Analysis of Music Tagging and Listening Patterns: Do Tags Really Function as Retrieval Aids?

In collaborative tagging systems, it is generally assumed that users assign tags to facilitate retrieval of content at a later time. There is, however, little behavioral evidence that tags actually serve this purpose. Using a large-scale dataset from the social music website Last.fm, we explore how patterns of music tagging and subsequent listening interact to determine if there exist measurable signals of tags functioning as retrieval aids. Specifically, we describe our methods for testing if the assignment of a tag tends to lead to an increase in listening behavior. Results suggest that tagging, on average, leads to only very small increases in listening rates, and overall the data do not support the assumption that tags generally serve as retrieval aids.

[1]  Peter M. Todd,et al.  "Supertagger" behavior in building folksonomies , 2014, WebSci '14.

[2]  Mor Naaman,et al.  Why we tag: motivations for annotation in mobile and online media , 2007, CHI.

[3]  Christian Wolff,et al.  Personal Information Management vs. Resource Sharing: Towards a Model of Information Behaviour in Social Tagging Systems , 2009, ICWSM 2009.

[4]  Vittorio Loreto,et al.  Collaborative Tagging and Semiotic Dynamics , 2006, ArXiv.

[5]  Lora Aroyo,et al.  The Semantic Web: Research and Applications , 2009, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[6]  Rui Li,et al.  Survey on social tagging techniques , 2010, SKDD.

[7]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  Categorization in the wild , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Generalized Additive Models , 1986 .

[9]  Jacek Gwizdka,et al.  Personal information management , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[10]  Vittorio Loreto,et al.  Semiotic dynamics and collaborative tagging , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Valentin Robu,et al.  The complex dynamics of collaborative tagging , 2007, WWW '07.

[12]  Alla Zollers,et al.  Emerging Motivations for Tagging: Expression, Performance, and Activism , 2007 .

[13]  Peter M. Todd,et al.  Can simple social copying heuristics explain tag popularity in a collaborative tagging system? , 2013, WebSci.

[14]  Bernardo A. Huberman,et al.  Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems , 2006, J. Inf. Sci..

[15]  Mor Naaman,et al.  HT06, tagging paper, taxonomy, Flickr, academic article, to read , 2006, HYPERTEXT '06.

[16]  Christian Wolff,et al.  Personal Information Management vs. Resource Sharing: Towards a Model of Information Behavior in Social Tagging Systems , 2009, ICWSM.

[17]  Andreas Hotho,et al.  Information Retrieval in Folksonomies: Search and Ranking , 2006, ESWC.

[18]  Christoph Meinel,et al.  SPEAR: SPAMMING‐RESISTANT EXPERTISE ANALYSIS AND RANKING IN COLLABORATIVE TAGGING SYSTEMS , 2011, Comput. Intell..

[19]  Markus Strohmaier,et al.  Of categorizers and describers: an evaluation of quantitative measures for tagging motivation , 2010, HT '10.