Putting concepts into context

At first glance, conceptual representations (e.g., our internal notion of the object “lemon”) seem static; we have the impression that there is something that the concept lemon “means” (a sour, yellow, football-shaped citrus fruit) and that this meaning does not vary. Research in semantic memory has traditionally taken this “static” perspective. Consequently, only effects demonstrated across a variety of contexts have typically been considered informative regarding the architecture of the semantic system. In this review, we take the opposite approach: We review instances of context-dependent conceptual activation at many different timescales—from long-term experience, to recent experience, to the current task goals, to the unfolding process of conceptual activation itself—and suggest that the pervasive effects of context across all of these timescales indicate that rather than being static, conceptual representations are constantly changing and are inextricably linked to their contexts.

[1]  R. Schvaneveldt,et al.  Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  J. Bransford,et al.  Comprehension and semantic flexibility , 1974 .

[3]  Roger M. Cooper,et al.  The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language: A new methodology for the real-time investigation of speech perception, memory, and language processing. , 1974 .

[4]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and cognitive control. , 1975 .

[5]  Alan S. Brown,et al.  Information Processing and Cognition: The Loyola Symposium , 1976 .

[6]  D. Swinney Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects , 1979 .

[7]  M. McCloskey,et al.  Decision processes in verifying category membership statements: Implications for models of semantic memory , 1979, Cognitive Psychology.

[8]  Robert Schreuder,et al.  Effects of perceptual and conceptual similarity in semantic priming , 1984 .

[9]  R. Schreuder,et al.  Semantic activation during recognition of referential words , 1985 .

[10]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition : Psychological and Biological Models , 1986 .

[11]  Lawrence W. Barsalou,et al.  The instability of graded structure: implications for the nature of concepts , 1987 .

[12]  P. Tabossi Effects of context on the immediate interpretation of unambiguous nouns. , 1988 .

[13]  Phillip J. Moore,et al.  Verbal and visual learning styles , 1988 .

[14]  Antonio R. Damasio,et al.  The Brain Binds Entities and Events by Multiregional Activation from Convergence Zones , 1989, Neural Computation.

[15]  Jeffrey L. Elman,et al.  Finding Structure in Time , 1990, Cogn. Sci..

[16]  Barbara C. Malt,et al.  Do artifact concepts have cores , 1992 .

[17]  J. Elman Learning and development in neural networks: the importance of starting small , 1993, Cognition.

[18]  D. Schacter Memory distortion: History and current status , 1995 .

[19]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Subject Terms: Linguistics Language Eyes & eyesight Cognition & reasoning , 1995 .

[20]  Gerry T. M. Altmann,et al.  The Ascent of Babel: An Exploration of Language, Mind, and Understanding , 1997 .

[21]  Lorraine K. Tyler,et al.  The Time Course of Activation of Semantic Information during Spoken Word Recognition , 1997 .

[22]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[23]  M. Raijmakers Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. , 1997 .

[24]  J. Raaijmakers,et al.  Does pizza prime coin? Perceptual priming in lexical decision and pronunciation. , 1998 .

[25]  C. Price,et al.  Functional Neuroanatomy of the Semantic System: Divisible by What? , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[26]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Ways of featuring in object categorization , 1998, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[27]  R. Ellis,et al.  On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  The development of features in object concepts , 1998, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[29]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Whither structured representation? , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[30]  F. Pulvermüller,et al.  Words in the brain's language , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[31]  M. Farah,et al.  A neural basis for category and modality specificity of semantic knowledge , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  M. Tarr,et al.  Activation of the middle fusiform 'face area' increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[33]  C. Frith,et al.  The role of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in the selection of action as revealed by functional imaging , 2000 .

[34]  Guido Gainotti,et al.  What the Locus of Brain Lesion Tells us About the Nature of the Cognitive Defect Underlying Category-Specific Disorders: A Review , 2000, Cortex.

[35]  E. Miller,et al.  An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[36]  L. Tyler,et al.  Towards a distributed account of conceptual knowledge , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[37]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Hierarchies, similarity, and interactivity in object recognition: “Category-specific” neuropsychological deficits , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[38]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Language Comprehenders Mentally Represent the Shapes of Objects , 2002, Psychological science.

[39]  H. Chertkow,et al.  Semantic memory , 2002, Current neurology and neuroscience reports.

[40]  Uta Noppeney,et al.  Can segregation within the semantic system account for category-specific deficits? , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[41]  Michael J. Spivey,et al.  The Continuity Of Mind , 2008 .

[42]  S. Thompson-Schill Neuroimaging studies of semantic memory: inferring “how” from “where” , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[43]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Structure and deterioration of semantic memory: a neuropsychological and computational investigation. , 2004, Psychological review.

[44]  M. Garrett,et al.  Representing the meanings of object and action words: The featural and unitary semantic space hypothesis , 2004, Cognitive Psychology.

[45]  J. Elman An alternative view of the mental lexicon , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[46]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Where bottom-up meets top-down: neuronal interactions during perception and imagery. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[47]  Mark S. Gilzenrat,et al.  A Systems-Level Perspective on Attention and Cognitive Control: Guided Activation, Adaptive Gating, Conflict Monitoring, and Exploitation versus Exploration. , 2004 .

[48]  Irene P. Kan,et al.  Effect of name agreement on prefrontal activity during overt and covert picture naming , 2004, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[49]  Irene P. Kan,et al.  Selection from perceptual and conceptual representations , 2004, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[50]  J. Prinz Furnishing the Mind: Concepts and Their Perceptual Basis , 2004 .

[51]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Semantic Cognition: A Parallel Distributed Processing Approach , 2004 .

[52]  Cathy J. Price,et al.  Fusiform Activation to Animals is Driven by the Process, Not the Stimulus , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[53]  S. Thompson-Schill,et al.  The frontal lobes and the regulation of mental activity , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[54]  Amanda Van Scoyoc,et al.  Fractionating the Left Frontal Response to Tools: Dissociable Effects of Motor Experience and Lexical Competition , 2006 .

[55]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Two distinct neural mechanisms for category-selective responses. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[56]  Olaf Hauk,et al.  Experience-dependent Plasticity of Conceptual Representations in Human Sensory-Motor Areas , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[57]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  What is the role of motor simulation in action and object recognition? Evidence from apraxia , 2007, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[58]  T. Rogers,et al.  Where do you know what you know? The representation of semantic knowledge in the human brain , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[59]  Alex Martin,et al.  A neural system for learning about object function. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[60]  T. Rogers,et al.  Object categorization: reversals and explanations of the basic-level advantage. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[61]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content , 2008, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[62]  Sian L. Beilock,et al.  Sports experience changes the neural processing of action language , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[63]  Lawrence W. Barsalou,et al.  Perceptual Processing Affects Conceptual Processing , 2008, Cogn. Sci..

[64]  Markus Kiefer,et al.  Conceptual Flexibility in the Human Brain: Dynamic Recruitment of Semantic Maps from Visual, Motor, and Motion-related Areas , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[65]  Nicolas Vermeulen,et al.  Sensory load incurs conceptual processing costs , 2008, Cognition.

[66]  J. Elman On the Meaning of Words and Dinosaur Bones: Lexical Knowledge Without a Lexicon , 2009, Cogn. Sci..

[67]  Sharon L Thompson-Schill,et al.  The Neural Correlates of Visual and Verbal Cognitive Styles , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[68]  Robyn T. Oliver,et al.  Remembrance of things touched: How sensorimotor experience affects the neural instantiation of object form , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[69]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Action in cognition: The case of language , 2009, Language and Cognition.

[70]  Michael J. Spivey,et al.  The enactment of language: Decades of interactions between linguistic and motor processes , 2009, Language and Cognition.

[71]  Sean M. Polyn,et al.  Task context and organization in free recall , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[72]  Roel M. Willems,et al.  Body-specific representations of action verbs: Neural evidence from right- and left-handers , 2009, NeuroImage.

[73]  M. L. Lambon Ralph,et al.  Category-Specific versus Category-General Semantic Impairment Induced by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2010, Current Biology.

[74]  Harold Bekkering,et al.  Context Effects in Embodied Lexical-Semantic Processing , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[75]  A. Chatterjee Disembodying cognition , 2010, Language and Cognition.

[76]  M. Kiefer,et al.  Attentional sensitization of unconscious cognition: task sets modulate subsequent masked semantic priming. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[77]  Elizabeth Jefferies,et al.  tegory-General Semantic Impairment Induced by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2010 .

[78]  Sally A. Linkenauger,et al.  A Functional Role for Motor Simulation in Identifying Tools , 2010, Psychological science.

[79]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Impaired access to manipulation features in Apraxia: Evidence from eyetracking and semantic judgment tasks , 2010, Brain and Language.

[80]  Daniel N. Bub,et al.  On the nature of hand-action representations evoked during written sentence comprehension , 2010, Cognition.

[81]  Robert Davies,et al.  Neural Correlates of Abstract Verb Processing , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[82]  Daniel Casasanto,et al.  Flexibility in Embodied Language Understanding , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[83]  Rutvik H. Desai,et al.  The neurobiology of semantic memory , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[84]  Sharon L. Thompson-Schill,et al.  Color, Context, and Cognitive Style: Variations in Color Knowledge Retrieval as a Function of Task and Subject Variables , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[85]  Christian Frings,et al.  How to switch on and switch off semantic priming effects for natural and artifactual categories: activation processes in category memory depend on focusing specific feature dimensions , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[86]  Markus Kiefer,et al.  Neuroplasticity of semantic representations for musical instruments in professional musicians , 2011, NeuroImage.

[87]  D. Bub,et al.  Priming of reach and grasp actions by handled objects. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[88]  M. Kiefer,et al.  Controlling the Unconscious , 2011, Psychological science.

[89]  S. Thompson-Schill,et al.  Function follows form: activation of shape and function features during object identification. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[90]  Iain D. Gilchrist,et al.  Testing a Simplified Method for Measuring Velocity Integration in Saccades Using a Manipulation of Target Contrast , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[91]  Roel M. Willems,et al.  Embodied Cognition: Taking the Next Step , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[92]  S. Thompson-Schill,et al.  The evocative power of words: activation of concepts by verbal and nonverbal means. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[93]  D. Bub,et al.  On the dynamics of action representations evoked by names of manipulable objects. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[94]  M. Kiefer,et al.  Conceptual representations in mind and brain: Theoretical developments, current evidence and future directions , 2012, Cortex.

[95]  F. Cuetos,et al.  The effect of motion content in action naming by Parkinson’s disease patients , 2012, Cortex.

[96]  D. Mirman,et al.  Temporal dynamics of activation of thematic and functional knowledge during conceptual processing of manipulable artifacts. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[97]  Sharon L. Thompson-Schill,et al.  The Cognitive Neuroscience of Semantic Memory , 2012 .

[98]  Frank E Garcea,et al.  What is in a tool concept? Dissociating manipulation knowledge from function knowledge , 2012, Memory & Cognition.

[99]  Eiling Yee,et al.  Colorless Green Ideas (Can) Prime Furiously , 2012, Psychological science.

[100]  Gary Lupyan,et al.  Categorization is modulated by transcranial direct current stimulation over left prefrontal cortex , 2012, Cognition.

[101]  Harold Bekkering,et al.  Flexibility in embodied lexical‐semantic representations , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[102]  Louise Connell,et al.  When does perception facilitate or interfere with conceptual processing? The effect of attentional modulation , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[103]  S. Thompson-Schill,et al.  Manual Experience Shapes Object Representations , 2013, Psychological science.

[104]  M. Bikson,et al.  Noninvasive transcranial direct current stimulation over the left prefrontal cortex facilitates cognitive flexibility in tool use , 2013, Cognitive neuroscience.

[105]  Natalie M. Trumpp,et al.  Losing the sound of concepts: Damage to auditory association cortex impairs the processing of sound-related concepts , 2013, Cortex.

[106]  O. Hauk,et al.  The Body of Evidence: What Can Neuroscience Tell Us about Embodied Semantics? , 2013, Front. Psychology.

[107]  D. Mirman,et al.  Linking language and categorization: Evidence from aphasia , 2013, Cortex.

[108]  D. Mirman,et al.  Incidental and context-responsive activation of structure- and function-based action features during object identification. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[109]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  The Oxford handbook of cognitive neuroscience , 2013 .

[110]  Rebecca J Woods,et al.  Experience with malleable objects influences shape-based object individuation by infants. , 2014, Infant behavior & development.

[111]  D. Mirman,et al.  Abnormal dynamics of activation of object use information in apraxia: Evidence from eyetracking , 2014, Neuropsychologia.

[112]  Louise Connell,et al.  I see/hear what you mean: semantic activation in visual word recognition depends on perceptual attention. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[113]  Dermot Lynott,et al.  Principles of Representation: Why You Can't Represent the Same Concept Twice , 2014, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[114]  L. Buxbaum,et al.  Visual context modulates potentiation of grasp types during semantic object categorization , 2013, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[115]  Daniel Casasanto,et al.  ONLY Margolis — The Conceptual Mind El 19 All Concepts Are Ad Hoc Concepts , 2014 .

[116]  Shawn C. Milleville,et al.  Object identification leads to a conceptual broadening of object representations in lateral prefrontal cortex , 2015, Neuropsychologia.

[117]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  What is embodied about cognition? , 2015, Language, cognition and neuroscience.

[118]  Sharon L. Thompson-Schill,et al.  Semantic variability predicts neural variability of object concepts , 2015, Neuropsychologia.

[119]  Lawrence W. Barsalou,et al.  Are Automatic Conceptual Cores the Gold Standard of Semantic Processing? The Context-Dependence of Spatial Meaning in Grounded Congruency Effects , 2015, Cogn. Sci..

[120]  Sophie-Carolin Wagner,et al.  The Neural System , 2016 .

[121]  Guy Dove Three symbol ungrounding problems: Abstract concepts and the future of embodied cognition , 2016, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[122]  Sandra R. Waxman,et al.  Linking language and categorization in infancy* , 2016, Journal of Child Language.