Target motion predictions for pre-operative planning during needle-based interventions

During biopsies, breast tissue is subjected to displacement upon needle indentation, puncture, and penetration. Thus, accurate needle placement requires pre-operative predictions of the target motions. In this paper, we used ultrasound elastography measurements to non-invasively predict elastic properties of breast tissue phantoms. These properties were used in finite element (FE) models of indentation of breast soft tissue phantoms. To validate the model predictions of target motion, experimental measurements were carried out. Breast tissue phantoms with cubic and hemispherical geometries were manufactured and included materials with different elastic properties to represent skin, adipose tissue, and lesions. Ultrasound was used to track the displacement of the target (i.e., the simulated lesion) during indentation. The FE model predictions were compared with ultrasound measurements for cases with different boundary conditions and phantom geometry. Maximum errors between measured and predicted target motions were 12% and 3% for the fully supported and partially supported cubic phantoms at 6.0 mm indentation, respectively. Further, FE-based parameter sensitivity analysis indicated that increasing skin elastic modulus and reducing the target depth location increased the target motion. Our results indicate that with a priori knowledge about the geometry, boundary conditions, and linear elastic properties, indentation of breast tissue phantoms can be accurately predicted with FE models. FE models for pre-operative planning in combination with robotic needle insertions, could play a key role in improving lesion targeting for breast biopsies.

[1]  K J Macura,et al.  The importance of organ geometry and boundary constraints for planning of medical interventions. , 2009, Medical engineering & physics.

[2]  Assad A Oberai,et al.  Quantitative three-dimensional elasticity imaging from quasi-static deformation: a phantom study , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  Werner A Kaiser,et al.  MRI‐guided interventions of the breast , 2008, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[4]  J. Ophir,et al.  Elastography: A Quantitative Method for Imaging the Elasticity of Biological Tissues , 1991, Ultrasonic imaging.

[5]  Maud Marchal,et al.  Needle-tissue interaction modeling using ultrasound-based motion estimation: Phantom study , 2008, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[6]  Peter Kazanzides,et al.  Robotic assistance for ultrasound-guided prostate brachytherapy , 2008, Medical Image Anal..

[7]  Septimiu E. Salcudean,et al.  Interactive simulation of needle insertion models , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  Makoto Yamakawa,et al.  Tissue Elasticity Reconstruction Based on 3-Dimensional Finite-Element Model , 1999 .

[9]  R. Stock,et al.  Current topics in the treatment of prostate cancer with low-dose-rate brachytherapy. , 2010, The Urologic clinics of North America.

[10]  Richard G P Lopata,et al.  Comparison of one-dimensional and two-dimensional least-squares strain estimators for phased array displacement data. , 2009, Ultrasonic imaging.

[11]  Rajni V. Patel,et al.  Needle insertion into soft tissue: a survey. , 2007, Medical engineering & physics.

[12]  C. D. de Korte,et al.  Performance evaluation of methods for two-dimensional displacement and strain estimation using ultrasound radio frequency data. , 2009, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[13]  Allison M. Okamura,et al.  Modeling of Tool-Tissue Interactions for Computer-Based Surgical Simulation: A Literature Review , 2008, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[14]  Peter Kazanzides,et al.  Robotic Assistance for Ultrasound Guided Prostate Brachytherapy , 2007, MICCAI.

[15]  T. Helbich,et al.  Accuracy of ultrasound-guided, large-core needle breast biopsy , 2008, European Radiology.

[16]  Kenneth Y. Goldberg,et al.  Sensorless Motion Planning for Medical Needle Insertion in Deformable Tissues , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[17]  A. Jemal,et al.  Breast Cancer Statistics , 2013 .

[18]  E. Deurloo,et al.  Displacement of Breast Tissue and Needle Deviations During Stereotactic Procedures , 2001, Investigative radiology.

[19]  Bernard Bayle,et al.  Needle insertions modeling: Identifiability and limitations , 2007, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[20]  Rajni V. Patel,et al.  Minimization of needle deflection in robot‐assisted percutaneous therapy , 2007, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[21]  C T Lancée,et al.  Intravascular elasticity imaging using ultrasound: feasibility studies in phantoms. , 1997, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.