Integrated bank performance assessment and management planning using hybrid minimax reference point - DEA approach

The purpose of assessing past performances and setting future targets for an organisation such as a bank branch is to find where the branch stands in comparison to its peers within the bank branch network and how to improve the efficiency of its operations relatively when compared to the best practice branches. However, future performance targets may be set arbitrarily by the head-office and thus could be unrealistic and not achievable by a branch. A hybrid minimax reference point-data envelopment analysis (HMRP-DEA) approach is investigated to incorporate the value judgements of both branch managers and head-office directors and to search for the most preferred solution (MPS) along the efficient frontier for each bank branch. The HMRP-DEA approach is composed of three minimax models, including the super-ideal point model, the ideal point model and the shortest distance model, which share the same decision and objective spaces, are different from each other only in their reference points and weighting schema, and are proven to be equivalent to the output-oriented DEA dual models. These models are examined both analytically and graphically in this paper using a case study, which provides the unprecedented insight into integrated efficiency and trade-off analyses. The HMRP-DEA approach uses DEA as an ex-post-facto evaluation tool for past performance assessment and the minimax reference point approach as an ex-ante planning tool for future performance forecasting and target setting. Thus, the HMRP-DEA approach provides an alternative means for realistic target setting and better resource allocation. It is examined by a detailed investigation into the performance analysis for the fourteen branches of an international bank in the Greater Manchester area.

[1]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Estimating preferred target input−output levels using data envelopment analysis , 1992 .

[2]  A. U.S.,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 2003 .

[3]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Gradient projection and local region search for multiobjective optimisation , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Normal vector identification and interactive tradeoff analysis using minimax formulation in multiobjective optimization , 2002, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[5]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Rule and utility based evidential reasoning approach for multiattribute decision analysis under uncertainties , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[7]  Boaz Golany,et al.  An Interactive MOLP Procedure for the Extension of DEA to Effectiveness Analysis , 1988 .

[8]  A. Charnes,et al.  Polyhedral Cone-Ratio DEA Models with an illustrative application to large commercial banks , 1990 .

[9]  R. Dyson,et al.  Reducing Weight Flexibility in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1988 .

[10]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Origins, uses of, and relations between goal programming and data envelopment analysis , 2005 .

[11]  Tyrone T. Lin,et al.  Application of DEA in analyzing a bank's operating performance , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[12]  A. Soteriou,et al.  An internal customer service quality data envelopment analysis model for bank branches , 1997 .

[13]  A. Charnes,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis Theory, Methodology and Applications , 1995 .

[14]  Meryem Duygun Fethi,et al.  Assessing Bank Efficiency and Performance with Operational Research and Artificial Intelligence Techniques: A Survey , 2009 .

[15]  Tser-yieth Chen,et al.  A study of efficiency evaluation in Taiwan’s banks , 1998 .

[16]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  An Interactive MOLP Method Using the Gradient Projection Approach in Locating the Most Preferred Solution in DEA and Efficiency Analysis , 2004 .

[17]  John E. Beasley,et al.  Restricting Weight Flexibility in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1990 .

[18]  P. Andersen,et al.  A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis , 1993 .

[19]  Ralph E. Steuer,et al.  An interactive weighted Tchebycheff procedure for multiple objective programming , 1983, Math. Program..

[20]  W. Cook,et al.  Sales performance measurement in bank branches , 2001 .

[21]  Necmi K. Avkiran,et al.  An application reference for data envelopment analysis in branch banking: helping the novice researcher , 1999 .

[22]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Using interactive multiobjective methods to solve DEA problems with value judgements , 2009, Comput. Oper. Res..

[23]  M. Lightner,et al.  Multiple criterion optimization for the design of electronic circuits , 1981 .

[24]  A. Athanassopoulos Decision Support for Target-Based Resource Allocation of Public Services in Multiunit and Multilevel Systems , 1998 .

[25]  Russell G. Thompson,et al.  The role of multiplier bounds in efficiency analysis with application to Kansas farming , 1990 .

[26]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Minimax reference point approach and its application for multiobjective optimisation , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[27]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Integrating DEA-oriented performance assessment and target setting using interactive MOLP methods , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[28]  A. Athanassopoulos Goal programming & data envelopment analysis (GoDEA) for target-based multi-level planning: Allocating central grants to the Greek local authorities , 1995 .