Signal‐to‐noise ratio effects in quantitative cerebral perfusion using dynamic susceptibility contrast agents

Theoretical and simulation evidence is presented in support of the idea that the optimal manner of determining blood flow from MR perfusion studies is not necessarily obtained by setting experimental conditions to maximize either the arterial input or the measured tissue concentration level for a particular echo time (TE). The noise power in the contrast concentration curve is associated with its peak because of the nonlinear relationship between the contrast concentration and MR signal intensity curves. The optimum signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR), SNRC, for a particular contrast concentration curve can be obtained when the experimental concentration level and TE are adjusted to produce an MR intensity curve whose signal loss is 63% of the precontrast MR signal intensity. It is demonstrated that the stability of the singular valued decomposition (SVD) deconvolution approach to determine blood flow parameters is increased when the tissue curve maximum signal loss is in the range of 40–80%. The accuracy and stability of the SVD‐determined blood flow parameters are affected by deviations from these optimum conditions in a manner that depends on the mean transit time (MTT) associated with the residue function. It is recommended that the experimental TE value be set so that neither the tissue nor the arterial curves are placed a region of rapidly deteriorating SNRC. Magn Reson Med 49:122–128, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  R Frayne,et al.  Determination of optimal injection parameters for intraarterial gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. , 2000, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[2]  D. Gadian,et al.  Delay and dispersion effects in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: Simulations using singular value decomposition , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  F. Ståhlberg,et al.  Assessment of regional cerebral blood flow by dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI using different deconvolution techniques , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  M. Viergever,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation of cerebral blood flow in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  D L Parker,et al.  Optimized visualization of vessels in contrast enhanced intracranial MR angiography , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  B. Rosen,et al.  High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages. Part II: Experimental comparison and preliminary results , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  B. Rosen,et al.  High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages. Part I: Mathematical approach and statistical analysis , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  W. J. Lorenz,et al.  Quantification of regional cerebral blood flow and volume with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR imaging. , 1994, Radiology.

[9]  J. Fike,et al.  A deconvolution method for evaluating indicator-dilution curves. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  M. Smith,et al.  An unbiased signal-to-noise ratio measure for magnetic resonance images. , 1993, Medical physics.

[11]  R. Henkelman Erratum: Measurement of signal intensities in the presence of noise in MR images [Med. Phys. 12, 232 (1985)] , 1986 .

[12]  S. T. Nichols,et al.  Application of ARMA Modeling to Multicomponent Signals , 1985 .

[13]  R. Henkelman Measurement of signal intensities in the presence of noise in MR images. , 1985, Medical physics.

[14]  J. J. Murphy,et al.  System parameter identification in transport models using the fast Fourier transform (FFT). , 1981, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[15]  F. Harris On the use of windows for harmonic analysis with the discrete Fourier transform , 1978, Proceedings of the IEEE.