Pupillometry as a measure of cognitive effort in younger and older adults.

Two experiments examined the effectiveness of the pupillary response as a measure of cognitive load in younger and older adults. Experiment 1 measured the change in pupil size of younger and older adults while they listened to spoken digit lists that varied in length and retained them briefly for recall. In Experiment 2 changes in relative pupil size were measured while younger and older adults listened to sentences for later recall that varied in syntactic complexity and sentence length. Both age groups' pupil sizes were sensitive to the size of the memory set in Experiment 1 and sentence length in Experiment 2, with the older adults showing a larger effect of the memory load on a normalized measure of pupil size relative to the younger adults. By contrast, only the younger adults showed a difference in the pupillary response to a change in syntactic complexity, even with an adjustment for the reduced reactivity of the older pupil.

[1]  R. Hetherington.  The Shellen chart as a test of visual acuity , 1954, Psychologische Forschung.

[2]  R. N. Indah.  Language and Speech , 1958, Nature.

[3]  E. Hess,et al.  Pupil Size in Relation to Mental Activity during Simple Problem-Solving , 1964, Science.

[4]  D Kahneman,et al.  Pupil Diameter and Load on Memory , 1966, Science.

[5]  R. P. Carver.  Pupil dilation and its relationship to information processing during reading and listening. , 1971, The Journal of applied psychology.

[6]  D A Johnson,et al.  Pupillary responses during a short-term memory task: cognitive processing, arousal, or both? , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  W. S. Peavler,et al.  Pupil size, information overload, and performance differences. , 1974, Psychophysiology.

[8]  James S. Taylor.  Pupillary Response to Auditory versus Visual Mental Loading: A Pilot Study Using Super 8-Mm Photography , 1981, Perceptual and motor skills.

[9]  J. Beatty.  Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources. , 1982, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  J. Beatty.  Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources. , 1982 .

[11]  Y. Ben-nun.  The use of pupillometry in the study of on-line verbal processing: Evidence for depths of processing , 1986, Brain and Language.

[12]  S. Kemper.  Syntactic complexity and elderly adults' prose recall. , 1987, Experimental aging research.

[13]  M. Just,et al.  Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory , 1991 .

[14]  M. Just,et al.  From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 1992 A capacity theory of comprehension : Individual differences in working memory , 2017 .

[15]  M. Just,et al.  The intensity dimension of thought: pupillometric indices of sentence processing. , 1993, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[16]  D. Kausler.  Learning and memory in normal aging , 1994 .

[17]  L. Light,et al.  Comprehension and use of anaphoric devices in young and older adults , 1994 .

[18]  A. Wingfield,et al.  Age differences in veridical and reconstructive recall of syntactically and randomly segmented speech. , 1995, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[19]  J Hyönä,et al.  Pupil Dilation as a Measure of Processing Load in Simultaneous Interpretation and Other Language Tasks , 1995, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[20]  A Wingfield,et al.  The allocation of memory resources during sentence comprehension: Evidence from the elderly , 1995, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[21]  E. Granholm,et al.  Pupillary responses index cognitive resource limitations. , 1996, Psychophysiology.

[22]  M. Just,et al.  Brain Activation Modulated by Sentence Comprehension , 1996, Science.

[23]  J. Fozard,et al.  Age- and gender-specific reference ranges for hearing level and longitudinal changes in hearing level. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  M. Williams,et al.  Age and forgetfulness: confidence in ability and attribution for memory failures. , 1996, Psychology and aging.

[25]  J M Festen,et al.  Assessing aspects of auditory handicap by means of pupil dilatation. , 1997, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[26]  G. Waters,et al.  Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[27]  K. Heilman,et al.  Arousal response with aging: Pupillographic study , 2000, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[28]  J. Beatty,et al.  The pupillary system. , 2000 .

[29]  G. Waters,et al.  Age, working memory, and on-line syntactic processing in sentence comprehension. , 2001, Psychology and aging.

[30]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  Processing Difficulty and Principles of Grammar , 2002 .

[31]  J. Gee,et al.  Neural basis for sentence comprehension: Grammatical and short‐term memory components , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[32]  Michael J Kahana,et al.  The dynamics of memory retrieval in older adulthood. , 2002, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[33]  A. Wingfield,et al.  Speech Rate and Syntactic Complexity as Multiplicative Factors in Speech Comprehension by Young and Older Adults , 2003 .

[34]  Veikko Surakka,et al.  Pupil size variation as an indication of affective processing , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[35]  S. Colcombe,et al.  The impact of stereotype threat on age differences in memory performance. , 2003, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[36]  E. Granholm,et al.  Pupillary responses on the visual backward masking task reflect general cognitive ability. , 2004, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[37]  Murray Grossman,et al.  Dissociable patterns of brain activity during comprehension of rapid and syntactically complex speech: Evidence from fMRI , 2004, Brain and Language.

[38]  S. Steinhauer,et al.  Sympathetic and parasympathetic innervation of pupillary dilation during sustained processing. , 2004, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[39]  F. Paas,et al.  Memory load and the cognitive pupillary response in aging. , 2004, Psychophysiology.

[40]  A. Wingfield,et al.  Language and the aging brain: patterns of neural compensation revealed by functional brain imaging. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[41]  Arthur Wingfield,et al.  Spoken sentence processing in young and older adults modulated by task demands: evidence from self-paced listening. , 2006, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[42]  T. Troscianko,et al.  Effort during visual search and counting: Insights from pupillometry , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[43]  M. Bradley,et al.  The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and autonomic activation. , 2008, Psychophysiology.

[44]  Nicolas Rohleder,et al.  Determinants of salivary α-amylase in humans and methodological considerations , 2009, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[45]  M. Manosevitz.  High-Speed Scanning in Human Memory , .