Investigation of the Impact of Abrasion as a Concrete Crosstie Rail Seat Deterioration (RSD) Mechanism

To meet the demands of increasing freight axle loads and cumulative gross tonnages, and high-speed passenger rail development in North America, the performance and service life of concrete railway crossties must be improved. According to a railway industry survey conducted by the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC), rail seat deterioration (RSD) was identified as one of the primary factors limiting concrete crosstie service life. While previous research at UIUC focused on the moisture-driven mechanisms of RSD, the purpose of this study is to define and characterize abrasion in order to understand the criticality of abrasion as a failure mechanism. Abrasion is widely considered to be a viable mechanism leading to RSD; nonetheless, a lack of understanding of the complex properties affecting abrasion has resulted in a highly iterative design process for concrete crossties and fastening systems. When combined with abrasive fines and water that penetrate into the rail seat and pad interface, the frictional forces and relative movement of the concrete crosstie and fastening system equate to a seemingly ideal situation for the occurrence of abrasive wear. This paper includes an investigation of the tribological properties at the interface of the rail seat and pad and preliminary results from an experimental evaluation of the parameters that are believed to affect the rate of abrasion. By identifying the parameters that contribute to RSD, UIUC’s research will seek to mitigate the effects of abrasion with an overall goal of improving the performance of concrete crossties.

[1]  Sandor Popovics,et al.  Concrete Materials: Properties, Specifications, and Testing , 1992 .

[2]  David A Lange,et al.  Investigation of Potential Concrete Tie Rail Seat Deterioration Mechanisms: Cavitation Erosion and Hydraulic Pressure Cracking , 2010 .

[3]  John C. Zeman Hydraulic Mechanisms of Concrete-Tie Rail Seat Deterioration , 2010 .

[4]  K. Turk,et al.  Abrasion resistance and mechanical properties of self-compacting concrete with different dosages of fly ash/silica fume , 2011 .

[6]  T. Fwa,et al.  Laboratory Evaluation of Wet and Dry Abrasion Resistance of Cement Mortar , 1990 .

[7]  John Choros,et al.  Prevention of derailments due to concrete tie rail seat deterioration , 2007 .

[8]  J. Riley Edwards,et al.  Design and Performance of Elastic Fastening System Assemblies and Measurement of Rail Seat Pressure Distribution forConcrete Sleepers for Heavy-Haul Service , 2011 .

[9]  Ch Best,et al.  Significance of Tests and Properties of Concrete and Concrete-Making Materials , 1978 .

[10]  M. Godet The third-body approach: A mechanical view of wear , 1984 .

[11]  K. Bakke Chapter 18: Abrasion Resistance , 2006 .

[12]  K. Khayat,et al.  Testing Abrasion Resistance of High-Strength Concrete , 2001 .

[13]  Cengiz Duran Atiş,et al.  HIGH VOLUME FLY ASH ABRASION RESISTANT CONCRETE , 2002 .

[14]  R. A. Burton,et al.  Principles of Tribology , 1977 .

[15]  Joseph F. Lamond,et al.  Significance of Tests and Properties of Concrete and Concrete-Making Materials , 1994 .