Safe magnetic resonance image scanning of the pacemaker patient: current technologies and future directions.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the imaging modality of choice in many clinical situations, and its use is likely to grow due to expanding indications and an ageing population. Many patients with implantable devices are denied MRI except in cases of urgent need, and when scans must be performed they are complicated by the need for burdensome and costly personnel and monitoring requirements that have the net effect of restricting access to scans. Several small studies, enrolling a total of 344 patients, suggest that some patients with conventional systems may undergo MR examinations without clinically overt adverse events. However, a number of potential interactions exist between implantable cardiac devices and the static and gradient magnetic fields and modulated radio frequency (RF) fields generated during MR scans; nearly all studies have reported pacing capture threshold changes, troponin elevations, ectopy, unpredictable reed switch behaviour, and other 'subclinical' issues with pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) in patients who have undergone MRI. Attention has turned to devices that are specifically designed to be safe in the MRI environment. A clinical study of one such device documented its ability to be exposed to MRI in a 1.5 T scanner without adverse impact on patient outcomes or pacemaker system function. Such new technologies may enable scanning of pacemaker and ICD patients with reduced concerns regarding the short- and long-term effects of MRI. As importantly, these devices may increase the number of centres that are able to safely perform MRI and, thus, expand access to scans for patients with these devices.

[1]  J. Gimbel The safety of MRI scanning of pacemakers and ICDs: what are the critical elements of safe scanning? Ask me again at 10,000. , 2010, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[2]  Emanuel Kanal,et al.  Outcome of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Selected Patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (ICDs) , 2005, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[3]  D. Bluemke,et al.  Safety of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Cardiovascular Devices: An American Heart Association Scientific Statement From the Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention , 2007, Circulation.

[4]  MICHAEL MOLLERUS,et al.  Ectopy in Patients with Permanent Pacemakers and Implantable Cardioverter‐Defibrillators Undergoing an MRI Scan , 2009, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[5]  Saman Nazarian,et al.  How to perform magnetic resonance imaging on patients with implantable cardiac arrhythmia devices. , 2009, Heart rhythm.

[6]  F. Romeo,et al.  Safety and efficacy of a new magnetic resonance imaging-compatible pacing system: early results of a prospective comparison with conventional dual-chamber implant outcomes. , 2010, Heart rhythm.

[7]  S. Priori,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging in individuals with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices. , 2008, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[8]  H. Halperin,et al.  Clinical Utility and Safety of a Protocol for Noncardiac and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Patients With Permanent Pacemakers and Implantable-Cardioverter Defibrillators at 1.5 Tesla , 2006, Circulation.

[9]  Harold Litt,et al.  Strategy for Safe Performance of Extrathoracic Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 1.5 Tesla in the Presence of Cardiac Pacemakers in Non–Pacemaker-Dependent Patients: A Prospective Study With 115 Examinations , 2006, Circulation.

[10]  Peter Hunold,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with a pacemaker system designed for the magnetic resonance environment. , 2011, Heart rhythm.

[11]  Robert Fair,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging and cardiac pacemaker safety at 1.5-Tesla. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  P Boesiger,et al.  Force and Torque Effects of a 1.5‐Tesla MRI Scanner on Cardiac Pacemakers and ICDs , 2001, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[13]  Peter Boesiger,et al.  In vivo heating of pacemaker leads during magnetic resonance imaging. , 2005, European heart journal.

[14]  P. Boesiger,et al.  Pacemaker Reed Switch Behavior in 0.5, 1.5, and 3.0 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging Units: Are Reed Switches Always Closed in Strong Magnetic Fields? , 2002, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[15]  Ron Kalin,et al.  Current Clinical Issues for MRI Scanning of Pacemaker and Defibrillator Patients , 2005, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[16]  E. Kanal,et al.  Safety of magnetic resonance imaging of patients with a new Medtronic EnRhythm MRI SureScan pacing system: clinical study design , 2008, Trials.

[17]  B L Wilkoff,et al.  Safe Performance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Five Patients with Permanent Cardiac Pacemakers , 1996, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[18]  B Lüderitz,et al.  Interference with Cardiac Pacemakers by Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Are There Irreversible Changes at 0.5 Tesla? , 2001, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[19]  K Bachmann,et al.  Effects of magnetic resonance imaging on cardiac pacemakers and electrodes. , 1997, American heart journal.

[20]  J Leal Del Ojo,et al.  Is Magnetic Resonance Imaging Safe in Cardiac Pacemaker Recipients? , 2005, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[21]  O. Faris,et al.  Food and Drug Administration perspective: Magnetic resonance imaging of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients. , 2006, Circulation.

[22]  J Gieseke,et al.  MR imaging and cardiac pacemakers: in-vitro evaluation and in-vivo studies in 51 patients at 0.5 T. , 2000, Radiology.