Importance of serum hemoglobin in hormone refractory prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES In the search for an early measure of response in hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC), most have targeted changes in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA). Up to this point, no one has targeted changes in serum hemoglobin during treatment. If dynamic changes in hemoglobin after treatment provide additive prognostic information to dynamic changes in PSA, then we should consider and test ways to incorporate serum hemoglobin into measures of response in HRPC. METHODS Our patients consisted of 321 men who were studied on Cancer and Leukemia Group B protocols 9181 and 9182. We fit serial values of PSA and hemoglobin with an exponential model: y = exp(alpha + beta*t + gamma*t(2)) with y symbolizing either PSA or hemoglobin and t denoting time. We then used the Cox proportional hazard model to relate the parameters of the model (alpha, beta, and gamma) to subsequent survival. RESULTS We found that the exponential model fit serial measurements of both PSA and serum hemoglobin well, and all three of the parameters for both markers related closely to subsequent survival (P < or = 0.003). The Cox model suggested a composite hazard score (HS) as a way to consolidate the information from serial measurements of both serum markers, and we observed that those with HS < 0 enjoyed a longer survival. CONCLUSION Because serial measurements of serum hemoglobin during treatment of HRPC add prognostic information to serial measurements of PSA, we hypothesize that combining the dynamic changes in serum hemoglobin with those of PSA could lead to an improved measure of response in HRPC.

[1]  P. V. Rao,et al.  Applied Survival Analysis: Regression Modeling of Time to Event Data , 2000 .

[2]  R. Vollmer,et al.  The dynamics of prostate specific antigen in hormone refractory prostate carcinoma , 1998, Cancer.

[3]  Terry M. Therneau,et al.  Extending the Cox Model , 1997 .

[4]  Taylor Murray,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2000 , 2000, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[5]  B. Freidlin,et al.  Eligibility and response guidelines for phase II clinical trials in androgen-independent prostate cancer: recommendations from the Prostate-Specific Antigen Working Group. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  R. Vollmer,et al.  Predicting tumor failure in prostate carcinoma after definitive radiation therapy: limitations of models based on prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score. , 1999, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[7]  D. Lake,et al.  A randomized study comparing standard versus moderately high dose megestrol acetate for patients with advanced prostate carcinoma , 2000, Cancer.

[8]  P. Grambsch,et al.  Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals , 1994 .

[9]  N. Dubrawsky Cancer statistics , 1989, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[10]  P. Kantoff,et al.  Management of hormone refractory prostate cancer: current standards and future prospects. , 1998, The Journal of urology.

[11]  P. Kantoff,et al.  A prognostic score for hormone-refractory prostate cancer: analysis of two cancer and leukemia group B studies. , 1999, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[12]  D. Cox,et al.  Analysis of Survival Data. , 1986 .

[13]  P. Kantoff,et al.  Hydrocortisone with or without mitoxantrone in men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer: results of the cancer and leukemia group B 9182 study. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.