Self-motion trajectories can facilitate orientation based figure-ground segregation.

Segregation of objects from the background is a basic and essential property of the visual system. Here we studied the neural detection of objects defined by orientation difference from background in barn owls (Tyto alba). We presented wide-field displays of densely packed stripes with a dominant orientation. Visual objects were created by orienting a circular patch differently from the background. In head fixed conditions, neurons in both tecto- and thalamo- fugal visual pathways (optic tectum and visual Wulst) were weakly responsive to these objects in their receptive fields. However, notably, in free viewing conditions, barn owls occasionally perform peculiar side to side head motions (peering) when scanning the environment. In the second part of the study we thus recorded the neural response from head fixed owls while the visual displays replicated the peering conditions, i.e., the displays (objects and backgrounds) were shifted along trajectories that induced a retinal motion identical to sampled peering motions when viewing a static object. These conditions induced dramatic neural responses to the objects, in the very same neurons that where unresponsive to the objects in static displays. By reverting to circular motions of the display, we show that the pattern of the neural response is mostly shaped by the orientation of the background relative to motion and not the orientation of the object. Thus, our findings provide evidence that peering and/or other self-motions can facilitate orientation-based figure-ground segregation through interaction with inhibition from the surround.

[1]  H. Nothdurft Salience from feature contrast: variations with texture density , 2000, Vision Research.

[2]  Harald Luksch,et al.  Processing of motion stimuli by cells in the optic tectum of chickens , 2015, Neuroreport.

[3]  David Kleinfeld,et al.  Active sensation: insights from the rodent vibrissa sensorimotor system , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[4]  Harald Luksch,et al.  Cytoarchitecture of the Avian Optic Tectum: Neuronal Substrate for Cellular Computation , 2003, Reviews in the neurosciences.

[5]  J. Letelier,et al.  A Cholinergic Gating Mechanism Controlled by Competitive Interactions in the Optic Tectum of the Pigeon , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  E. Knudsen,et al.  Rules of Competitive Stimulus Selection in a Cholinergic Isthmic Nucleus of the Owl Midbrain , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  Hermann Wagner,et al.  From optics to attention: visual perception in barn owls , 2011, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[8]  Hermann Wagner,et al.  Responses of Tectal Neurons to Contrasting Stimuli: An Electrophysiological Study in the Barn Owl , 2012, PloS one.

[9]  B. Khang,et al.  Apparent Relative Motion from a Checkerboard Surround , 1997, Perception.

[10]  Lothar Spillmann,et al.  The Ōuchi-Spillmann Illusion Revisited , 2013, Perception.

[11]  Christopher D. Carello,et al.  Target selection and the superior colliculus: goals, choices and hypotheses , 2004, Vision Research.

[12]  Victor A. F. Lamme,et al.  Contextual Modulation in Primary Visual Cortex , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  H. Wagner,et al.  Horizontal-disparity tuning of neurons in the visual forebrain of the behaving barn owl. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  Hermann Wagner,et al.  Night vision in barn owls: visual acuity and contrast sensitivity under dark adaptation. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[15]  H. Wagner,et al.  Sound-localization deficits induced by lesions in the barn owl's auditory space map [published erratum appears in J Neurosci 1993 Apr;13(4):following table of contents] , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[16]  Eric I. Knudsen,et al.  A shared inhibitory circuit for both exogenous and endogenous control of stimulus selection , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  E. J. Woods,et al.  Adaptation and habituation characteristics of tectal neurons in the pigeon , 1977, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  Eric I. Knudsen,et al.  Auditory and Visual Space Maps in the Cholinergic Nucleus Isthmi Pars Parvocellularis of the Barn Owl , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  Hermann Wagner,et al.  Depth generalization from stereo to motion parallax in the owl , 2002, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[20]  Ehud Rivlin,et al.  On the barn owl’s visual pre-attack behavior: I. Structure of head movements and motion patterns , 2006, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[21]  Ohad Ben-Shahar,et al.  Overt attention toward oriented objects in free-viewing barn owls , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Stephen A. Baccus,et al.  Segregation of object and background motion in the retina , 2003, Nature.

[23]  Hermann Wagner,et al.  Behavioral Evidence and Neural Correlates of Perceptual Grouping by Motion in the Barn Owl , 2018, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  Stephen A. Baccus,et al.  A Retinal Circuit That Computes Object Motion , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  B. J. Frost,et al.  The processing of object and self-motion in the tectofugal and accessory optic pathways of birds , 1990, Vision Research.

[26]  Lothar Spillmann,et al.  Hajime Ōuchi – a mystery resolved , 2016, Perception.

[27]  Hermann Wagner,et al.  Visual-auditory integration for visual search: a behavioral study in barn owls , 2015, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[28]  Jing Samantha Pan,et al.  Breaking camouflage and detecting targets require optic flow and image structure information. , 2017, Applied optics.

[29]  J. Findlay Active vision: Visual activity in everyday life , 1998, Current Biology.

[30]  R. Segev,et al.  Orientation saliency without visual cortex and target selection in archer fish , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  Ohad Ben-Shahar,et al.  Visual pop-out in barn owls: Human-like behavior in the avian brain. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[32]  Andreas Nieder,et al.  Miniature stereo radio transmitter for simultaneous recording of multiple single-neuron signals from behaving owls , 2000, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[33]  Hermann Wagner,et al.  Spatial contrast sensitivity and grating acuity of barn owls. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[34]  D. Burr,et al.  Temporal Coding of Visual Space , 2018, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[35]  J. Pettigrew,et al.  Neurons selective for orientation and binocular disparity in the visual Wulst of the barn owl (Tyto alba). , 1976, Science.

[36]  R. Wessel,et al.  Contextual interaction of GABAergic circuitry with dynamic synapses. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[37]  Ohad Ben-Shahar,et al.  What pops out for you pops out for fish: Four common visual features. , 2019, Journal of vision.

[38]  E. Knudsen,et al.  Signaling of the Strongest Stimulus in the Owl Optic Tectum , 2011, Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  H. Wagner,et al.  Perception and neuronal coding of subjective contours in the owl , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[40]  G. Mandl Responses of visual cells in cat superior colliculus to relative pattern movement , 1985, Vision Research.

[41]  Eric I. Knudsen,et al.  Gated Visual Input to the Central Auditory System , 2002, Science.

[42]  Juan Carlos Letelier,et al.  Attentional Capture? Synchronized Feedback Signals from the Isthmi Boost Retinal Signals to Higher Visual Areas , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[43]  D. B. Bender,et al.  Selectivity for relative motion in the monkey superior colliculus. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[44]  Hermann Wagner,et al.  Responses to Pop-Out Stimuli in the Barn Owl's Optic Tectum Can Emerge through Stimulus-Specific Adaptation , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  Shreesh P. Mysore,et al.  Combinatorial Neural Inhibition for Stimulus Selection across Space , 2018, bioRxiv.

[46]  Eric I. Knudsen,et al.  Global Inhibition and Stimulus Competition in the Owl Optic Tectum , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[47]  Austin Roorda,et al.  Benefits of retinal image motion at the limits of spatial vision , 2017, Journal of vision.

[48]  Lihi Zelnik-Manor,et al.  From biokinematics to a robotic active vision system , 2017, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[49]  H. Karten,et al.  Columnar projections from the cholinergic nucleus isthmi to the optic tectum in chicks (Gallus gallus): A possible substrate for synchronizing tectal channels , 2006, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[50]  Laurent Itti,et al.  Superior colliculus encodes visual saliency before the primary visual cortex , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[51]  J. Pettigrew,et al.  The distribution of neurons projecting from the retina and visual cortex to the thalamus and tectum opticum of the barn owl, Tyto alba, and the burrowing owl, Speotyto cunicularia , 1981, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[52]  Thomas Wachtler,et al.  Non-linear retinal processing supports invariance during fixational eye movements , 2016, Vision Research.

[53]  Mandyam V. Srinivasan,et al.  Active vision in honeybees: Task-oriented suppression of an innate behaviour , 1994, Vision Research.

[54]  H. Karten,et al.  Morphology and connections of nucleus isthmi pars magnocellularis in chicks (Gallus gallus) , 2004, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[55]  E I Knudsen,et al.  Neural maps of head movement vector and speed in the optic tectum of the barn owl. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[56]  Y. Gutfreund,et al.  Saliency mapping in the optic tectum and its relationship to habituation , 2014, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[57]  Shay Ohayon,et al.  Multiple manifestations of microstimulation in the optic tectum: eye movements, pupil dilations, and sensory priming. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[58]  Sten Grillner,et al.  Tectal microcircuit generating visual selection commands on gaze-controlling neurons , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[59]  Chandramouli Chandrasekaran,et al.  Computational principles and models of multisensory integration , 2017, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[60]  E. Knudsen Auditory and visual maps of space in the optic tectum of the owl , 1982, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[61]  Ehud Ahissar,et al.  1-D Vision: Encoding of Eye Movements by Simple Receptive Fields , 2015, Perception.

[62]  Y. Gutfreund,et al.  Stimulus-Specific Adaptations in the Gaze Control System of the Barn Owl , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[63]  Dora E Angelaki,et al.  The neural basis of depth perception from motion parallax , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[64]  Eric I. Knudsen,et al.  Space-Specific Deficits in Visual Orientation Discrimination Caused by Lesions in the Midbrain Stimulus Selection Network , 2017, Current Biology.