,et al.  Speed of learning and amount retained: a consideration of methodology. , 1954, Psychological bulletin.

[15]  J. Levin,et al.  Learning Botany Concepts Mnemonically: Seeing the Forest "and" the Trees. , 1989 .

[16]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  More on interpretive factors in forgetting , 1977, Memory & cognition.

[17]  Michael Pressley,et al.  How Does the Keyword Method Affect Vocabulary Comprehension and Usage? Report from the project on Studies in Language: Reading and Communication. Working Paper No. 278. , 1980 .

[18]  Alvin Y. Wang.  Assessing Developmental Differences in Retention. , 1991 .

[19]  L. Surian,et al.  Why does imagery improve memory , 1989 .

[20]  M. Pressley,et al.  The Mnemonic Keyword Method , 1982 .

[21]  Margaret H. Thomas,et al.  Long-term retention under conditions of intentional learning and the keyword mnemonic , 1993 .