Neural substrates of perceptual integration during bistable object perception.

The way we perceive an object depends both on feedforward, bottom-up processing of its physical stimulus properties and on top-down factors such as attention, context, expectation, and task relevance. Here we compared neural activity elicited by varying perceptions of the same physical image--a bistable moving image in which perception spontaneously alternates between dissociated fragments and a single, unified object. A time-frequency analysis of EEG changes associated with the perceptual switch from object to fragment and vice versa revealed a greater decrease in alpha (8-12 Hz) accompanying the switch to object percept than to fragment percept. Recordings of event-related potentials elicited by irrelevant probes superimposed on the moving image revealed an enhanced positivity between 184 and 212 ms when the probes were contained within the boundaries of the perceived unitary object. The topography of the positivity (P2) in this latency range elicited by probes during object perception was distinct from the topography elicited by probes during fragment perception, suggesting that the neural processing of probes differed as a function of perceptual state. Two source localization algorithms estimated the neural generator of this object-related difference to lie in the lateral occipital cortex, a region long associated with object perception. These data suggest that perceived objects attract attention, incorporate visual elements occurring within their boundaries into unified object representations, and enhance the visual processing of elements occurring within their boundaries. Importantly, the perceived object in this case emerged as a function of the fluctuating perceptual state of the viewer.

[1]  M. Husain,et al.  The functional role of the inferior parietal lobe in the dorsal and ventral stream dichotomy , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  E. Donchin,et al.  Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[3]  Daniel Strüber,et al.  MEG alpha activity decrease reflects destabilization of multistable percepts. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[4]  Michael A. Pitts,et al.  Early Stages of Figure–Ground Segregation during Perception of the Face–Vase , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  Jean Lorenceau,et al.  Form constraints in motion binding , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  Thomas C. Toppino,et al.  Enduring interest in perceptual ambiguity: alternating views of reversible figures. , 2004, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  Joseph Krummenacher,et al.  Attention and Visual Object Segmentation , 2004 .

[8]  C. D. Darlington PSYCHOLOGY, GENETICS AND THE PROCESS OF HISTORY. , 1963, British journal of psychology.

[9]  Michael Bach,et al.  Bistable perception -- along the processing chain from ambiguous visual input to a stable percept. , 2006, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[10]  C. C. Wood,et al.  Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[11]  K. Heilman,et al.  Contributions of the parietal and frontal lobes to sustained attention and habituation , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Increases in alpha oscillatory power reflect an active retinotopic mechanism for distracter suppression during sustained visuospatial attention. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  D. Simons,et al.  Do New Objects Capture Attention? , 2005, Psychological science.

[14]  T. Kasai,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of attention-spreading in visual grouping , 2007, Neuroreport.

[15]  Tetsuko Kasai,et al.  Are objects the same as groups? ERP correlates of spatial attentional guidance by irrelevant feature similarity , 2011, Brain Research.

[16]  Ryota Kanai,et al.  Perceptual Alternation Induced by Visual Transients , 2005, Perception.

[17]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[18]  Wolf Singer,et al.  Neuronal Synchrony: A Versatile Code for the Definition of Relations? , 1999, Neuron.

[19]  Daniel Gembris,et al.  Top-down attentional processing enhances auditory evoked gamma band activity , 2003, Neuroreport.

[20]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Maintaining internal representations: the role of the human superior parietal lobe , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  J Jonides,et al.  Attentional capture by abrupt onsets: new perceptual objects or visual masking? , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  Barry D. Vaughan,et al.  Object-Based Visual Selection: Evidence From Perceptual Completion , 1998 .

[23]  I. Kovács,et al.  When the brain changes its mind: interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  Albert Gjedde,et al.  Cortical Sites of Sustained and Divided Attention in Normal Elderly Humans , 1997, NeuroImage.

[25]  W Singer,et al.  Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[26]  A. Torralba,et al.  The role of context in object recognition , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  B. Oken,et al.  Statistical issues concerning computerized analysis of brainwave topography , 1986, Annals of neurology.

[28]  S. R. Lehky Binocular rivalry is not chaotic , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  Maggie Shiffrar,et al.  The influence of terminators on motion integration across space , 1992, Vision Research.

[30]  J. Palva,et al.  Functional Roles of Alpha-Band Phase Synchronization in Local and Large-Scale Cortical Networks , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[31]  Michael A. Pitts,et al.  Early top-down influences on bistable perception revealed by event-related potentials , 2008, Brain and Cognition.

[32]  S. Anderson,et al.  Cortical oscillatory activity associated with the perception of illusory and real visual contours. , 2009, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[33]  M. Scherg Fundamentals if dipole source potential analysis , 1990 .

[34]  Victor A. F. Lamme,et al.  Contextual Modulation in Primary Visual Cortex , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  Tetsuko Kasai Attention-spreading Based on Hierarchical Spatial Representations for Connected Objects , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  Antígona Martínez,et al.  Spatial attention facilitates selection of illusory objects: Evidence from event-related brain potentials , 2007, Brain Research.

[37]  J. Lorenceau,et al.  Coupled dynamics of bistable distant motion displays. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[38]  F. Varela,et al.  Perception's shadow: long-distance synchronization of human brain activity , 1999, Nature.

[39]  Bradley S Gibson,et al.  Directing spatial attention within an object: altering the functional equivalence of shape descriptions. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  The Role of Spatial Attention in the Selection of Real and Illusory Objects , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  M. A. Parasido Brightness perception and filling-in , 1991 .

[42]  Ke Zhou,et al.  Cue Validity and Object-Based Attention , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[43]  N. Squires,et al.  Visual evoked potentials to illusory reversals of the necker cube. , 1988, Psychophysiology.

[44]  J. Duncan Selective attention and the organization of visual information. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[45]  M. Sarter,et al.  The cognitive neuroscience of sustained attention: where top-down meets bottom-up , 2001, Brain Research Reviews.

[46]  S. Edelman,et al.  Computational Theories of Object Recognition Edelman -computation and Object Recognition Ii Box 1. Structural Descriptions ~ 7~ Recognition by Components Varieties of Alignment Multidimensional Histograms Approximation in Feature Space , 2022 .

[47]  A. Borsellino,et al.  Reversal time distribution in the perception of visual ambiguous stimuli , 1972, Kybernetik.

[48]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Kanizsa subjective figures capture visual spatial attention: evidence from electrophysiological and behavioral data , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[49]  D. Simons,et al.  Moving and looming stimuli capture attention , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[50]  B. Scholl Objects and attention: the state of the art , 2001, Cognition.

[51]  Marlene Behrmann,et al.  Space-, object-, and feature-based attention interact to organize visual scenes , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[52]  Ahmet Ademoglu,et al.  Analysis of the electroencephalographic activity during the Necker cube reversals by means of the wavelet transform , 1998, Biological Cybernetics.

[53]  Paul Schrater,et al.  Shape perception reduces activity in human primary visual cortex , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[54]  Daniel Yoshor,et al.  Receptive fields in human visual cortex mapped with surface electrodes. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[55]  Shlomo Bentin,et al.  Attentional selection of relative SF mediates global versus local processing: evidence from EEG. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[56]  W. Kaiser,et al.  Challenging the anterior attentional system with a continuous performance task: a functional magnetic resonance imaging approach , 1998, European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience.

[57]  S. Edelman,et al.  Differential Processing of Objects under Various Viewing Conditions in the Human Lateral Occipital Complex , 1999, Neuron.

[58]  G. Romani,et al.  Auditory evoked magnetic fields and electric potentials , 1990 .

[59]  D. Heeger,et al.  Two Retinotopic Visual Areas in Human Lateral Occipital Cortex , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[60]  Pejman Sehatpour,et al.  Spatiotemporal dynamics of human object recognition processing: An integrated high-density electrical mapping and functional imaging study of “closure” processes , 2006, NeuroImage.

[61]  Rolf Nelson,et al.  When does grouping happen? , 2003, Acta psychologica.

[62]  R. Zemel,et al.  Object-Based Attention and Occlusion Evidence From Normal Participants and a Computational Model , 1998 .

[63]  R. von der Heydt,et al.  Analysis of the Context Integration Mechanisms Underlying Figure–Ground Organization in the Visual Cortex , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[64]  J. Pernier,et al.  Stimulus Specificity of Phase-Locked and Non-Phase-Locked 40 Hz Visual Responses in Human , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[65]  Harald Atmanspacher,et al.  Correlates of Perceptive Instabilities in Event-Related Potentials , 2004, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos.

[66]  Michael A. Pitts,et al.  Neural generators of ERPs linked with Necker cube reversals. , 2009, Psychophysiology.

[67]  Ankoor S. Shah,et al.  An oscillatory hierarchy controlling neuronal excitability and stimulus processing in the auditory cortex. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[68]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Early processing in the human lateral occipital complex is highly responsive to illusory contours but not to salient regions , 2009, The European journal of neuroscience.

[69]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Visual Perceptual Learning in Human Object Recognition Areas: A Repetition Priming Study Using High-Density Electrical Mapping , 2001, NeuroImage.

[70]  John J. Foxe,et al.  The Role of Alpha-Band Brain Oscillations as a Sensory Suppression Mechanism during Selective Attention , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[71]  E Başar,et al.  Multistable visual perception induces a slow positive EEG wave. , 1993, The International journal of neuroscience.

[72]  E Donchin,et al.  A metric for thought: a comparison of P300 latency and reaction time. , 1981, Science.

[73]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Oscillatory brain activity dissociates between associative stimulus content in a repetition priming task in the human EEG. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[74]  M. Stadler,et al.  Direction and frequency specific processing in the perception of long-range apparent movement , 1986, Vision Research.

[75]  Michael Bach,et al.  The Necker cube—an ambiguous figure disambiguated in early visual processing , 2005, Vision Research.

[76]  W. Klimesch EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis , 1999, Brain Research Reviews.

[77]  L. M. Ward,et al.  Synchronous neural oscillations and cognitive processes , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[78]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  α-Band Electroencephalographic Activity over Occipital Cortex Indexes Visuospatial Attention Bias and Predicts Visual Target Detection , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[79]  Christoph M. Michel,et al.  Electrical neuroimaging based on biophysical constraints , 2004, NeuroImage.

[80]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Activation Timecourse of Ventral Visual Stream Object-recognition Areas: High Density Electrical Mapping of Perceptual Closure Processes , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[81]  S. Luck,et al.  Attention-Related Modulation of Sensory-Evoked Brain Activity in a Visual Search Task , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[82]  I Kovács,et al.  A closed curve is much more than an incomplete one: effect of closure in figure-ground segmentation. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[83]  W. Klimesch,et al.  EEG alpha oscillations: The inhibition–timing hypothesis , 2007, Brain Research Reviews.

[84]  Victor A. F. Lamme The neurophysiology of figure-ground segregation in primary visual cortex , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[85]  Yi Chen,et al.  Encoding the identity and location of objects in human LOC , 2011, NeuroImage.

[86]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Human Brain Activity Related to the Perception of Spatial Features of Objects , 1999, NeuroImage.

[87]  Joana,et al.  Neuroimaging , 2002 .

[88]  J. Lorenceau,et al.  Magnetoencephalographic signatures of visual form and motion binding , 2011, Brain Research.

[89]  Ryuji Takeya,et al.  Time course of spatial and feature selective attention for partly-occluded objects , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[90]  S. Yantis,et al.  Common neural substrates for the control and effects of visual attention and perceptual bistability. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[91]  Anastasia V. Flevaris,et al.  Exogenous Spatial Attention Influences Figure-Ground Assignment , 2004 .

[92]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  Scene segmentation and attention in primate cortical areas V1 and V2. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[93]  Michael Bach,et al.  Discontinuous presentation of ambiguous figures: how interstimulus-interval durations affect reversal dynamics and ERPs. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[94]  Stephen Wallace,et al.  Figure and Ground , 1982 .

[95]  F. Qiu,et al.  Figure-ground mechanisms provide structure for selective attention , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[96]  P. Fries A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: neuronal communication through neuronal coherence , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[97]  M. Bar Visual objects in context , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[98]  Russell A. Epstein,et al.  Constructing scenes from objects in human occipitotemporal cortex , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[99]  A. Treisman,et al.  Perceiving visually presented objets: recognition, awareness, and modularity , 1998, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[100]  Michael A. Pitts,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of perceptual reversals for three different types of multistable images. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[101]  A. Norcia,et al.  Configural specificity of the lateral occipital cortex , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[102]  Michael Bach,et al.  Ambiguous Figures – What Happens in the Brain When Perception Changes But Not the Stimulus , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[103]  Daniel Strüber,et al.  Necker cube reversals during long-term EEG recordings: sub-bands of alpha activity. , 2006, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[104]  Ruth Kimchi,et al.  Automatic, stimulus-driven attentional capture by objecthood , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[105]  T. Egner,et al.  Cognitive control mechanisms resolve conflict through cortical amplification of task-relevant information , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[106]  G. Pourtois,et al.  Object representations for multiple visual categories overlap in lateral occipital and medial fusiform cortex. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[107]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  How parallel are the primate visual pathways? , 1993, Annual review of neuroscience.

[108]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Human Gamma Band Activity and Perception of a Gestalt , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[109]  Victor A. F. Lamme,et al.  Figure-ground activity in primary visual cortex is suppressed by anesthesia. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[110]  Michael Bach,et al.  Early neural activity in Necker-cube reversal: evidence for low-level processing of a gestalt phenomenon. , 2004, Psychophysiology.

[111]  O. Bertrand,et al.  Attention modulates gamma-band oscillations differently in the human lateral occipital cortex and fusiform gyrus. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[112]  J. Driver,et al.  Segmentation, attention and phenomenal visual objects , 2001, Cognition.

[113]  R. Rafal,et al.  Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[114]  O. Bertrand,et al.  Oscillatory gamma activity in humans: a possible role for object representation. , 2000, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[115]  H. Spekreijse,et al.  Event-related desynchronization during anticipatory attention for an upcoming stimulus: a comparative EEG/MEG study , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[116]  S. Grossberg,et al.  Neural dynamics of form perception: boundary completion, illusory figures, and neon color spreading. , 1985, Psychological review.

[117]  C. Hung,et al.  A functional circuitry for edge-induced brightness perception , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[118]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Oscillatory Alpha-Band Mechanisms and the Deployment of Spatial Attention to Anticipated Auditory and Visual Target Locations: Supramodal or Sensory-Specific Control Mechanisms? , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[119]  Marcus R. Watson,et al.  Extremely selective attention: eye-tracking studies of the dynamic allocation of attention to stimulus features in categorization. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[120]  R. Hari,et al.  Modulation of the Parieto-Occipital Alpha Rhythm during Object Detection , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[121]  Michael Bach,et al.  Ambiguous Figures and Binding: Eeg Frequency Modulations during Multistable Perception , 2022 .

[122]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The lateral occipital complex and its role in object recognition , 2001, Vision Research.

[123]  Maren Grigutsch,et al.  EEG oscillations and wavelet analysis , 2005 .

[124]  Tomer Carmel,et al.  Perceptual objects capture attention , 2009, Vision Research.

[125]  T. Horowitz,et al.  Attentional enhancement during multiple-object tracking , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[126]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Meaning and modality: influences of context, semantic memory organization, and perceptual predictability on picture processing. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[127]  J. Hochberg Figure-ground reversal as a function of visual satiation. , 1950 .

[128]  Bertrand Thirion,et al.  Perceptual alternations between unbound moving contours and bound shape motion engage a ventral/dorsal interplay. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[129]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Bistable Gestalts reduce activity in the whole of V1, not just the retinotopically predicted parts. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[130]  Jon Driver,et al.  Spreading of Visual Attention to Modally Versus Amodally Completed Regions , 1997 .

[131]  S. Yantis Stimulus-driven attentional capture and attentional control settings. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[132]  Stephen J. Anderson,et al.  The spatial distribution and temporal dynamics of brain regions activated during the perception of object and non-object patterns , 2007, NeuroImage.

[133]  Ehud Zohary,et al.  Beyond retinotopic mapping: the spatial representation of objects in the human lateral occipital complex. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[134]  W. D. Ross,et al.  Visual brain and visual perception: how does the cortex do perceptual grouping? , 1997, Trends in Neurosciences.

[135]  D. Sagi,et al.  Visual attention and perceptual grouping , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[136]  Simon Hanslmayr,et al.  EEG alpha oscillations in the preparation for global and local processing predict behavioral performance , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[137]  Thomas C. Toppino,et al.  Prime time: Fatigue and set effects in the perception of reversible figures , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[138]  E. Rolls,et al.  Scene perception: inferior temporal cortex neurons encode the positions of different objects in the scene , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.

[140]  T. Vilis,et al.  Face Inversion Reduces the Persistence of Global Form and Its Neural Correlates , 2011, PLoS ONE.

[141]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Impaired visual object recognition and dorsal/ventral stream interaction in schizophrenia. , 2002, Archives of general psychiatry.

[142]  Kalanit Grill-Spector,et al.  Object Recognition , 2008, Computer Vision.

[143]  Jon Driver,et al.  Lateral interactions between targets and flankers in low-level vision depend on attention to the flankers , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[144]  S. E. Watson,et al.  Object-based visual selective attention and perceptual organization , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[145]  R. Malach,et al.  Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[146]  Matthias Niemeier,et al.  A contralateral preference in the lateral occipital area: sensory and attentional mechanisms. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[147]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Multistable phenomena: changing views in perception , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[148]  D. Strüber,et al.  Reversal-rate dependent differences in the EEG gamma-band during multistable visual perception. , 2000, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[149]  Theodor Landis,et al.  Right parietal brain activity precedes perceptual alternation of bistable stimuli. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[150]  S. Bentin,et al.  Dissociated neural mechanisms for face detection and configural encoding: evidence from N170 and induced gamma-band oscillation effects. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[151]  Thomas C. Toppino,et al.  Selective adaptation with reversible figures: Don’t change that channel , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[152]  Fang Fang,et al.  Perceptual grouping and inverse fMRI activity patterns in human visual cortex. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[153]  G. V. Simpson,et al.  Anticipatory Biasing of Visuospatial Attention Indexed by Retinotopically Specific α-Bank Electroencephalography Increases over Occipital Cortex , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[154]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  Objects Are Highlighted by Spatial Attention , 2006 .

[155]  J. Maunsell,et al.  Anterior inferotemporal neurons of monkeys engaged in object recognition can be highly sensitive to object retinal position. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[156]  C. Summerfield,et al.  Expectation (and attention) in visual cognition , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[157]  Martin A. Riedmiller,et al.  Computational object recognition: a biologically motivated approach , 2009, Biological Cybernetics.

[158]  Thomas A Carlson,et al.  Perceptual benefits of objecthood. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[159]  A. Elithorn,et al.  CEREBRAL DOMINANCE IN REACTION TIME RESPONSES. , 1963, British journal of psychology.