An Investigation of the Impact of Integrated Learning System Use on Mathematics Achievement of Elementary Students.

The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between time spent on an integrated learning system (ILS) entitled, SuccessMaker ® , as a supplement to traditional mathematics instruction on achievement as measured by standardized achievement tests of elementary students. The variables of grade-level, ability level, and gender were also considered. The population consisted of students who were second-, third-, and fourth-graders during the 1997-98 school year. Data were gathered that covered the three-year period beginning in 1997 and ending in 2000. The final sample consisted of 348 students who participated in Computer Curriculum Corporation © mathematics instruction and who completed the Terra Nova in 1997-98, 1998-99, and 1999-2000. Analysis of Variance was used to identify any relationship between variables. The study's investigation of the relationship between ILS use and mathematics achievement could assist educators in planning for use of technology as a supplement to traditional instruction. While the information gleaned is specifically beneficial to Greeneville City Schools, other school systems seeking information on the relationship between ILS use and achievement will find this study constructive, especially when viewed in conjunction with the existing body of literature. Findings in this study were mixed. ILS use was associated with positive effects, negative effects, and no effects. It was noted that negative effects occurred during the year with the lowest overall usage. No interaction effects were found in any of the models, indicating that the ILS did not have differing effects for boys or girls or for students of varying ability levels. Positive effects of the ILS, Math Concepts and Skills (MCS), on math composite scale scores were noted at grades two and three, while students at grades four, five, and six were either unaffected or negatively affected by the use of MCS. Math Investigations (MI), although used on a very limited basis during the course of this study, had a positive effect overall on math composite scale scores. Clearly, when math gain was the dependent variable, there were no effects demonstrated by use of MCS or MI.

[1]  Meredith D. Gall,et al.  Educational Research: An Introduction , 1965 .

[2]  Nira Hativa,et al.  History, theory and research concerning integrated learning systems , 1994 .

[3]  M. Honey,et al.  Perspectives on Technology and Education Research: Lessons from the Past and Present , 2000 .

[4]  Making Effective Use of Computer Technology , 1992 .

[5]  M. Sherry.  Implementing an Integrated Instructional System: Critical Issues. , 1990 .

[6]  Harold H. Wenglinsky.  Does It Compute? The Relationship between Educational Technology and Student Achievement in Mathematics. , 1998 .

[7]  Iheanacho I. Orabuchi.  Effects of Using Interactive CAI on Primary Grade Students' Higher-Order Thinking Skills: Inferences, Generalizations, and Math Problem Solving. , 1992 .

[8]  Senta A. Raizen,et al.  Program Evaluation in Education, When? How? to What Ends? , 1981 .

[9]  Philip V. Bender.  The Effectiveness of Integrated Computer Learning Systems in the Elementary School. , 1991 .

[10]  Henry Jay Becker,et al.  A model for improving the performance of integrated learning systems: mixed individualized/group/whole class lessons, cooperative learning, and organizing time for teacher-led remediation of small groups , 1992 .

[11]  Harold F. O'Neil,et al.  Meta-analytic studies of findings on computer-based instruction. , 1994 .

[12]  Gabriela C. Weaver,et al.  An Examination of the National Educational Longitudinal Study (NELS:88) Database to Probe the Correlation Between Computer Use in School and Improvement in Test Scores , 2000 .

[13]  Alfred Bork,et al.  Is Technology-Based Learning Effective? , 1991 .

[14]  Edward Bentley.  Integrated Learning Systems: The Problems with the Solution. , 1991 .

[15]  Blaine R. Worthen,et al.  The impact of integrated learning system implementation on student outcomes: Implications for research and evaluation , 1994 .

[16]  Cynthia Schalago-Schirm.  Does the Computer-Assisted Remedial Mathematics Program at Kearny High School Lead to Improved Scores on the N.J. Early Warning Test?. , 1995 .

[17]  S. Brooks,et al.  Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences , 1993 .

[18]  John Cradler,et al.  Computers and Classrooms: The Status of Technology in U.S. Schools. Policy Information Report. , 1997 .

[19]  R. Gonzalez.  Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences , 2003 .

[20]  Shari Robinson.  Integrated Learning Systems: From Teacher-Proof to Teacher Empowering. , 1991 .

[21]  Julie S. Vargas.  Instructional Design Flaws in Computer-Assisted Instruction. , 1986 .

[22]  Jean Underwood,et al.  Are integrated learning systems effective learning support tools? , 1996, Comput. Educ..

[23]  Dale Mann,et al.  Technology and Achievement. , 1997 .

[24]  Thomas A. DeVaney.  The Effects of Computers and Calculators on Computation and Geometry Achievement. , 1996 .

[25]  Les Potter,et al.  Utilizing Computers for Reading Improvement in a Junior High: A Case Study , 1998 .

[26]  W. L. Benedict Nixon,et al.  Computer-assisted Instruction , 1972 .

[27]  Lynnette Taylor,et al.  An integrated learning system and its effect on examination performance in mathematics , 1999, Comput. Educ..

[28]  Mary McNabb,et al.  Planning for D[Cubed]T: Data-Driven Decisions about Technology. CD-ROM with Critical Issues in Evaluating the Effectiveness of Technology. , 1999 .

[29]  Kathy A. Krendl,et al.  At-Risk Students and Microcomputers: What Do We Know and How Do We Know it? , 1990 .

[30]  Jonathan D. Becker,et al.  West Virginia Story: Achievement Gains from a Statewide Comprehensive Instructional Technology Program , 1999 .