A System Dynamic Model for Implementation of Industry 4.0

With advances in information and telecommunication technologies and data-enabled decision making, smart manufacturing can be an essential component of sustainable development. In this era, the promising relevant opportunities to reduce costs to boost productivity and improve quality is based on the integration or combination of simulated replicas of actual equipment, Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) and regionalized or decentralized decision making into a smart factory. However, this integration also presents the industry with different unique challenges. The stream of the data from sensors, robots, and CPS can aid to make the manufacturing smart. Therefore, it would be an increased need for modeling, optimization, and simulation to the value delivery of manufacturing data. This paper aims to outline the approach that was used to develop a system dynamics model to evaluate a superior design of “Industry 4.0” implementation for smart manufacturing.

[1]  Hans-Georg Kemper,et al.  Application-Pull and Technology-Push as Driving Forces for the Fourth Industrial Revolution , 2014 .

[2]  Alexandre Megretski,et al.  NSF Workshop in Cyber-Physical Systems , 2006 .

[3]  Thomas Hess,et al.  Internet of Services , 2009, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[4]  Yang Chao,et al.  System Dynamics Model of Shanghai Passenger Transportation Structure Evolution , 2013 .

[5]  Douglas H. Norrie,et al.  Agent-Based Systems for Intelligent Manufacturing: A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1999, Knowledge and Information Systems.

[6]  Kagermann Henning Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0 , 2013 .

[7]  Yang Lu,et al.  Industry 4.0: A survey on technologies, applications and open research issues , 2017, J. Ind. Inf. Integr..

[8]  Xinyu Yang,et al.  A Survey on Internet of Things: Architecture, Enabling Technologies, Security and Privacy, and Applications , 2017, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[9]  Siddhartha Kumar Khaitan,et al.  Design Techniques and Applications of Cyberphysical Systems: A Survey , 2015, IEEE Systems Journal.

[10]  T. Pereira,et al.  Industry 4.0 implications in logistics: an overview , 2017 .

[11]  Alasdair Gilchrist Industry 4.0: The Industrial Internet of Things , 2016 .

[12]  Benny Tjahjono,et al.  What does Industry 4.0 mean to Supply Chain , 2017 .

[13]  Jin Wang,et al.  A system dynamics approach for enhancing social behaviours regarding the reuse of packaging , 2016, Expert Syst. Appl..

[14]  Andre Bester,et al.  Industrial engineering curriculum in industry 4.0 in a South African context , 2016 .

[15]  Edward A. Lee Cyber Physical Systems: Design Challenges , 2008, 2008 11th IEEE International Symposium on Object and Component-Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing (ISORC).

[16]  K. Schwab The Fourth Industrial Revolution , 2013 .

[17]  Daqiang Zhang,et al.  Towards smart factory for industry 4.0: a self-organized multi-agent system with big data based feedback and coordination , 2016, Comput. Networks.

[18]  Mathias Schmitt,et al.  Mensch-Maschine-Interaktion im Industrie 4.0-Zeitalter , 2017, Handbuch Industrie 4.0.

[19]  TU MarioHermann Design Principles for Industrie 4 . 0 Scenarios , 2015 .

[20]  Birgit Vogel-Heuser,et al.  Guest Editorial Industry 4.0-Prerequisites and Visions , 2016, IEEE Trans Autom. Sci. Eng..

[21]  Michael Möhring,et al.  Industry 4.0 - Potentials for Creating Smart Products: Empirical Research Results , 2015, BIS.

[22]  J. Forrester Industrial Dynamics , 1997 .

[23]  Christoph Schroth,et al.  Web 2.0 and SOA: Converging Concepts Enabling the Internet of Services , 2007, IT Professional.

[24]  Antonio Iera,et al.  The Internet of Things: A survey , 2010, Comput. Networks.

[25]  Paul Rook,et al.  Controlling software projects , 1986, Softw. Eng. J..