Understanding quantified-selfers' practices in collecting and exploring personal data

Researchers have studied how people use self-tracking technologies and discovered a long list of barriers including lack of time and motivation as well as difficulty in data integration and interpretation. Despite the barriers, an increasing number of Quantified-Selfers diligently track many kinds of data about themselves, and some of them share their best practices and mistakes through Meetup talks, blogging, and conferences. In this work, we aim to gain insights from these "extreme users," who have used existing technologies and built their own workarounds to overcome different barriers. We conducted a qualitative and quantitative analysis of 52 video recordings of Quantified Self Meetup talks to understand what they did, how they did it, and what they learned. We highlight several common pitfalls to self-tracking, including tracking too many things, not tracking triggers and context, and insufficient scientific rigor. We identify future research efforts that could help make progress toward addressing these pitfalls. We also discuss how our findings can have broad implications in designing and developing self-tracking technologies.

[1]  Konrad Tollmar,et al.  Health Mashups: Presenting Statistical Patterns between Wellbeing Data and Context in Natural Language to Promote Behavior Change , 2013, TCHI.

[2]  Karen Holtzblatt,et al.  Contextual design , 1997, INTR.

[3]  Jeffrey Heer,et al.  Wrangler: interactive visual specification of data transformation scripts , 2011, CHI.

[4]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  A stage-based model of personal informatics systems , 2010, CHI.

[5]  R. Nelson-Gray,et al.  An overview of self-monitoring research in assessment and treatment. , 1999 .

[6]  Alan E. Kazdin,et al.  Single-Case Research Designs: Methods for Clinical and Applied Settings , 2010 .

[7]  Syed Monowar Hossain,et al.  mPuff: Automated detection of cigarette smoking puffs from respiration measurements , 2012, 2012 ACM/IEEE 11th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN).

[8]  David W. McDonald,et al.  Activity sensing in the wild: a field trial of ubifit garden , 2008, CHI.

[9]  Sunny Consolvo,et al.  Lullaby: a capture & access system for understanding the sleep environment , 2012, UbiComp.

[10]  J. Titchener Experimenter Effects in Behavioral Research. , 1967 .

[11]  M. Swan Emerging Patient-Driven Health Care Models: An Examination of Health Social Networks, Consumer Personalized Medicine and Quantified Self-Tracking , 2009, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[12]  Emily Troshynski,et al.  Accountabilities of presence: reframing location-based systems , 2008, CHI.

[13]  Lena Mamykina,et al.  MAHI: investigation of social scaffolding for reflective thinking in diabetes management , 2008, CHI.

[14]  Silvia Lindtner,et al.  Fish'n'Steps: Encouraging Physical Activity with an Interactive Computer Game , 2006, UbiComp.

[15]  Margaret E. Morris,et al.  Mobile Heart Health: Project Highlight , 2009, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[16]  J. Kopp,et al.  Self-monitoring: A literature review of research and practice , 1988 .

[17]  Wanda Pratt,et al.  Probing the benefits of real-time tracking during cancer care , 2012, AMIA.

[18]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  Understanding my data, myself: supporting self-reflection with ubicomp technologies , 2011, UbiComp '11.

[19]  Wanda Pratt,et al.  Healthcare in the pocket: Mapping the space of mobile-phone health interventions , 2012, J. Biomed. Informatics.