Using a Service Lens to Better Understand Practices –and Vice Versa

[1]  Frank Teuteberg,et al.  Uncovering the Complexity of Care Networks – Towards a Taxonomy of Collaboration Complexity in Homecare , 2022, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[2]  T. Tuunanen,et al.  Information Technology-Supported value Co-Creation and Co-Destruction via social interaction and resource integration in service systems , 2022, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[3]  T. Greenhalgh,et al.  Why doesn’t integrated care work? Using Strong Structuration Theory to explain the limitations of an English case , 2021, Sociology of health & illness.

[4]  U. Westrup,et al.  Non-voluntary service interaction from a service logic perspective: children and value co-creation , 2020, Public Management Review.

[5]  B. Edvardsson,et al.  Service Ecosystem Design: Propositions, Process Model, and Future Research Agenda , 2020, Journal of Service Research.

[6]  Amalia de Götzen,et al.  Service design and participatory design: time to join forces? , 2020, PDC.

[7]  Andreas Hellström,et al.  Multi‐actor Resource Integration: A Service Approach in Public Management , 2020, British Journal of Management.

[8]  S. Hibbert,et al.  Customer boundary work to navigate institutional arrangements around service interactions: Exploring the case of telehealth , 2019, Journal of Business Research.

[9]  Mark S. Ackerman,et al.  Precarious Interventions , 2019, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction.

[10]  Krzysztof Z. Gajos,et al.  "I think we know more than our doctors" , 2019, Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact..

[11]  Helle Zinner Henriksen,et al.  Value positions viewed through the lens of automated decision-making: The case of social services , 2019, Gov. Inf. Q..

[12]  Neil Pollock,et al.  Method Matters in the Social Study of Technology: Investigating the Biographies of Artifacts and Practices , 2019, Science & Technology Studies.

[13]  Jean Damascène Mazimpaka,et al.  The public value of E-Government - A literature review , 2019, Gov. Inf. Q..

[14]  Jan Mendling,et al.  Conceptualizing smart service systems , 2017, Electronic Markets.

[15]  Yunan Chen,et al.  Navigating the Healthcare Service "Black Box" , 2018, Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact..

[16]  Naveena Karusala,et al.  Bridging Disconnected Knowledges for Community Health , 2018, Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact..

[17]  Minna Isomursu,et al.  ‘Worksome but Rewarding’ –Stakeholder Perceptions on Value in Collaborative Design Work , 2018, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[18]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  From Object-Oriented to Fluid Ontology: a Case Study of the Materiality of Design Work in Agile Software Development , 2018, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[19]  Ofer Arazy,et al.  Placing Value on Community Co-creations: A Study of a Video Game 'Modding' Community , 2017, CSCW.

[20]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Tying Knots: Participatory Infrastructuring at Work , 2017, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[21]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Special Section Introduction - Online Community as Space for Knowledge Flows , 2016, Inf. Syst. Res..

[22]  Babak A. Farshchian,et al.  Stakeholder Attitudes Toward and Values Embedded in a Sensor-Enhanced Personal Emergency Response System , 2016, Interact. Comput..

[23]  Mikkel Baun Kjærgaard,et al.  Accounting for the Invisible Work of Hospital Orderlies: Designing for Local and Global Coordination , 2016, CSCW.

[24]  Volker Wulf,et al.  Practice-based CSCW Research: ECSCW bridging across the Atlantic , 2016, CSCW Companion.

[25]  Nervo Verdezoto,et al.  Beyond the Individual: The Contextual Wheel of Practice as a Research Framework for Sustainable HCI , 2015, CHI.

[26]  Tawfiq Ammari,et al.  Networked Empowerment on Facebook Groups for Parents of Children with Special Needs , 2015, CHI.

[27]  Helena Karasti,et al.  Infrastructuring in participatory design , 2014, PDC.

[28]  M. Akaka,et al.  Technology as an operant resource in service (eco)systems , 2014, Inf. Syst. E Bus. Manag..

[29]  Liam J. Bannon,et al.  The turn to practice in HCI: towards a research agenda , 2014, CHI.

[30]  Trisha Greenhalgh,et al.  The Day-to-Day Co-Production of Ageing in Place , 2014, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[31]  S. Baron,et al.  Service(s) Marketing Research: Developments and Directions , 2014 .

[32]  Jacki O'Neill,et al.  Being a turker , 2014, CSCW.

[33]  Claus Bossen,et al.  Boundary-Object Trimming: On the Invisibility of Medical Secretaries’ Care of Records in Healthcare Infrastructures , 2014, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[34]  R. McConkey,et al.  Promoting social inclusion through Unified Sports for youth with intellectual disabilities: a five-nation study. , 2013, Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR.

[35]  Daan van Eijk,et al.  Practices as a unit of design , 2013, ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact..

[36]  Amy L. Ostrom,et al.  Transformative Service Research: An Agenda for the Future , 2013 .

[37]  Kjeld Schmidt,et al.  Constructing CSCW: The First Quarter Century , 2013, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[38]  Eric Monteiro,et al.  From Artefacts to Infrastructures , 2013, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[39]  G. Fitzpatrick,et al.  A Review of 25 Years of CSCW Research in Healthcare: Contributions, Challenges and Future Agendas , 2013, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[40]  Michael S. Bernstein,et al.  The future of crowd work , 2013, CSCW.

[41]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Value cocreation and service systems (Re)formation: A service ecosystems view , 2012 .

[42]  Claus Bossen,et al.  Impediments to user gains: experiences from a critical participatory design project , 2012, PDC '12.

[43]  Carol Kelleher,et al.  Practices and experiences: challenges and opportunities for value research , 2012 .

[44]  Linda D. Peters,et al.  Resource integration , 2012 .

[45]  Mika Pantzar,et al.  The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and how it Changes , 2012 .

[46]  Jacky Swan,et al.  Understanding the Role of Objects in Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[47]  Bill Doolin,et al.  Sociomateriality and boundary objects in information systems development , 2012, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[48]  Megan Barr,et al.  Perceived barriers and facilitators to physical activity for children with disability: a systematic review , 2011, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[49]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Theorizing Practice and Practicing Theory , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[50]  A. Bakker,et al.  Boundary Crossing and Boundary Objects , 2011 .

[51]  Deana D. Pennington,et al.  Bridging the Disciplinary Divide: Co-Creating Research Ideas in eScience Teams , 2011, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[52]  Mari Ervasti,et al.  Understanding human values in adopting new technology - A case study and methodological discussion , 2011, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[53]  Kaj Storbacka,et al.  Practices as Markets: Value Co-Creation in E-Invoicing , 2010 .

[54]  S. L. Star,et al.  This is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept , 2010 .

[55]  Patricia Minnes,et al.  Participation of Children with and without Disabilities in Social, Recreational and Leisure Activities , 2010 .

[56]  Davide Nicolini.  Zooming In and Out: Studying Practices by Switching Theoretical Lenses and Trailing Connections , 2009 .

[57]  Susan Wyche,et al.  Values as lived experience: evolving value sensitive design in support of value discovery , 2009, CHI.

[58]  Irvine Lapsley,et al.  1new Public Management: The Cruellest Invention of the Human Spirit? , 2009 .

[59]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution , 2008 .

[60]  Loretta Secco,et al.  Living in a World of Our Own: The Experience of Parents Who Have a Child With Autism , 2008, Qualitative health research.

[61]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  On value and value co-creation: A service systems and service logic perspective , 2008 .

[62]  V. Morrow.  Ethical dilemmas in research with children and young people about their social environments , 2008 .

[63]  Jessica K. Miller,et al.  Value tensions in design: the value sensitive design, development, and appropriation of a corporation's groupware system , 2007, GROUP.

[64]  Charlotte P. Lee,et al.  Boundary Negotiating Artifacts: Unbinding the Routine of Boundary Objects and Embracing Chaos in Collaborative Work , 2007, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[65]  Gilbert Cockton,et al.  Designing worth is worth designing , 2006, NordiCHI '06.

[66]  R. Suddaby.  From the Editors: What Grounded Theory is Not , 2006 .

[67]  Emmanuelle Vaast,et al.  The Emergence of Boundary Spanning Competence in Practice: Implications for Implementation and Use of Information Systems , 2005, MIS Q..

[68]  E. Shove,et al.  Consumers, Producers and Practices , 2005 .

[69]  Jill Porter,et al.  Interviewing Children and Young People with Learning Disabilities , 2004 .

[70]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[71]  C. Lovelock,et al.  Whither Services Marketing? , 2004 .

[72]  Jean Ann Summers,et al.  Parents' Perceptions of Advocacy Activities and Their Impact on Family Quality of Life , 2004 .

[73]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing , 2004 .

[74]  C. Milligan,et al.  Out of the shadows: exploring contemporary geographies of voluntarism , 2003 .

[75]  Andreas Reckwitz.  Toward a Theory of Social Practices , 2002 .

[76]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[77]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Value-sensitive design , 1996, INTR.

[78]  Karen Ruhleder,et al.  Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[79]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[80]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Groupware and social dynamics: eight challenges for developers , 1994, CACM.

[81]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[82]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic , 2016 .

[83]  H. Dickinson,et al.  Predictors of participation of adolescents with cerebral palsy: A European multi-centre longitudinal study , 2015, Research in developmental disabilities.

[84]  B. Edvardsson,et al.  Expanding understanding of service exchange and value co-creation: a social construction approach , 2011 .

[85]  A Bagley,et al.  Family needs of parents of children and youth with cerebral palsy. , 2010, Child: care, health and development.

[86]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Why “service”? , 2008 .

[87]  Michael Oliver,et al.  The Politics of Disablement , 1990 .

[88]  V. Braun,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Qualitative Research in Psychology Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology , 2022 .