Uncertainty of measurement: what it is and what it should be.

Uncertainty of Measurement (UM) is defined [ISO15189 (3.17)] as “a parameter associated with the result of a measurand that characterises the dispersion of values.”2 In the clinical laboratory, similar information has long been available in the form of the Standard Deviation (SD) as a measure of imprecision. Thus the current discussion is about an old concept that is routinely measured and available from all accredited laboratories. What is therefore surprising is that UM is causing such anxiety and interest when it is so familiar to laboratory professionals. Perhaps some are concerned that highlighting UM issues may be interpreted by clinicians as a confession of previously undisclosed “laboratory error”. Although UM may not be a new idea for the laboratory, the present emphasis on the statistics tends to overlook the far greater problem of over-interpretation of results by clinicians. There are several areas where uncertainty in laboratory results can cause clinical problems. Examples are given below, as well as suggestions as to how guidelines on UM could be extended to provide useful information to clinical users.

[1]  G. Merlini,et al.  Biological variation of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide in healthy individuals. , 2003, Clinical chemistry.

[2]  C. Fraser Age-Related Changes in Laboratory Test Results , 1993, Drugs & aging.

[3]  W. Hölzel Intra-individual variation of analytes in serum from patients with chronic liver diseases. , 1987, Clinical chemistry.

[4]  Susan R. Wilson,et al.  Objective determination of appropriate reporting intervals , 2004, Annals of clinical biochemistry.

[5]  Jonathan A C Sterne,et al.  Systematic reviews in health care: Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis. , 2001, BMJ.

[6]  Callum G. Fraser,et al.  Biological Variation: From Principles to Practice , 2001 .

[7]  G. White,et al.  Uncertainty of measurement in quantitative medical testing: a laboratory implementation guide. , 2004, The Clinical biochemist. Reviews.

[8]  J. V. D. van den Ouweland,et al.  High intraindividual variation of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and amino-terminal proBNP in patients with stable chronic heart failure. , 2004, Clinical chemistry.

[9]  P. Phillips,et al.  Intraindividual variation of glycohemoglobin: implications for interpretation and analytical goals. , 1993, Clinical chemistry.

[10]  J. Queraltó,et al.  Reference Change Value for HbA1c in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus , 2000, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[11]  W. Hölzel Intra-individual variation of some analytes in serum of patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. , 1987, Clinical chemistry.

[12]  S. J. Smith,et al.  Estimating and minimizing effects of biologic sources of variation by relative range when measuring the mean of serum lipids and lipoproteins. , 1994, Clinical chemistry.