Case study research methods for theory building

This article provides a new definition for case study research. Achieving deep understanding of processes and other concept variables (e.g. actors’ perceptions of their own thinking processes, intentions and contextual influences) is identified as the principal objective of case study research. Using multiple methods to “triangulate” (i.e. confirm and deepen understanding by using multiple sources all focusing on the same process/event) within the same case is described. The article outlines the core criticisms made by case study researchers of large sample surveys. A need exists for a paradigm shift in research on organizational behavior (including modeling the antecedents of new product performance). The article outlines the telling weaknesses of case study research as seen by other researchers. The article examines Senge’s core propositions related to the “mental models” of decision participants. Details illustrate the use of specific research methods for case studies to achieve different research objectives and the combination of objectives. Finally, the article illustrates basic concept variables in a case study and 12 propositions are reviewed briefly. This report reviews classic and recent contributions in the literature on case study research.

[1]  Roger I. Hall,et al.  A System Pathology of an Organization: The Rise and Fall of the Old Saturday Evening Post. , 1976 .

[2]  Merrie Brucks,et al.  Introspection in Consumer Research: Implementation and Implications , 1993 .

[3]  K. Weick,et al.  Unobtrusive Measures in Organizational Theory: A Reminder. , 1979 .

[4]  Arch G. Woodside.  Mapping how industry buys , 1992 .

[5]  Structural Role Analysis of Organizational Buying: A Preliminary Investigation , 1977 .

[6]  Grant Mccracken.  The long interview , 1988 .

[7]  Arch G. Woodside,et al.  Constructing thick descriptions of marketers’ and buyers’ decision processes in business‐to‐business relationships , 2000 .

[8]  H. Simon,et al.  Observation of a Business Decision , 1956 .

[9]  Melanie Wallendorf,et al.  Market-Oriented Ethnography: Interpretation Building and Marketing Strategy Formulation , 1994 .

[10]  W. Whyte,et al.  Participatory Action Research , 1989 .

[11]  J. Sandberg,et al.  The think aloud method , 1994 .

[12]  K. Weick.  The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[13]  E. Witte.  Field Research on Complex Decision-Making Processes – The Phase Theorem , 1972 .

[14]  James M. Hulbert,et al.  Organizational analysis and information-systems design: A decision-process perspective , 1975 .

[15]  G. C. Homans,et al.  Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. , 1975 .

[16]  M. J. Phillips.  Control of “Error” in Market Research Data , 1976 .

[17]  P. C. Nutt.  The Formulation Processes and Tactics Used in Organizational Decision Making , 1993 .

[18]  Glenn L. Christensen,et al.  Mapping consumers' mental models with ZMET , 2002 .

[19]  Gregg B. Jackson,et al.  Meta-Analysis: Cumulating Research Findings Across Studies , 1982 .

[20]  Danny Miller,et al.  Evolution And Revolution: A Quantum View Of Structural Change In Organizations , 1982 .

[21]  Christina H. Gladwin,et al.  Ethnographic Decision Tree Modeling , 1989 .

[22]  J. Bargh,et al.  Automaticity of social behavior: direct effects of trait construct and stereotype-activation on action. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  N. Denzin,et al.  The Research Act , 1978 .

[24]  W. Gibb Dyer,et al.  Better Stories, Not Better Constructs, To Generate Better Theory: A Rejoinder to Eisenhardt , 1991 .

[25]  J. V. Maanen,et al.  The Fact of Fiction in Organizational Ethnography. , 1979 .

[26]  James G. March,et al.  Crossroads---Organizational Performance as a Dependent Variable , 1997 .

[27]  P. R. Sanday.  The Ethnographic Paradigm(s). , 1979 .

[28]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  Dynamic Memory Revisited , 1999 .

[29]  D. Barlow,et al.  Single Case Experimental Designs: Strategies for Studying Behavior Change , 1976 .

[30]  M. Mead,et al.  A Theory of Public Bureaucracy: Politics, Personality, and Organization in the State Department. , 1977 .

[31]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[32]  John A. Bargh,et al.  Losing Consciousness: Automatic Influences on Consumer Judgment, Behavior, and Motivation , 2002 .

[33]  D. Campbell.  III. “Degrees of Freedom” and the Case Study , 1975 .

[34]  R. Hall.  The Natural Logic of Management Policy Making: Its Implications for the Survival of an Organization , 1984 .

[35]  Deborah D. Heisley,et al.  Autodriving: A Photoelicitation Technique , 1991 .

[36]  K. Weick.  FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[37]  John A. Howard,et al.  Information Processing Model of Executive Decision , 1968 .

[38]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Mapping Strategic Thought. , 1992 .

[39]  P. Senge.  THE FIFTH DISCIPLINE , 1997 .

[40]  A. Pettigrew.  Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice , 1990 .

[41]  C. Geertz,et al.  The Interpretation of Cultures , 1973 .