Social-Activity Travel: Do the ‘Strong-Tie Relationships’ of a Person Exist in the Same Community? The Case of Switzerland

In the relatively new field of social-activity travel behavior research, it has often been stated that social relationships have become increasingly physically dispersed in various contemporary societies. If so, this dynamic has enormous consequences on both travel behavior and social support. More explicitly, people have to travel some distance in order to meet, they need to plan their social activities further ahead of time, and, sociologically speaking, they are at risk of weakening their relationships to friends, immediate family, relatives, etc due to spatial distance. In this paper a binominal logit model was used to examine the characteristics of Swiss citizens who had named nonlocal strong-tie relationships in a nationwide representative survey. The empirical findings show various characteristics that increase the likelihood of having strong-tie relationships outside one's community, such as one-person households, higher education, younger cohorts, long-distance commuting, and, interestingly, people who want to spend more time with friends. I elaborate a discussion of these findings as they concern recent debates in the field of social-activity travel behavior.

[1]  Eric J. Miller,et al.  Exploring the propensity to perform social activities: a social network approach , 2006 .

[2]  J. Stanley,et al.  Investigating Links between Social Capital and Public Transport , 2008 .

[3]  D. Harvey,et al.  The Condition of Postmodernity. An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change (an excerpt) , 1991, Journal of Economic Sociology.

[4]  Claude S. Fischer,et al.  A Procedure for Surveying Personal Networks , 1978 .

[5]  E. I. Pas.  The Effect of Selected Sociodemographic Characteristics on Daily Travel-Activity Behavior , 1984 .

[6]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Social factors in future travel: an assessment , 2006 .

[7]  Matthew J. Roorda,et al.  Prototype Model of Household Activity-Travel Scheduling , 2003 .

[8]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[9]  Timo Ohnmacht,et al.  Leisure mobility styles in Swiss conurbations: construction and empirical analysis , 2009 .

[10]  P. Mokhtarian,et al.  Subjective assessments of personal mobility: What makes the difference between a little and a lot? , 2007 .

[11]  Social factors in future travel: A qualitative assessment , 2010 .

[12]  Margaret Grieco,et al.  Scatters and clusters in time and space: implications for delivering integrated and inclusive transport , 2003 .

[13]  Torsten Hägerstraand.  WHAT ABOUT PEOPLE IN REGIONAL SCIENCE , 1970 .

[14]  J. Urry,et al.  The New Mobilities Paradigm , 2006 .

[15]  F. Grin,et al.  Language‐based earnings differentials on the Swiss labour market: is Italian a liability? , 1998 .

[16]  Vincent Kaufmann,et al.  Motility: Mobility as capital , 2004 .

[17]  James H. Liu,et al.  Distance Matters: Physical Space and Social Impact , 1995 .

[18]  Joan L. Walker,et al.  Discrete choice with social and spatial network interdependencies: An empirical example using mixed generalized extreme value models with field and panel effects , 2005 .

[19]  Eric J Miller,et al.  Collecting Social Network Data to Study Social Activity-Travel Behavior: An Egocentric Approach , 2008 .

[20]  Martin Lanzendorf,et al.  Mobility Styles and Travel Behavior: Application of a Lifestyle Approach to Leisure Travel , 2002 .

[21]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Networks, biographies and travel: First empirical and methodological results , 2006 .

[22]  H. Gunn,et al.  SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL TRANSFERABILITY OF RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN TRAVEL DEMAND, TRIP COST AND TRAVEL TIME , 2001 .

[23]  K. Axhausen.  Social Networks, Mobility Biographies, and Travel: Survey Challenges , 2008 .

[24]  Keith N. Hampton,et al.  Long Distance Community in the Network Society , 2001 .

[25]  Peter Jones,et al.  Recent advances in travel demand analysis , 1983 .

[26]  K. Axhausen,et al.  Activity Spaces, Biographies, Social Networks and their Welfare Gains and Externalities: Some Hypotheses and Empirical Results , 2005 .

[27]  J. Urry,et al.  COORDINATING FACE-TO-FACE MEETINGS IN MOBILE NETWORK SOCIETIES , 2008 .

[28]  R. Kitamura,et al.  TEMPORAL STABILITY OF URBAN TRAVEL PATTERNS , 1984 .

[29]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.

[30]  Ta Theo Arentze,et al.  Social Networks, Choices, Mobility, and Travel , 2008 .

[31]  A. Sica.  Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition, and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order.By Ulrich Beck, Anthony Giddens, and Scott Lash. Polity Press and Stanford University Press, 1995. 225 pp. Cloth, $37.50; paper, $14.50 , 1997 .

[32]  H Roberts,et al.  Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity , 1994 .

[33]  Debbie A. Niemeier,et al.  Measuring Accessibility: An Exploration of Issues and Alternatives , 1997 .

[34]  Steven Farber,et al.  My car, my friends, and me: a preliminary analysis of automobility and social activity participation , 2009 .

[35]  Ronald S. Burt,et al.  Network items and the general social survey , 1984 .

[36]  W. Galston.  Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community , 2001 .

[37]  P. Kanaroglou,et al.  AN ACTIVITY-EPISODE GENERATION MODEL THAT CAPTURES INTERACTIONS BETWEEN HOUSEHOLD HEADS: DEVELOPMENT AND EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS , 2002 .

[38]  Timothy J Tardiff.  COMPARISON OF EFFECTIVENESS OF VARIOUS MEASURES OF SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS IN MODELS OF TRANSPORTATION BEHAVIOR , 1975 .

[39]  Ram M. Pendyala,et al.  Understanding Travel Time Expenditures Around the World: Exploring the Notion of a Travel Time Frontier , 2007 .

[40]  T. Schwanen,et al.  Exploring the Juggling of Responsibilities with Space-Time Accessibility Analysis , 2008 .

[41]  M. Bergman.  A Theoretical Note on the Differences Between Attitudes, Opinions, and Values , 1998 .