Sustainability as a Priority at Major U.S. Department of Energy’s Defense Sites: Surrounding Population Views

Sustainability is rapidly becoming a widely accepted and desired attitude, as well as a stimulus for both environmentally-conscious individuals and firm behavior. However, does the public interest in sustainability also extend to large U.S. federal agencies? Does the public care about on-site sustainability programs? To answer this question, we surveyed 922 people who live within 50 miles of one of four U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) major facilities: Hanford, Idaho National Laboratory, Savannah River and the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. Only 14% expressed no interest in DOE’s on-site sustainability efforts. Five percent said that they were interested enough to join a local community group to provide feedback to the DOE; 49% were interested and wanted more information, as well as interaction with the DOE’s site-specific advisory boards or local elected officials. Compared to other DOE on-site activities, respondents rated sustainability as “somewhat important”. Native Americans who live near a site, are familiar with it and self-identify as interested in environmental protection disproportionately belong to the “most interested” category. We conclude that public interest is sufficient to merit outreach by DOE to involve interested and knowledgeable local residents in on-site sustainability plans.

[1]  R. Kates,et al.  Do Global Attitudes and Behaviors Support Sustainable Development? , 2005 .

[2]  C. K. Mertz,et al.  Gender, race, and perception of environmental health risks. , 1994, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[3]  J. B. Callicott.  Traditional American Indian and Western European Attitudes toward Nature: An Overview , 1982 .

[4]  Benjamin I. Page,et al.  What Moves Public Opinion? , 1987, American Political Science Review.

[5]  C. King,et al.  The Question of Participation: Toward Authentic Public Participation in Public Administration , 1998 .

[6]  M. Pollemans,et al.  National Health Interview Surveys for health care policy. , 1988, Social science & medicine.

[7]  Raymond De Young,et al.  New Ways to Promote Proenvironmental Behavior: Expanding and Evaluating Motives for Environmentally Responsible Behavior , 2000 .

[8]  Alec M. Gallup,et al.  The Gallup poll : public opinion , 1972 .

[9]  Kristen Purcell,et al.  Public Participation and the Environment: Do We Know What Works? , 1999 .

[10]  R. Florida.  The Rise of the Creative Class , 2002 .

[11]  Michael Greenberg.  Nuclear Waste Management, Nuclear Power, and Energy Choices: Public Preferences, Perceptions, and Trust , 2012 .

[12]  Bryan Blankfield.  The Good Neighbor: Franklin D. Roosevelt and the Rhetoric of American Power , 2016 .

[13]  R. Dunlap,et al.  The evolution of the U.S. environmental movement from 1970 to 1990: An overview , 1991 .

[14]  C. K. Mertz,et al.  Gender, race, and perceived risk: The 'white male' effect , 2000 .

[15]  B. Goldstein,et al.  Stakeholder participation: Experience from the CRESP program , 2000 .

[16]  I. Vasi.  Public Support for Sustainable Development: A Mile Wide, but How Deep? , 2012 .

[17]  L. Pil.  The Rise of the Creative Class , 2004 .

[18]  Karen Lowrie,et al.  Questioning conventional wisdom: the regional economic impacts of Major US nuclear weapons sites, 1970-1994 , 1999 .

[19]  Natalie Fenton,et al.  New Media, Old News: Journalism and Democracy in the Digital Age , 2009 .

[20]  W. E. Riebsame,et al.  Atlas of the New West , Portraits of a Changing Region , 1997 .

[21]  John P. Robinson,et al.  News Media Use and the Informed Public: A 1990s Update , 1996 .

[22]  Thomas C. Beierle.  Democracy in Practice: Public Participation in Environmental Decisions , 2010 .

[23]  F. G. Kilgour.  The evolution of the book , 1998 .

[24]  Paul F. Starrs,et al.  Atlas of the New West: Portrait of a Changing Region , 1998 .

[25]  Carol L. Silva,et al.  Reversing Nuclear Opposition: Evolving Public Acceptance of a Permanent Nuclear Waste Disposal Facility , 2011, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[26]  S. Padel,et al.  Exploring the gap between attitudes and behaviour: understanding why consumers buy or do not buy organic food , 2005 .

[27]  Melvin J. Dubnick.  Army Corps of Engineers , 1998 .

[28]  Michael Greenberg,et al.  Citizen board issues and local newspaper coverage of risk, remediation, and environmental management: Six U.S. nuclear weapons facilities , 2008 .

[29]  D. Lewis.  Native Americans and the Environment: A Survey of Twentieth-Century Issues , 1995 .

[30]  M. Baldassare,et al.  The Personal Threat of Environmental Problems as Predictor of Environmental Practices , 1992 .

[31]  P. Stern,et al.  Personal and contextual influences on househould energy adaptations. , 1985 .

[32]  Shepherd Mpofu,et al.  New media, old news: Journalism and democracy in the digital age , 2013 .

[33]  Karen Lowrie,et al.  Bombs and Butterflies: A Case Study of the Challenges of Post Cold War Environmental Planning and Management for the US Nuclear Weapons Sites , 1997 .