Clear cell renal cell carcinoma: contrast-enhanced ultrasound features relation to tumor size.

OBJECTIVES To analyze the contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) features of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC) in relation to tumor size. MATERIALS AND METHODS The CEUS appearance of 92 CCRCCs confirmed pathologically were retrospectively analyzed. Tumor size was stratified into six groups with a 1cm interval. For each lesion, the degree of enhancement, the homogeneity of enhancement and the presence of pseudocapsule sign were evaluated and compared with the pathologic findings. RESULTS The tumors of groups I-VI were counted for 13, 26, 21, 11, 10 and 11, respectively. All the CCRCCs mainly showed a marked enhancement, and there was no statistically significance between the degree of enhancement and tumor size (P>0.05). However, both homogeneity of enhancement and frequency of pseudocapsule correlated well with the tumor size (P<0.01). Homogeneous enhancement was shown in 85%, 65%, 19%, 9%, 0% and 0% of the tumors in the six groups, respectively. In tumors < or =3cm the frequency (72%) of homogeneity was significantly higher than in tumors >3cm (9%; P<0.01). The detection rate of pseudocapsule sign in the six group was 23%, 62%, 71%, 64%, 50% and 0%, respectively. The frequency of pseudocapsule sign was significantly higher in tumors 2.1-5cm than <2cm and >5cm (66%, 23%, 24%, respectively; P<0.01). On the pathologic examinations, the mean MVD was significantly higher in marked enhancement tumors than slight enhancement tumors (46.0+/-15.9, 27.5+/-8.3, respectively; P<0.01). Any tumors with a heterogeneous enhancement pattern were accompanied by intratumoral necrosis or cysts on histologic specimen. A pseudocapsule was seen at pathology in all the 46 cases with perilesional enhancement and 4 of 46 tumors without perilesional enhancement at CEUS. CONCLUSION CEUS features of CCRCCs vary with the size of the tumor, especially in the homogeneity of enhancement and the presence of pseudocapsule sign. CEUS is effective in demonstrating the sonographic visualization of tumoral characteristics.

[1]  E. Quaia,et al.  Characterization of renal tumours with pulse inversion harmonic imaging by intermittent high mechanical index technique: initial results , 2003, European Radiology.

[2]  C. Roy,et al.  Significance of the pseudocapsule on MRI of renal neoplasms and its potential application for local staging: a retrospective study. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  M. Jinzaki,et al.  Double-Phase Helical CT of Small Renal Parenchymal Neoplasms: Correlation with Pathologic Findings and Tumor Angiogenesis , 2000, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[4]  J. Cheville,et al.  Comparisons of Outcome and Prognostic Features Among Histologic Subtypes of Renal Cell Carcinoma , 2003, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[5]  Carlo Magno,et al.  Contrast-enhanced second-harmonic sonography in the detection of pseudocapsule in renal cell carcinoma. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  M Takahashi,et al.  Detection of pseudocapsule of renal cell carcinoma with MR imaging and CT. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  P. Pickhardt,et al.  From the Archives of the AFIP: Infiltrative Renal Lesions: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation , 2000 .

[8]  J. J. de la Rosette,et al.  Ultrasonography of renal masses using contrast pulse sequence imaging: a pilot study. , 2007, Journal of endourology.

[9]  Jie Tang,et al.  Contrast‐Enhanced Ultrasonography for Assessment of Tumor Vascularity in Hepatocellular Carcinoma , 2007, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[10]  Y. Yamashita,et al.  Small renal cell carcinoma: pathologic and radiologic correlation. , 1992, Radiology.

[11]  E. Belgrano,et al.  The application of ultrasound contrast agents in the characterization of renal tumors , 2004, World Journal of Urology.

[12]  J. Chmiel,et al.  Renal cell carcinoma: tumor size, stage and survival. Members of the Cancer Incidence and End Results Committee. , 1995, The Journal of urology.

[13]  I. Sesterhenn,et al.  World health organization classifications of tumours. pathology and genetics of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs , 2005 .

[14]  J. Correas,et al.  [Feasability of real time contrast enhanced ultrasound in renal disease]. , 2004, Journal de radiologie.

[15]  J. Chmiel,et al.  Original Articles: Kidney Cancer: Renal Cell Carcinoma: Tumor Size, Stage and Survival , 1995 .

[16]  J. Folkman,et al.  Tumor angiogenesis and metastasis--correlation in invasive breast carcinoma. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  M. Falconi,et al.  Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography Better Identifies Pancreatic Tumor Vascularization than Helical CT , 2005, Pancreatology.

[18]  C. Muir,et al.  Human cancer: epidemiology and environmental causes: Kidney and renal pelvis , 1992 .

[19]  G. Krinsky,et al.  Small renal parenchymal neoplasms: further observations on growth. , 1995, Radiology.

[20]  J. Correas,et al.  Étude de faisabilité de l’échographie de contraste en temps réel dans la pathologie rénale , 2004 .

[21]  L. Thorelius.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for extrahepatic lesions: preliminary experience. , 2004, European journal of radiology.