Proposal of indicators regarding the provision and accessibility of green spaces for assessing the ecosystem service “recreation in the city” in Germany

ABSTRACT The paper summarises the multiple benefits of urban green spaces for city dwellers and provides an overview of proximity approaches and common key parameters for green-space quantification in cities. We propose indicators for the assessment of the ecosystem service ‘recreation in the city’ on a national scale. The calculation procedure, which takes into account the best available data sets in Germany, is explained. The determination of threshold values regarding green-space standards comprising type, size and distance is crucial to such studies. The results, the degree of provision with public green spaces in all German cities with more than 50,000 inhabitants (n = 182) and their accessibility, are presented. In total, green spaces are accessible for daily recreation for 74.3% of the inhabitants in German cities, which means that underprovision affects 8.1 million city dwellers. Some indicator details are shown for the examples of Wiesbaden and Stuttgart. Finally, we discuss the approach and values of the proposed and quantified indicators in a German and European context. EDITED BY Christine Fürst

[1]  D. Haase,et al.  Green justice or just green? Provision of urban green spaces in Berlin, Germany , 2014 .

[2]  Dave Kendal,et al.  Multiple ecosystem services and disservices of the urban forest establishing their connections with landscape structure and sociodemographics , 2014 .

[3]  A. Comber,et al.  Using a GIS-based network analysis to determine urban greenspace accessibility for different ethnic and religious groups , 2008 .

[4]  Gotthard Meinel,et al.  Measuring Land Take: Usability of National Topographic Databases as Input for Land Use Change Analysis: A Case Study from Germany , 2016, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[5]  Urban Europe , 2016 .

[6]  G. Kuchelmeister.  Urban forestry in the Asia-Pacific Region: status and prospects , 1998 .

[7]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  The scaling of green space coverage in European cities , 2009, Biology Letters.

[8]  Stephan Pauleit,et al.  Benefits and uses of urban forests and trees , 2005 .

[9]  Thomas Elmqvist,et al.  Benefits of restoring ecosystem services in urban areas , 2015 .

[10]  C. V. D. Bosch,et al.  Challenges and strategies for urban green-space planning in cities undergoing densification: A review , 2015 .

[11]  F. Dosch,et al.  Grün in der Stadt - für eine lebenswerte Zukunft : Grünbuch Stadtgrün , 2015 .

[12]  M. Artmann,et al.  Development of a Concept for Non-monetary Assessment of Urban Ecosystem Services at the Site Level , 2014, AMBIO.

[13]  Nina Schwarz,et al.  Synergies, Trade-offs, and Losses of Ecosystem Services in Urban Regions: an Integrated Multiscale Framework Applied to the Leipzig-Halle Region, Germany , 2012 .

[14]  O. Bastian,et al.  Ecosystem properties, potentials and services – The EPPS conceptual framework and an urban application example , 2012 .

[15]  Toke Emil Panduro,et al.  Classification and valuation of urban green spaces—A hedonic house price valuation , 2013 .

[16]  Iris Lehmann,et al.  Auswirkungen städtischer Nutzungsstrukturen auf Grünflächen und Grünvolumen , 2005 .

[17]  A. Polat,et al.  Relationships between the visual preferences of urban recreation area users and various landscape design elements , 2015 .

[18]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Understanding Urban Green Space as a Health Resource: A Qualitative Comparison of Visit Motivation and Derived Effects among Park Users in Sheffield, UK , 2013, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[19]  Salman Qureshi,et al.  Human–environment interactions in urban green spaces — A systematic review of contemporary issues and prospects for future research , 2015 .

[20]  Christian Krekel,et al.  The Greener, the Happier? The Effects of Urban Green and Abandoned Areas on Residential Well-Being , 2015 .

[21]  Greg Brown,et al.  Using participatory GIS to measure physical activity and urban park benefits , 2014 .

[22]  A. Plasència,et al.  Residential green spaces and mortality: A systematic review. , 2016, Environment international.

[23]  Adrienne Grêt-Regamey,et al.  Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services : Indicators for ecosystem assessments under Action 5 of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 , 2014 .

[24]  T. Gärling,et al.  Selective attention and heart rate responses to natural and urban environments. , 2003 .

[25]  H. Jordan,et al.  Value of urban green spaces in promoting healthy living and wellbeing: prospects for planning , 2015, Risk management and healthcare policy.

[26]  Jakub Kronenberg,et al.  Urban green space availability in European cities , 2016 .

[27]  P. Groenewegen,et al.  EVIDENCE BASED PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY AND PRACTICE Green space, urbanity, and health: how strong is the relation? , 2006 .

[28]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  The Health Benefits of Urban Nature: How Much Do We Need? , 2015 .

[29]  I. Zurlytė,et al.  Development of an urban green space indicator and the public health rationale , 2016, Scandinavian journal of public health.

[30]  M. Scopelliti,et al.  Go greener, feel better? The positive effects of biodiversity on the well-being of individuals visiting urban and peri-urban green areas , 2015 .

[31]  Karsten Grunewald,et al.  Analyse von Wegedistanzen in Städten zur Verifizierung des Ökosystemleistungsindikators "Erreichbarkeit städtischer Grünflächen" , 2016, AGIT Journal Angew. Geoinformatik.

[32]  Oluibukun Gbenga Ajayi,et al.  Using a GIS-Based Network Analysis to Determine Urban Greenspace Accessibility for Different Socio-Economic Groups, Specifically Related to Deprivation in Leicester, UK , 2014 .

[33]  A. Herzele,et al.  A monitoring tool for the provision of accessible and attractive urban green spaces , 2003 .

[34]  Gouldson.  EUROPE'S ENVIRONMENT: THE DOBRIS ASSESSMENT , 1996 .

[35]  M. Depledge,et al.  Would You Be Happier Living in a Greener Urban Area? A Fixed-Effects Analysis of Panel Data , 2013, Psychological science.

[36]  P. Groenewegen,et al.  Green space as a buffer between stressful life events and health. , 2010, Social science & medicine.

[37]  J. Wolch,et al.  Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities ‘just green enough’ , 2014 .

[38]  Affairs Population.  World Urbanization Prospects: The Revision, Highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/352). , 2014 .

[39]  R. Simons,et al.  Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments , 1991 .

[40]  Modellierung der Erreichbarkeit öffentlicher Apotheken: Untersuchung zum regionalen Versorgungsgrad mit Dienstleistungen der Grundversorgung , 2013 .

[41]  Philip Stein.  Measuring the Land , 2003 .

[42]  Nadja Kabisch,et al.  Green spaces of European cities revisited for 1990–2006 , 2013 .

[43]  D. Stanners,et al.  Europe's environment : the Dobrís assessment , 1995 .

[44]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Who benefits from access to green space? A case study from Sheffield, UK , 2007 .

[45]  Adriana Gamazo,et al.  EURYDICE (2013): Key data on teachers and school leaders in Europe. 2013 edition Eurydice report (Luxembourg Publications Office of the European Union) , 2013 .

[47]  Roy Haines-Young,et al.  Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES): Consultation on Version 4, August-December 2012 , 2013 .

[48]  C. Marcus,et al.  Essay: Healing gardens—places for nature in health care , 2006, The Lancet.

[49]  K. Grunewald,et al.  Assessment of ecosystem services at the national level in Germany—Illustration of the concept and the development of indicators by way of the example wood provision , 2016 .

[50]  G. Meinel,et al.  Land-use monitoring by topographic data analysis , 2013 .