Flow in VR: A Study on the Relationships Between Preconditions, Experience and Continued Use

Flow is characterized as an autotelic experience where action and awareness merge, there is high concentration on task and little attention is paid to time or self. It is believed that VR has a powerful affordance for inducing the flow state, as VR is, at least anecdotally, a technology that transports users to immersive realities, which can facilitate flow. However, VR imposes usability challenges that may inhibit flow. This research investigates flow in VR and its characteristics, determinants and outcomes through a survey (n = 681) and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). The results indicate that flow in VR is positively association with intentions to continue VR use and longer VR sessions.

[1]  A. Kluger,et al.  The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. , 1996 .

[2]  R. Eklund,et al.  Assessing Flow in Physical Activity: The Flow State Scale-2 and Dispositional Flow Scale-2 , 2002 .

[3]  Carrie Heater,et al.  Being There: The Subjective Experience of Presence , 1992, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[4]  Peter A. Rosen,et al.  Hedonic Information Systems: Acceptance of Social Networking Websites , 2006, AMCIS.

[5]  Jodi Asbell-Clarke,et al.  Challenging games help students learn: An empirical study on engagement, flow and immersion in game-based learning , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[6]  Lin Lin,et al.  Can an Integrated System of Electroencephalography and Virtual Reality Further the Understanding of Relationships Between Attention, Meditation, Flow State, and Creativity? , 2019 .

[7]  John C. Hart,et al.  The CAVE: audio visual experience automatic virtual environment , 1992, CACM.

[8]  M. Csíkszentmihályi.  Flow and the Foundations of Positive Psychology , 2014 .

[9]  Hans van der Heijden,et al.  User Acceptance of Hedonic Information Systems , 2004, MIS Q..

[10]  Daehwan Kim,et al.  The impact of virtual reality (VR) technology on sport spectators' flow experience and satisfaction , 2019, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[11]  T. Grodal.  Video Games and the Pleasure of Control , 2000 .

[12]  M. Shamim Hossain,et al.  Estimating VR Sickness and user experience using different HMD technologies: An evaluation study , 2019, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[13]  David J. Shernoff,et al.  Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. , 2003 .

[14]  Chris Barker,et al.  Research Methods in Clinical Psychology: An Introduction for Students and Practitioners , 2002 .

[15]  William G. Volante,et al.  Time Flies: Investigating Duration Judgments in Virtual Reality , 2018, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting.

[16]  Peter M. Bentler,et al.  Practical Issues in Structural Modeling , 1987 .

[17]  Mel Slater,et al.  Enhancing Our Lives with Immersive Virtual Reality , 2016, Front. Robot. AI.

[18]  Mehdi Bennis,et al.  Toward Interconnected Virtual Reality: Opportunities, Challenges, and Enablers , 2016, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[19]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Extending technology usage models to interactive hedonic technologies: a theoretical model and empirical test , 2010, Inf. Syst. J..

[20]  Chongsan Kwon,et al.  Verification of the possibility and effectiveness of experiential learning using HMD-based immersive VR technologies , 2018, Virtual Reality.

[21]  Tobias Greitemeyer,et al.  The impact of immersion on the perception of pornography: A virtual reality study , 2019, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[22]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[23]  Alain Pinsonneault,et al.  Survey Research Methodology in Management Information Systems: An Assessment , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[24]  M. Csíkszentmihályi.  Beyond boredom and anxiety , 1975 .

[25]  Marianna Sigala,et al.  The application and impact of gamification funware on trip planning and experiences: the case of TripAdvisor’s funware , 2015, Electron. Mark..

[26]  M. Kempton,et al.  Virtual reality in the psychological treatment for mental health problems: An systematic review of recent evidence , 2016, Psychiatry Research.

[27]  J. Egbert.  A study of flow theory in the foreign language classroom , 2003 .

[28]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  The Concept of Flow , 2014 .

[29]  M. Appelbaum,et al.  Psychometric methods. , 1989, Annual review of psychology.

[30]  Dieter Kranzlmuller,et al.  State of the art of virtual reality technology , 2016, 2016 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[31]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic - Mail Emotion/Adoption Study , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[32]  Juho Hamari,et al.  How motivational feedback increases user's benefits and continued use: A study on gamification, quantified-self and social networking , 2019, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[33]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology , 2012, MIS Q..

[34]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet , 2011 .

[35]  Juho Hamari,et al.  International Journal of Information Management Why Do People Use Gamification Services? , 2022 .

[36]  David F. Larcker,et al.  Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics: , 1981 .

[37]  Jenova Chen,et al.  Flow in games (and everything else) , 2007, CACM.

[38]  A. Kluger,et al.  Feedback Interventions , 1998 .

[39]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions , 2008, Decis. Sci..

[40]  Dario tom Dieck,et al.  Tourists’ virtual reality adoption: an exploratory study from Lake District National Park , 2018 .

[41]  Fay Fransella,et al.  Personality : theory, measurement, and research , 1981 .

[42]  S. Geisser.  A predictive approach to the random effect model , 1974 .

[43]  Michela Ott,et al.  A LITERATURE REVIEW ON IMMERSIVE VIRTUAL REALITY IN EDUCATION: STATE OF THE ART AND PERSPECTIVES. , 2015, 11th International Conference eLearning and Software for Education.

[44]  M. Csíkszentmihályi.  Toward a Psychology of Optimal Experience , 2014 .

[45]  Juho Hamari,et al.  Measuring flow in gamification: Dispositional Flow Scale-2 , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[46]  P. Vorderer,et al.  Media entertainment: The psychology of its appeal. , 2000 .

[47]  J. Webster,et al.  The Dimensionality and Correlates of Flow in Human-Computer Interactions. , 1993 .

[48]  Donna L. Hoffman,et al.  Measuring the Customer Experience in Online Environments: A Structural Modeling Approach , 2000 .

[49]  Henrik M. Peperkorn,et al.  The impact of perception and presence on emotional reactions: a review of research in virtual reality , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[50]  Konrad Pesudovs,et al.  The development of a symptom questionnaire for assessing virtual reality viewing using a head-mounted display. , 2005, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[51]  J. Bailenson,et al.  Building long-term empathy: A large-scale comparison of traditional and virtual reality perspective-taking , 2018, PloS one.

[52]  Darryl Charles,et al.  Toward an understanding of flow in video games , 2008, CIE.

[53]  EXPLORING THE USEFULNESS OF THE DISPOSITIONAL FLOW SCALE FOR OUTDOOR RECREATION ACTIVITIES , 2006 .