Influence of conformity on the wear of total knee replacement: An experimental study

Wear of total knee replacement continues to be a significant factor influencing the clinical longevity of implants. Historically, failure due to delamination and fatigue directed design towards more conforming inserts to reduce contact stress. As new generations of more oxidatively stable polyethylene have been developed, more flexibility in bearing design has been introduced. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of insert conformity on the wear performance of a fixed bearing total knee replacement through experimental simulation. Two geometries of insert were studied under standard gait conditions. There was a significant reduction in wear with reducing implant conformity. This study has demonstrated that bearing conformity has a significant impact on the wear performance of a fixed bearing total knee replacement, providing opportunities to improve clinical performance through enhanced material and design selection.

[1]  Saverio Affatato,et al.  Displacement or Force Control Knee Simulators? Variations in Kinematics and in Wear. , 2016, Artificial organs.

[2]  P. Lachiewicz,et al.  Is There a Benefit to Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene in Posterior-stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Randomized Trial , 2016, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  J. Jauregui,et al.  Long-Term Survivorship and Clinical Outcomes Following Total Knee Arthroplasty. , 2015, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[4]  J. Currier,et al.  Comparison of Wear and Oxidation in Retrieved Conventional and Highly Cross-Linked UHMWPE Tibial Inserts. , 2015, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[5]  E. Swarts,et al.  Oxidation of Second Generation Sequentially Irradiated and Annealed Highly Cross-Linked X3™ Polyethylene Tibial Bearings. , 2015, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[6]  C. Clark,et al.  In Vivo Performance of Moderately Crosslinked, Thermally Treated Polyethylene in a Prospective Randomized Controlled Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Trial. , 2015, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[7]  O. Muratoglu,et al.  Lower prosthesis-specific 10-year revision rate with crosslinked than with non-crosslinked polyethylene in primary total knee arthroplasty , 2015, Acta orthopaedica.

[8]  Zhongmin Jin,et al.  Contribution of geometric design parameters to knee implant performance: Conflicting impact of conformity on kinematics and contact mechanics. , 2015, The Knee.

[9]  Yunhua Luo,et al.  In-vitro and in-silico investigations on the influence of contact pressure on cross-linked polyethylene wear in total knee replacements , 2015 .

[10]  C. Hurschler,et al.  In vitro kinematics of fixed versus mobile bearing in unicondylar knee arthroplasty , 2015, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[11]  J. Currier,et al.  Does Increased Topside Conformity in Modular Total Knee Arthroplasty Lead to Increased Backside Wear? , 2015, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  Young-Hoo Kim,et al.  Long-term clinical outcomes and survivorship of press-fit condylar sigma fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee prostheses in the same patients. , 2014, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[13]  L. Costa,et al.  Correlation between in vivo stresses and oxidation of UHMWPE in total hip arthroplasty , 2014, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine.

[14]  M. Teeter,et al.  Fracture of Two Moderately Cross-Linked Polyethylene Tibial Inserts in a TKR Patient , 2014, Case reports in orthopedics.

[15]  Zhongmin Jin,et al.  The effect of insert conformity and material on total knee replacement wear , 2013, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[16]  D. Dalury,et al.  Why are total knee arthroplasties being revised? , 2013, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[17]  M. Wimmer,et al.  Osteolysis around total knee arthroplasty: a review of pathogenetic mechanisms. , 2013, Acta biomaterialia.

[18]  D. Saragaglia,et al.  Survival analysis of total knee arthroplasty at a minimum 10 years' follow-up: a multicenter French nationwide study including 846 cases. , 2013, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.

[19]  Matthew W. Kury,et al.  Clinical trade-offs in cross-linked ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene used in total joint arthroplasty. , 2013, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[20]  Clare K Fitzpatrick,et al.  Relative contributions of design, alignment, and loading variability in knee replacement mechanics , 2012, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[21]  John Fisher,et al.  Wear of moderately cross-linked polyethylene in fixed-bearing total knee replacements , 2012, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[22]  J. Galante,et al.  Surface Damage Versus Tibial Polyethylene Insert Conformity: A Retrieval Study , 2012, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[23]  J. Wertz Total Knee Replacements , 2011 .

[24]  L. Pruitt,et al.  Tradeoffs amongst fatigue, wear, and oxidation resistance of cross-linked ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. , 2011, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[25]  J. Fisher,et al.  The wear of fixed and mobile bearing unicompartmental knee replacements , 2011, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[26]  T. Johnson,et al.  Highly crosslinked polyethylene in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty: in vitro performance evaluation of wear, delamination, and tibial post durability. , 2011, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[27]  D. Bruce,et al.  Reduction of Total Knee Replacement Wear with Vitamin E Blended Highly Cross-Linked Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene , 2011, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[28]  Zhongmin Jin,et al.  Effect of conformity and contact stress on wear in fixed-bearing total knee prostheses. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  V. Jansson,et al.  Wear of contemporary total knee replacements--a knee simulator study of six current designs. , 2009, Clinical biomechanics.

[30]  T. Schwenke,et al.  Differences in wear between load and displacement control tested total knee replacements , 2009 .

[31]  J. Fisher,et al.  The influence of tibial tray design on the wear of fixed-bearing total knee replacements , 2008, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[32]  J Fisher,et al.  Wear simulation of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene hip implants by incorporating the effects of cross-shear and contact pressure , 2008, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[33]  I. Clarke,et al.  Dose effects of cross-linking polyethylene for total knee arthroplasty on wear performance and mechanical properties. , 2007, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[34]  S. Kurtz,et al.  Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[35]  V. Saikko,et al.  Effect of contact pressure on wear and friction of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene in multidirectional sliding , 2006, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[36]  O. Muratoglu,et al.  Mechanisms of decrease in fatigue crack propagation resistance in irradiated and melted UHMWPE. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[37]  C. J. Bell,et al.  The influence of design, materials and kinematics on the in vitro wear of total knee replacements. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[38]  J. Fisher,et al.  Wear, Debris, and Biologic Activity of Cross-linked Polyethylene in the Knee: Benefits and Potential Concerns , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[39]  A Unsworth,et al.  Is the wear factor in total joint replacements dependent on the nominal contact stress in ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene contacts? , 2004, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[40]  R. Wasielewski The causes of insert backside wear in total knee arthroplasty. , 2002, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[41]  J. Fisher,et al.  Comparison of wear in a total knee replacement under different kinematic conditions , 2001, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[42]  A. Edidin,et al.  Advances in the processing, sterilization, and crosslinking of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene for total joint arthroplasty. , 1999, Biomaterials.

[43]  P. Walker,et al.  The conflicting requirements of laxity and conformity in total knee replacement. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[44]  M. Mayor,et al.  The Impact of Sterilization Method on Wear in Knee Arthroplasty , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[45]  P R Cavanagh,et al.  Three-dimensional kinematics of the human knee during walking. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[46]  T. Wright,et al.  Wear of polyethylene in total joint replacements. Observations from retrieved PCA knee implants. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.