The Culture for Open Innovation Dynamics

Culture, in its various forms, has always been a critical driver of innovation. This paper focuses on generating some insights into the role of “culture for open innovation dynamics”. First, because the requirement to understand culture, which can control open innovation complexity, has been augmented, we want to answer the following research question in this study: How can we define or organize “culture for open innovation dynamics”, which can motivate open innovation dynamics, and control open innovation complexity? Second, we propose a concept model of culture for open innovation dynamics by reviewing the literature on the culture of firms in terms of their traits, organization, static innovation, and dynamic aspects regarding their innovation in entrepreneurship, and we validate said model through an indirect social experiment using the research results of 23 Special Issue papers. Third, the concept model of culture for open innovation dynamics is explained as the interaction between three different entrepreneurship dimensions: Entrepreneurship of novice entrepreneurs, intrapreneurship of employees of an existing firm, and organizational entrepreneurship by the firm itself. According to the balance of three sub-entrepreneurship types, culture for open innovation dynamics can have different aspects, namely, entrepreneurship leading culture for open innovation dynamics, intrapreneurship leading culture for open innovation dynamics, or organizational entrepreneurship leading culture for open innovation dynamics. This paper helps organizations and entrepreneurs to better understand the role that culture plays in boosting open innovation dynamics.

[1]  Richard A. Peterson,et al.  Entrepreneurship in Organizations: Evidence from the Popular Music Industry , 1971 .

[2]  R. Katz,et al.  Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R & D Project Groups , 1982 .

[3]  Ann Swidler CULTURE IN ACTION: SYMBOLS AND STRATEGIES* , 1986 .

[4]  J. Barney,et al.  Organizational Culture: Can It Be a Source of Sustained Competitive Advantage? , 1986 .

[5]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Entrepreneurship Through Social Networks , 1986 .

[6]  W. Gartner “Who Is an Entrepreneur?” Is the Wrong Question , 1988 .

[7]  John Bulloch,et al.  ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND DEVELOPMENT , 1988 .

[8]  D. Kuratko,et al.  Developing an Intrapreneurial Assessment Instrument for an Effective Corporate Entrepreneurial Environment , 1990 .

[9]  J. Farley,et al.  Corporate Culture, Customer Orientation, and Innovativeness in Japanese Firms: A Quadrad Analysis , 1993 .

[10]  B. Bass,et al.  Transformational Leadership And Organizational Culture , 1993 .

[11]  C. Baden‐Fuller,et al.  Creating corporate entrepreneurship , 1994 .

[12]  C. Moorman Organizational Market Information Processes: Cultural Antecedents and New Product Outcomes , 1995 .

[13]  Jennifer A. Chatman,et al.  Culture as social control: Corporations, cults, and commitment. , 1996 .

[14]  B. Mark Organizational culture. , 1996, Annual review of nursing research.

[15]  Paul DiMaggio Culture and cognition , 1997 .

[16]  Allen C. Bluedorn,et al.  The relationship between corporate entrepreneurship and strategic management , 1999 .

[17]  Stanislav D. Dobrev,et al.  Organizational Roles and Transitions to Entrepreneurship Организационные роли и переходы к предпринимательству , 2005 .

[18]  Shaker A. Zahra,et al.  The Antecedents and Consequences of Firm-Level Entrepreneurship: The State of the Field , 1999 .

[19]  E. Ostrom Collective action and the evolution of social norms , 2000, Journal of Economic Perspectives.

[20]  R. Hisrich,et al.  Intrapreneurship: Construct refinement and cross-cultural validation , 2001 .

[21]  Jesper B. Sørensen The Strength of Corporate Culture and the Reliability of Firm Performance , 2002 .

[22]  Bostjan Antoncic,et al.  Clarifying the intrapreneurship concept , 2003 .

[23]  Shaker A. Zahra,et al.  Emerging Issues in Corporate Entrepreneurship , 2003 .

[24]  S. Shane,et al.  Opportunities and Entrepreneurship , 2003 .

[25]  Firm-level Disclosures and the Relative Roles of Culture and Legal Origin , 2003 .

[26]  D. D. Hartog,et al.  High performance work systems, organisational culture and firm effectiveness , 2004 .

[27]  K. Kyriakopoulos,et al.  The impact of cooperative structure and firm culture on market orientation and performance , 2004 .

[28]  R. Rumelt Theory, Strategy, and Entrepreneurship , 2005 .

[29]  Jens Frøslev Christensen,et al.  The industrial dynamics of Open Innovation—Evidence from the transformation of consumer electronics , 2005 .

[30]  T. Stank,et al.  Linking firm culture and orientation to supply chain success , 2005 .

[31]  J. West,et al.  Challenges of Open Innovation: The Paradox of Firm Investment in Open-Source Software , 2006 .

[32]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: A New Paradigm for Understanding Industrial Innovation , 2006 .

[33]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Institutional Entrepreneurship in Mature Fields: The Big Five Accounting Firms , 2006 .

[34]  Victoria Johnson,et al.  What Is Organizational Imprinting? Cultural Entrepreneurship in the Founding of the Paris Opera1 , 2007, American Journal of Sociology.

[35]  Michael J. Lippitz,et al.  The Four Models of Corporate Entrepreneurship , 2007 .

[36]  Benyamin Lichtenstein Entrepreneurship as Emergence , 2008 .

[37]  P. Saviotti,et al.  Micro and macro dynamics: Industry life cycles, inter-sector coordination and aggregate growth , 2008 .

[38]  Jeremy Galbreath,et al.  Drivers of Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role of Formal Strategic Planning and Firm Culture , 2009 .

[39]  Adam M. Grant,et al.  Good soldiers and good actors: prosocial and impression management motives as interactive predictors of affiliative citizenship behaviors. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[40]  R. Ireland,et al.  Conceptualizing Corporate Entrepreneurship Strategy , 2009 .

[41]  O. Gassmann,et al.  The Future of Open Innovation , 2010 .

[42]  Jens Leker,et al.  Open and closed innovation - different innovation cultures for different strategies , 2010, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[43]  Paul Tracey,et al.  Bridging Institutional Entrepreneurship and the Creation of New Organizational Forms: A Multilevel Model , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[44]  Jacob Torfing,et al.  Enhancing Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector , 2011 .

[45]  S. Parker,et al.  Intrapreneurship or Entrepreneurship? , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[46]  John Zimmerman Corporate Entrepreneurship At GE And Intel , 2011 .

[47]  Tan Yigitcanlar,et al.  A micro-level indexing model for assessing urbanecosystem sustainability , 2012 .

[48]  John Fender,et al.  Altruism and Economics , 2012 .

[49]  How to Balance Open and Closed Innovation: Strategy and Culture as Influencing Factors , 2013 .

[50]  R. A. Cooke,et al.  Firm culture and performance: intensity's effects and limits , 2013 .

[51]  Namgyoo K. Park,et al.  How Do Mobility Direction and Human Assets of Mobile Engineers Affect Joint Knowledge Creation after M&As? , 2019, Sustainability.

[52]  Philip Cooke,et al.  Green governance and green clusters: regional & national policies for the climate change challenge of Central & Eastern Europe , 2015 .

[53]  J. Yun How do we conquer the growth limits of capitalism? Schumpeterian Dynamics of Open Innovation , 2015 .

[54]  JinHyo Joseph Yun,et al.  Not Deep Learning but Autonomous Learning of Open Innovation for Sustainable Artificial Intelligence , 2016 .

[55]  Kwangho Jung,et al.  Brand relationships and risk: influence of risk avoidance and gender on brand consumption , 2016 .

[56]  Maha Mohammed Yusr Innovation capability and its role in enhancing the relationship between TQM practices and innovation performance , 2016 .

[57]  JinHyo Joseph Yun,et al.  How User Entrepreneurs Succeed: The Role of Entrepreneur’s Caliber and Networking Ability in Korean User Entrepreneurship , 2016 .

[58]  'Open Innovation' and 'Triple Helix' Models of Innovation: Can Synergy in Innovation Systems Be Measured? , 2016 .

[59]  JinHyo Joseph Yun,et al.  The philosophy of “open innovation”: Historical development of the philosophy of open innovation and its reflection from Taoism , 2016 .

[60]  Kyungbae Park,et al.  Dynamics from open innovation to evolutionary change , 2016 .

[61]  P. Cooke A ground-up “Quaternary” innovation strategy for South Korea using entrepreneurial ecosystem platforms , 2017, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity.

[62]  Tindara Abbate,et al.  Overcoming cultural barriers in open innovation processes through intermediaries: a theoretical framework , 2017 .

[63]  Philip Cooke,et al.  Complex spaces: global innovation networks & territorial innovation systems in information & communication technologies , 2017 .

[64]  A. Egbetokun,et al.  Innovation systems research: an agenda for developing countries , 2017 .

[65]  D. Dougherty Taking advantage of emergence for complex innovation eco-systems , 2017 .

[66]  Rogério Cid Bastos,et al.  Sustainable development of smart cities: a systematic review of the literature , 2017 .

[67]  TaeSun Kim Identifying Stakeholders and Interactions in the Dementia Café in Seongju through Empathic Service Design Approaches , 2018, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity.

[68]  Fabio Bento,et al.  Complexity in the oil and gas industry: a study into exploration and exploitation in integrated operations , 2018 .

[69]  Antonio Messineo,et al.  How can life cycle thinking support sustainability of buildings? Investigating life cycle assessment applications for energy efficiency and environmental performance , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[70]  Germà Coenders,et al.  Marketing Innovation and New Product Portfolios. A Compositional Approach , 2018, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity.

[71]  M. Mehdizadeh,et al.  Competitive Advantage and Its Impact on New Product Development Strategy (Case Study: Toos Nirro Technical Firm) , 2018 .

[72]  M. Do,et al.  The Socio-Economic Benefits of Sharing Economy: Colleague-Based Carpooling Service in Korea , 2018, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity.

[73]  Minhwa Lee,et al.  How to Respond to the Fourth Industrial Revolution, or the Second Information Technology Revolution? Dynamic New Combinations between Technology, Market, and Society through Open Innovation , 2018, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity.

[74]  Valentina della Corte,et al.  Innovation through Coopetition: Future Directions and New Challenges , 2018, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity.

[75]  Tan Yigitcanlar,et al.  Knowledge-based, smart and sustainable cities: a provocation for a conceptual framework , 2018 .

[76]  Yu Wang,et al.  A Model and Empirical Study on the User’s Continuance Intention in Online China Brand Communities Based on Customer-Perceived Benefits , 2018, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity.

[77]  B. Becker,et al.  Open innovation concept: integrating universities and business in digital age , 2018 .

[78]  Eungdo Kim,et al.  Evaluating Determinant Priority of License Fee in Biotech Industry , 2018, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity.

[79]  D. Matricano The State of the Art of Open Innovation Culture , 2018, Exploring the Culture of Open Innovation.

[80]  In Search of the Origin of an ‘Open Innovation’ Culture , 2018, Exploring the Culture of Open Innovation.

[81]  J. Yun,et al.  How Does a Social Open Innovation Succeed? Learning from Burro Battery and Grassroots Innovation Festival of India , 2019, Science, Technology and Society.

[82]  Mario Tani,et al.  The System Thinking Perspective in the Open-Innovation Research: A Systematic Review , 2018, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity.

[83]  L. Edvinsson The Culture of Open Innovation – A New Twilight Zone? , 2018, Exploring the Culture of Open Innovation.

[84]  J. Yun,et al.  Entrepreneurial cyclical dynamics of open innovation , 2018, Journal of evolutionary economics.

[85]  Tan Yigitcanlar,et al.  Towards a sustainable industrial ecology: Implementation of a novel approach in the performance evaluation of Italian regions , 2018 .

[86]  Minhwa Lee,et al.  Smart City 4.0 from the Perspective of Open Innovation , 2019, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity.

[87]  Jaewook Yoo,et al.  Ambidexterity in External Knowledge Search Strategies and Innovation Performance: Mediating Role of Balanced Innovation and Moderating Role of Absorptive Capacity , 2019, Sustainability.

[88]  S. Choi,et al.  The Effect of Innovation Capability on Business Performance: A Focus on IT and Business Service Companies , 2019, Sustainability.

[89]  Yanwei Li,et al.  Research on Industrial Policy from the Perspective of Demand-Side Open Innovation—A Case Study of Shenzhen New Energy Vehicle Industry , 2019, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity.

[90]  Valentina della Corte,et al.  Sustainable Tourism in the Open Innovation Realm: A Bibliometric Analysis , 2019, Sustainability.

[91]  J. Yun,et al.  Collective Intelligence: An Emerging World in Open Innovation , 2019, Sustainability.

[92]  Kwangho Jung,et al.  Trendsetting, Cultural Awareness, Cultural Receptivity, and Future Orientation among the Young Generation of Chinese College Students: Trendsetters Critically Matter , 2019, Sustainability.

[93]  Tan Yigitcanlar,et al.  The making of smart cities: Are Songdo, Masdar, Amsterdam, San Francisco and Brisbane the best we could build? , 2019, Land Use Policy.

[94]  Sun-young Park,et al.  Bridging the Gap in the Technology Commercialization Process: Using a Three-Stage Technology–Product–Market Model , 2019, Sustainability.

[95]  Younghoon Kang,et al.  Relations between Innovation and Firm Performance of Manufacturing Firms in Southeast Asian Emerging Markets: Empirical Evidence from Indonesia, Malaysia, and Vietnam , 2019 .

[96]  H. Park,et al.  Efficiency Analysis of Zinc Refining Companies , 2019 .

[97]  M. Yan,et al.  Exploring the Enablers of Strategic Orientation for Technology-Driven Business Innovation Ecosystems , 2019, Sustainability.

[98]  Efficiency Analysis of East Asian Zinc Smelters and the Effects of Capacity and Bonus Zinc on Efficiency , 2019, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity.

[99]  S. Eom,et al.  The Managerial Dimension of Open Data Success: Focusing on the Open Data Initiatives in Korean Local Governments , 2019, Sustainability.

[100]  Jun-Na Jin,et al.  From the Host to the Home Country, the International Upgradation of EMNEs in Sustainability Industries—The Case of a Chinese PV Company , 2019, Sustainability.

[101]  Jung‐Dong Park,et al.  How Social Entrepreneurs’ Value Orientation Affects the Performance of Social Enterprises in Korea: The Mediating Effect of Social Entrepreneurship , 2019, Sustainability.

[102]  Zheng Liu,et al.  The Sustainable Development of Land-lost Peasants’ Citizenization: A Case Study of Dongbang Town, China , 2019, Sustainability.

[103]  JinHyo Joseph Yun,et al.  Open Innovation and Serial Entrepreneurs , 2019, Sustainability.

[104]  Kamruzzaman,et al.  Disruptive Impacts of Automated Driving Systems on the Built Environment and Land Use: An Urban Planner’s Perspective , 2019, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity.

[105]  J. Yun,et al.  Micro- and Macro-Dynamics of Open Innovation with a Quadruple-Helix Model , 2019, Sustainability.

[106]  Eungdo Kim,et al.  The Influence of a Firm’s Capability and Dyadic Relationship of the Knowledge Base on Ambidextrous Innovation in Biopharmaceutical M&As , 2019, Sustainability.

[107]  Junic Kim,et al.  Platform Growth Model: The Four Stages of Growth Model , 2019, Sustainability.

[108]  Jeonghwa Lee,et al.  The Transition of Samsung Electronics through Its M&A with Harman International , 2019, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity.

[109]  Feiran Dong,et al.  Board Power Hierarchy, Corporate Mission, and Green Performance , 2019, Sustainability.

[110]  Junic Kim,et al.  The Effects of Entrepreneurial Orientation and Environmental Uncertainty on Korean Technology Firms’ R&D Investment , 2019, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity.

[111]  L. Mei,et al.  Structural Holes in the Multi-Sided Market: A Market Allocation Structure Analysis of China’s Car-Hailing Platform in the Context of Open Innovation , 2019, Sustainability.

[112]  J. Igartua,et al.  Implementing Open Innovation in Research and Technology Organisations: Approaches and Impact , 2019 .

[113]  Doh Kyoum Shin,et al.  Factors Influencing Matching of Ride-Hailing Service Using Machine Learning Method , 2019, Sustainability.

[114]  TaeSun Kim Factors Influencing Usability of Rehabilitation Robotic Devices for Lower Limbs , 2020 .

[115]  Joo-Yeon Park,et al.  How Does Technology Startups Increase Innovative Performance? The Study of Technology Startups on Innovation Focusing on Employment Change in Korea , 2020, Sustainability.

[116]  K. Desouza,et al.  Contributions and Risks of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Building Smarter Cities: Insights from a Systematic Review of the Literature , 2020, Energies.

[117]  J. Yun,et al.  Sustainability Condition of Open Innovation: Dynamic Growth of Alibaba from SME to Large Enterprise , 2020, Sustainability.

[118]  Min-Nan Chen,et al.  Social Trust and Open Innovation in an Informal Economy: The Emergence of Shenzhen Mobile Phone Industry , 2020, Sustainability.

[119]  Rashid Mehmood,et al.  Can Building “Artificially Intelligent Cities” Safeguard Humanity from Natural Disasters, Pandemics, and Other Catastrophes? An Urban Scholar’s Perspective , 2020, Sensors.