Me or not me – An optimal integration of agency cues?

Recent work has demonstrated that the sense of agency is not only determined by efference-copy-based internal predictions and internal comparator mechanisms, but by a large variety of different internal and external cues. The study by Moore and colleagues [Moore, J. W., Wegner, D. M., & Haggard, P. (2009). Modulating the sense of agency with external cues. Conscious and Cognition] aimed to provide further evidence for this view by demonstrating that external agency cues might outweigh or even substitute efferent signals to install a basic registration of self-agency. Although the study contains some critical points that, so we argue, are central to a proper interpretation of the data, it hints at a new perspective on agency: optimal cue integration seems to be the key to a robust sense of agency. We here argue that this framework could allow integrating the findings of Moore and colleagues and other recent agency studies into a comprehensive picture of the sense of agency and its pathological disruptions.

[1]  M. Synofzik,et al.  A cognitive theory of thoughts , 2010 .

[2]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Abnormalities in the awareness and control of action. , 2000, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[3]  J. Danckert Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action: Attention and Performance XIX Wolfgang Prinz, Bernhard Hommel (Eds.), Oxford University Press, 2002, Price: £ 65.00, ISBN: 0-19-851069 , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  P. Haggard,et al.  Intention, attention and the temporal experience of action , 2007, Consciousness and Cognition.

[5]  P. Haggard,et al.  Voluntary action and conscious awareness , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  Elisabeth Patherie,et al.  The Content of Intentions , 2000 .

[7]  P. Thier,et al.  Disorders of Agency in Schizophrenia Correlate with an Inability to Compensate for the Sensory Consequences of Actions , 2005, Current Biology.

[8]  M. Ernst,et al.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion , 2002, Nature.

[9]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Action, binding and awareness , 2002 .

[10]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Merging the senses into a robust percept , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[11]  Manos Tsakiris,et al.  A specific role for efferent information in self-recognition , 2005, Cognition.

[12]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning , 2004, Nature.

[13]  P. Haggard,et al.  The role of motor intention in motor awareness: an experimental study on anosognosia for hemiplegia. , 2008, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[14]  A. Newen,et al.  Beyond the comparator model: A multifactorial two-step account of agency , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.

[15]  D. Wegner,et al.  Modulating the sense of agency with external cues , 2009, Consciousness and Cognition.

[16]  Atsushi Sato,et al.  Both motor prediction and conceptual congruency between preview and action-effect contribute to explicit judgment of agency , 2009, Cognition.