Effects of vehicle bumper height and impact velocity on type of lower extremity injury in vehicle-pedestrian accidents.

In nonfatal passenger vehicle-pedestrian accidents, the lower extremities are the most commonly injured body parts. The European Enhanced Vehicle-safety Committee Working Group 17 (EEVC/WG17) pedestrian subsystem test method using a legform impactor has been developed mainly for evaluation of aggressiveness of the front bumper of passenger vehicles. However, in recent years the number of sports utility vehicles (SUV) with a high bumper has been rapidly increasing. Since the bumper height is different between a passenger vehicle and an SUV, the type of lower extremity injury may be different. The type of lower extremity injury caused by this different bumper height should be clarified, because the test method and vehicle safety countermeasure must take into account a certain type of injury. Furthermore, the effect of vehicle impact velocity on the type of lower extremity injury in vehicle-pedestrian accidents has not been investigated so far. Therefore, the objective of this study is to clarify the effect of vehicle bumper height and vehicle impact velocity on the type of lower extremity injury in vehicle-pedestrian accidents. The Pedestrian Crash Data Study (PCDS), an in-depth accident database in the USA, was used for the current analyses. The results indicate that the type of injury, i.e., to the tibia and knee ligament, could become an injury to the femur with an increase in bumper height. Furthermore, the main injury at an impact velocity of around 20-30km/h is to the knee ligament. On the other hand, the main injury at an impact velocity of around 40km/h is a fracture of the lower extremities.

[1]  Yasuhiro Matsui.  Evaluation of Pedestrian Subsystem Test Method Using Legform and Upper Legform Impactors for Assessment of High-Bumper Vehicle Aggressiveness , 2004, Traffic injury prevention.

[2]  Yasuhiro Matsui,et al.  Injury Pattern and Response of Human Thigh under Lateral Loading Simulating Car-Pedestrian Impact , 2004 .

[3]  J. Kajzer,et al.  CAR-PEDESTRIAN ACCIDENTS IN GOTHENBURG DURING TEN YEARS , 1998 .

[4]  Graham J. L. Lawrence.  PEDESTRIAN SAFETY TESTING USING THE EEVC PEDESTRIAN IMPACTORS , 1998 .

[5]  Y Ishikawa Matsui,et al.  Validation of pedestrian upper legform impact test - reconstruction of pedestrian accidents , 1998 .

[6]  Jason R. Kerrigan,et al.  Experiments for establishing pedestrian-impact lower limb injury criteria , 2003 .

[7]  Jason R. Kerrigan,et al.  EVALUATION OF THE RESPONSE OF MECHANICAL PEDESTRIAN KNEE JOINT IMPACTORS IN BENDING AND SHEAR LOADING , 2003 .

[8]  Yasuhiro Matsui.  New injury reference values determined for TRL legform impactor from accident reconstruction test , 2003 .

[9]  Y Matsui.  Biofidelity of TRL Legform Impactor and Injury Tolerance of the Human Leg in Lateral Impact. , 2001, Stapp car crash journal.

[10]  Patricia C Dischinger,et al.  Pedestrian injuries and vehicle type in Maryland, 1995-1999. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  Jason R. Kerrigan,et al.  Dynamic Response Corridors and Injury Thresholds of the Pedestrian Lower Extremities , 2004 .

[12]  B S Roudsari,et al.  Pedestrian crashes: higher injury severity and mortality rate for light truck vehicles compared with passenger vehicles , 2004, Injury Prevention.