A SKOS-based framework for Subject Ontologies to improve learning experiences

Subject Ontologies represent conceptualizations of disciplinary domains in which concepts symbolize topics that are relevant for the considered domain and are associated each other by means of specific relations. Usually, these kind of lightweight ontologies are adopted in knowledge-based educational environments to enable semantic organization and search of resources and, in other cases, to support personalization and adaptation features for learning and teaching experiences. For this reason, applying effective management methodologies for Subject Ontologies is a crucial aspect in engineering the environments. In particular, this paper proposes an approach to use SKOS (a Semantic Web-based vocabulary providing a standard way to represent knowledge organization systems) for modelling subject ontologies. Moreover, the paper underlines the main benefits of SKOS. It focuses on alternative strategies for storing and accessing ontologies in order to support the knowledge sharing, knowledge reusing, planning, assessment, customization and adaptation processes related to learning scenarios. The results of an early experimentation allowed the authors defining a framework able to support, from both methodological and technological viewpoints, the use of Subject Ontologies in the context of a Semantic Web-based Educational System. The defined framework has high performances in terms of response and this may really improve the user experience. We defined a framework to use Subject Ontologies in Educational Systems.Subject Ontologies support learning scenarios by representing themes to treat.SKOS is a good technical approach to improve the learning experience of users.We identified a good strategy to treat Subject Ontologies and support SWBESs.The described approach may improve the performance of the learning processes.

[1]  Tim Berners-Lee,et al.  Linked Data - The Story So Far , 2009, Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst..

[2]  Antonio Marzano,et al.  Educational Assessment: Semantic Representation and Ontologies , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems.

[3]  Miltiadis D. Lytras,et al.  A recommender agent based on learning styles for better virtual collaborative learning experiences , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[4]  Christian Bizer,et al.  The Berlin SPARQL Benchmark , 2009, Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst..

[5]  Pierluigi Ritrovato,et al.  Advanced ontology management system for personalised e-Learning , 2009, Knowl. Based Syst..

[6]  Angeliki Poulymenakou,et al.  Developing a Usability Evaluation Method for e-Learning Applications: Beyond Functional Usability , 2009, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[7]  Panagiotis Zervas,et al.  A Workflow for Learning Objects Lifecycle and Reuse: Towards Evaluating Cost Effective Reuse , 2011, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[8]  Paulo Novais,et al.  The Problem of Learning Non-taxonomic Relationships of Ontologies from Text , 2012, DCAI.

[9]  Mike Uschold,et al.  A Framework for Understanding and Classifying Ontology Applications , 1999 .

[10]  Nicola Capuano,et al.  e-Learning at Work in the Knowledge Virtual Enterprise , 2008, 2008 International Conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems.

[11]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing? , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[12]  Giovannina Albano,et al.  Personalized Learning in Mathematics , 2015 .

[13]  Pierluigi Ritrovato,et al.  SUPPORTING LEARNING OBJECT REPOSITORY BY AUTOMATIC EXTRACTION OF METADATA , 2015 .

[14]  Mari Carmen Suárez-Figueroa,et al.  NeOn methodology for building ontology networks: specification, scheduling and reuse , 2011, DISKI.

[15]  Biswanath Dutta,et al.  Ontology Supported Personalized eLearning Repositories , 2009 .

[16]  Peter Dolog,et al.  Reasoning and Ontologies for Personalized E-Learning in the Semantic Web , 2004, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[17]  Pierluigi Ritrovato,et al.  ARISTOTELE: A Semantic-Driven Platform for Enterprise Management , 2013, 2013 27th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops.

[18]  Guillaume Blin,et al.  A survey of RDF storage approaches , 2012, ARIMA J..

[19]  Alexandra I. Cristea,et al.  GRAPPLE: Personalization and Adaptation in Learning Management Systems , 2010 .

[20]  Ig Ibert Bittencourt,et al.  A computational model for developing semantic web-based educational systems , 2009, Knowl. Based Syst..

[21]  Heidrun Allert,et al.  Rethinking the Use of Ontologies in Learning , 2006, EC-TEL Workshops.

[22]  Nicola Capuano,et al.  Ontology Extraction from Existing Educational Content to Improve Personalized e-Learning Experiences , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing.

[23]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  A Description Logic Primer , 2012, ArXiv.

[24]  Lester Gilbert,et al.  Pedagogically informed metadata content and structure for learning and teaching , 2007 .

[25]  Marilyn McClelland.  Metadata Standards for Educational Resources , 2003, Computer.

[26]  Claudio Gutierrez,et al.  Survey of graph database models , 2008, CSUR.

[27]  Hyun-Sook Chung,et al.  Ontology Design for Creating Adaptive Learning Path in e-Learning Environment , 2012 .