Insertion of Surprise Elements in the Collaborative Learning Process through Graphic Representations for Synthesis (GRS): A Qualitative Study

Designers are motivated to the collaboration during professional practice and throughout college graduation years. However, during postgraduation in Design, students start having research work and, usually, a learning of theoretical subjects only through personal scope. With the goal of suggesting changes to such practice methodologies, this study aims to draw attention to a significant learning of theoretical classes in Design postgraduation, through visual thinking and collaboration principles. For such deed, it's being proposed as a didactic strategy the use of Graphic Representations for Synthesis (GRS) produced in groups within the classroom. This work presents a qualitative study, in which the production process, analysis and discussion of GRS developed collaboratively by students during the classes of UCD was investigated. Results have shown that the uses of GRS have supported students' learning and, the insertion of the surprise elements in the production of the GRS have brought substantial gains in this process.

[1]  C. A. Owen,et al.  The role of organisational context in mediating workplace learning and performance , 2001, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[2]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  Knowledge Building: Theory, Pedagogy, and Technology , 2006 .

[3]  Masaki Suwa,et al.  Thinking with Sketches , 2009 .

[4]  Martin J. Eppler,et al.  Sketching at Work : a guide to visual problem solving and communication for managers, consultants, sales professionals, trainers and facilitators , 2010 .

[5]  Aurélio B. B. Ferreira,et al.  Novo dicionário Aurélio da língua portuguesa , 2009 .

[6]  Martin J. Eppler,et al.  Sketching at Work , 2017 .

[7]  Bill Buxton,et al.  Sketching User Experiences: Getting the Design Right and the Right Design , 2007 .

[8]  J. Offer Mind and Society , 1988, Vygotsky and the Social Formation of Mind.

[9]  Bernard L. Simonin The Importance of Collaborative Know-How: An Empirical Test of the Learning Organization , 1997 .

[10]  Paul Rodgers,et al.  Visible ideas:Information patterns of conceptual sketch activity , 1998 .

[11]  Gurparkash Singh,et al.  Collaborative knowledge building process: an activity theory analysis , 2009 .

[12]  Masaki Suwa,et al.  What do architects and students perceive in their design sketches? A protocol analysis , 1997 .

[13]  Liang Y Liu,et al.  Verification and validation of a project collaboration tool , 2008 .

[14]  Dan Roam,et al.  The Back of the Napkin: Solving Problems and Selling Ideas with Pictures , 2008 .

[15]  Carlos Caldeira,et al.  Group Cognition: Computer Support for Building Collaborative Knowledge (Acting with Technology) , 2006 .

[16]  Visual Thinking: Let Them See What You Are Saying , 1997 .

[17]  Beau Jones,et al.  Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction , 1990 .