Cracking the Climate Change Conundrum with Derivatives

With short-term and seasonal variations filtered out, the data for the climate is closer to stationary, predictable for some time in the future and can be approximated with a Markov process, thus demonstrating that climate and weather time series exhibit differing characteristics. Hence, based on statistical analysis of the temperature time series, we consider an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process for the dynamics of the global mean temperature and propose a realistic new semi-empirical model for estimating the global sea level response. We then use the concept of absence of arbitrage opportunities and define a simple pricing rule with stochastic interest rates for evaluating climate derivatives. Finally, we discuss three financial products that enable different parties who feel vulnerable to climate change to hedge their risks or shoulder additional risks where a cost-benefit advantage exists, and we describe their pricing formula. We first consider a digital coupon swap allowing two parties to bet on sea level rise at different fixing time and then introduce a climate default swap providing a party with protection against a rise in the sea-level where the default is the first passage time of an up barrier. As a special case, we look at the pricing of a climate default bond or nature-linked bond. Copyright © 2010 Wilmott Magazine Ltd.

[1]  Boualem Djehiche,et al.  On modelling and pricing weather derivatives , 2002 .

[2]  S. Rahmstorf,et al.  Global sea level linked to global temperature , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Anastasios A. Tsonis,et al.  ANTI-PERSISTENCE IN THE GLOBAL TEMPERATURE ANOMALY FIELD , 2007 .

[4]  David M. Kreps,et al.  Martingales and arbitrage in multiperiod securities markets , 1979 .

[5]  Jim W. Hall,et al.  Sea-level rise: coastal impacts and responses , 2006 .

[6]  M. Collins,et al.  The internal climate variability of HadCM3, a version of the Hadley Centre coupled model without flux adjustments , 2001 .

[7]  Anny Cazenave,et al.  Recent Climate Observations Compared to Projections , 2007, Science.

[8]  Sebastiaan N. Jonkman,et al.  Cost benefit analysis and flood damage mitigation in the Netherlands , 2004 .

[9]  Eduardo S. Schwartz,et al.  A Simple Approach to Valuing Risky Fixed and Floating Rate Debt , 1995 .

[10]  Planning for Sea Level Rise and Shore Protection Under Climate Uncertainty , 1997 .

[11]  N. White,et al.  A 20th century acceleration in global sea‐level rise , 2006 .

[12]  A. Bunde,et al.  Trend evaluation in records with long‐term memory: Application to global warming , 2009 .

[13]  Chin Y. Kuo,et al.  Greenhouse Effect, Sea Level Rise, and Coastal Drainage Systems , 1987 .

[14]  Oleg O. Ribak Statistical structure of air surface temperature time series , 2009 .

[15]  Gary Yohe,et al.  To Hedge or Not Against an Uncertain Climate Future? , 2004, Science.

[16]  D. Heath,et al.  Bond Pricing and the Term Structure of Interest Rates: A Discrete Time Approximation , 1990, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[17]  H. Stern Evaluating the cost of protecting against global climate change: Options pricing theory and weather derivatives , 2005 .

[18]  R. Hanson Could gambling save science? Encouraging an honest consensus , 1995 .

[19]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate change 2001 : the scientific basis , 2001 .

[20]  A. H. Gordon Global Warming as a Manifestation of a Random Walk , 1991 .

[21]  V. Linetsky Computing Hitting Time Densities for CIR and OU Diffusions: Applications to Mean-Reverting Models , 2004 .