Molecular Dynamics Analysis of Binding of Kinase Inhibitors to WT EGFR and the T790M Mutant.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors interrupt EGFR-dependent cellular signaling pathways that lead to accelerated tumor growth and proliferation. Mutation of a threonine in the inhibitor binding pocket, known as the "gatekeeper", to methionine (T790M) confers acquired resistance to several EGFR-selective inhibitors. We studied interactions between EGFR inhibitors and the gatekeeper residues of the target protein. Thermodynamic integration (TI) with Amber14 indicates that the binding energies of gefitinib and AEE788 to the active state of the T790M mutant EGFR is 3 kcal/mol higher than to the wild type (WT), whereas ATP binding energy to the mutant is similar to the WT. Using metadynamics MD simulations with NAMD v2.9, the conformational equilibrium between the inactive resting state and the catalytically competent activate state was determined for the WT EGFR. When combined with the results obtained by Sutto and Gervasio, our simulations showed that the T790M point mutation lowers the free energy of the active state by 5 kcal/mol relative to the inactive state of the enzyme. Relative to the WT, the T790M mutant binds gefitinib more strongly. The T790M mutation is nevertheless resistant due to its increased binding of ATP. By contrast, the binding of AEE788 to the active state causes a conformational change in the αC-helix adjacent to the inhibitor binding pocket, that results in a 2 kcal/mol energy penalty. The energy penalty explains why the binding of AEE788 to the T790M mutant is unfavorable relative to binding to WT EGFR. These results establish the role of the gatekeeper mutation on inhibitor selectivity. Additional molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, TI, and metadynamics MD simulations reveal the origins of the changes in binding energy of WT and mutants.

[1]  Susan Quinn,et al.  Neratinib, an irreversible pan-ErbB receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor: results of a phase II trial in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  A. Laio,et al.  Metadynamics: a method to simulate rare events and reconstruct the free energy in biophysics, chemistry and material science , 2008 .

[3]  C. Peschel,et al.  Functional Analysis of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Mutations and Potential Implications for EGFR Targeted Therapy , 2009, Clinical Cancer Research.

[4]  K. Aldape,et al.  Phase I study of AEE788, a novel multitarget inhibitor of ErbB- and VEGF-receptor-family tyrosine kinases, in recurrent glioblastoma patients , 2012, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[5]  Nicholas M. Glykos,et al.  Grcarma: A fully automated task‐oriented interface for the analysis of molecular dynamics trajectories , 2013, J. Comput. Chem..

[6]  T. Straatsma,et al.  Separation‐shifted scaling, a new scaling method for Lennard‐Jones interactions in thermodynamic integration , 1994 .

[7]  Ron Bose,et al.  Inhibition of the EGF Receptor by Binding to an Activating Kinase Domain Interface , 2007, Nature.

[8]  Ying-Chieh Sun,et al.  Computation of relative binding free energy for an inhibitor and its analogs binding with Erk kinase using thermodynamic integration MD simulation , 2012, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.

[9]  Liang Cheng,et al.  Molecular pathology of lung cancer: key to personalized medicine , 2012, Modern Pathology.

[10]  M. Fukuoka,et al.  Differential constitutive activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor in non-small cell lung cancer cells bearing EGFR gene mutation and amplification. , 2007, Cancer research.

[11]  A. Elcock,et al.  Accurate calculation of mutational effects on the thermodynamics of inhibitor binding to p38α MAP kinase: a combined computational and experimental study. , 2013, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[12]  N. Hanna,et al.  EGF Receptor Gene Mutations Are Common in Lung Cancers From “Never Smokers” and Are Associated With Sensitivity of Tumors to Gefitinib and Erlotinib , 2006 .

[13]  György Kéri,et al.  Cellular targets of gefitinib. , 2005, Cancer research.

[14]  D. Haber,et al.  Epidermal growth factor receptor mutants from human lung cancers exhibit enhanced catalytic activity and increased sensitivity to gefitinib. , 2007, Cancer research.

[15]  W. Pao,et al.  Abstract 2101A: CNX-2006, a novel irreversible epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor, selectively inhibits EGFR T790M and fails to induce T790M-mediated resistancein vitro. , 2013 .

[16]  John Kuriyan,et al.  Activation of tyrosine kinases by mutation of the gatekeeper threonine , 2008, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[17]  Albert C. Pan,et al.  Transitions to catalytically inactive conformations in EGFR kinase , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  K Schulten,et al.  VMD: visual molecular dynamics. , 1996, Journal of molecular graphics.

[19]  Laxmikant V. Kalé,et al.  Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[20]  J. Settleman,et al.  Temporal resolution of autophosphorylation for normal and oncogenic forms of EGFR and differential effects of gefitinib. , 2012, Biochemistry.

[21]  T. Steinbrecher,et al.  Towards accurate free energy calculations in ligand protein-binding studies. , 2010, Current medicinal chemistry.

[22]  Stuart Thomson,et al.  Kinetic analysis of epidermal growth factor receptor somatic mutant proteins shows increased sensitivity to the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, erlotinib. , 2006, Cancer research.

[23]  S. Laufer,et al.  Fighting cancer drug resistance: Opportunities and challenges for mutation-specific EGFR inhibitors. , 2015, Drug resistance updates : reviews and commentaries in antimicrobial and anticancer chemotherapy.

[24]  D. Tenen,et al.  Differential responses to erlotinib in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated lung cancers with acquired resistance to gefitinib carrying the L747S or T790M secondary mutations. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[25]  L. Landi,et al.  Targeted therapies: Front-line therapy in lung cancer with mutations in EGFR , 2011, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[26]  Junmei Wang,et al.  Development and testing of a general amber force field , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[27]  P. Jänne,et al.  The quest to overcome resistance to EGFR-targeted therapies in cancer , 2013, Nature Medicine.

[28]  A. Laio,et al.  Efficient reconstruction of complex free energy landscapes by multiple walkers metadynamics. , 2006, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[29]  R. Hegger,et al.  Dihedral angle principal component analysis of molecular dynamics simulations. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[30]  M. Meyerson,et al.  BIBW2992, an irreversible EGFR/HER2 inhibitor highly effective in preclinical lung cancer models , 2008, Oncogene.

[31]  Antony W Burgess,et al.  Epidermal growth factor receptor: mechanisms of activation and signalling. , 2003, Experimental cell research.

[32]  N. Normanno,et al.  Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling in cancer. , 2006, Gene.

[33]  L. Stewart,et al.  Conformational control inhibition of the BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase, including the gatekeeper T315I mutant, by the switch-control inhibitor DCC-2036. , 2011, Cancer cell.

[34]  Y. Miyagi,et al.  WZ4002, a third-generation EGFR inhibitor, can overcome anoikis resistance in EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinomas more efficiently than Src inhibitors , 2012, Laboratory Investigation.

[35]  V. Hornak,et al.  Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters , 2006, Proteins.

[36]  H. Burris,et al.  Dual kinase inhibition in the treatment of breast cancer: initial experience with the EGFR/ErbB-2 inhibitor lapatinib. , 2004, The oncologist.

[37]  U. McDermott,et al.  The T790M “gatekeeper” mutation in EGFR mediates resistance to low concentrations of an irreversible EGFR inhibitor , 2008, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[38]  Ross C Walker,et al.  Improving the Efficiency of Free Energy Calculations in the Amber Molecular Dynamics Package. , 2013, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[39]  Roland L. Dunbrack,et al.  A smoothed backbone-dependent rotamer library for proteins derived from adaptive kernel density estimates and regressions. , 2011, Structure.

[40]  E. Casale,et al.  Through the "gatekeeper door": exploiting the active kinase conformation. , 2010, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[41]  M. Meyerson,et al.  EGFR mutation and resistance of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[42]  Stefan Bruckner,et al.  Efficiency of alchemical free energy simulations. II. Improvements for thermodynamic integration , 2011, J. Comput. Chem..

[43]  A. Gazdar,et al.  Activating and resistance mutations of EGFR in non-small-cell lung cancer: role in clinical response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors , 2009, Oncogene.

[44]  J. Köhler,et al.  Afatinib, Erlotinib and Gefitinib in the First-Line Therapy of EGFR Mutation-Positive Lung Adenocarcinoma: A Review , 2013, Oncology Research and Treatment.

[45]  Michael Tong,et al.  Targeting conformational plasticity of protein kinases. , 2015, ACS chemical biology.

[46]  A. Gazdar Personalized medicine and inhibition of EGFR signaling in lung cancer. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[47]  András Fiser,et al.  ModLoop: automated modeling of loops in protein structures , 2003, Bioinform..

[48]  P. Kollman,et al.  A well-behaved electrostatic potential-based method using charge restraints for deriving atomic char , 1993 .

[49]  J. Mestan,et al.  AEE788: a dual family epidermal growth factor receptor/ErbB2 and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor with antitumor and antiangiogenic activity. , 2004, Cancer research.

[50]  P. Kollman,et al.  Automatic atom type and bond type perception in molecular mechanical calculations. , 2006, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[51]  M. Parrinello,et al.  Well-tempered metadynamics: a smoothly converging and tunable free-energy method. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[52]  Balazs Halmos,et al.  Structure and clinical relevance of the epidermal growth factor receptor in human cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[53]  R. Morphy Selectively nonselective kinase inhibition: striking the right balance. , 2010, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[54]  Roy S Herbst,et al.  Review of epidermal growth factor receptor biology. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[55]  R. Radhakrishnan,et al.  Molecular dynamics analysis of conserved hydrophobic and hydrophilic bond-interaction networks in ErbB family kinases. , 2011, The Biochemical journal.

[56]  K. Gajiwala,et al.  Insights into the aberrant activity of mutant EGFR kinase domain and drug recognition. , 2013, Structure.

[57]  Gerhard Stock,et al.  Construction of the free energy landscape of biomolecules via dihedral angle principal component analysis. , 2008, The Journal of chemical physics.

[58]  M. Meyerson,et al.  The T790M mutation in EGFR kinase causes drug resistance by increasing the affinity for ATP , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[59]  J. Banavar,et al.  Computer Simulation of Liquids , 1988 .

[60]  John Kuriyan,et al.  Mechanism for Activation of the EGF Receptor Catalytic Domain by the Juxtamembrane Segment , 2009, Cell.

[61]  John R. Engen,et al.  Novel mutant-selective EGFR kinase inhibitors against EGFR T790M , 2009, Nature.

[62]  J. Kirkwood Statistical Mechanics of Fluid Mixtures , 1935 .

[63]  Francesco Luigi Gervasio,et al.  Effects of oncogenic mutations on the conformational free-energy landscape of EGFR kinase , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[64]  N. Pedersen,et al.  AND MUTANT , 2005 .