Drivers' visual behavior when using handheld and hands-free cell phones.

OBJECTIVE This study investigated driver distraction and how the use of handheld (HH), portable hands-free (PHF), and integrated hands-free (IHF) cell phones affected the visual behavior of motor vehicle drivers. METHOD A naturalistic driving study recorded 204 participating drivers using video cameras and vehicle sensors for an average of 31 days. A total of 1564 cell phone calls made and 844 text messages sent while driving were sampled and underwent a video review. Baselines were established by recording epochs prior to the cell phone interactions. Total eyes-off-road time (TEORT) was examined to assess the visual demands of cell phone subtasks while driving. Percent TEORT was reported and compared against the baseline. RESULTS Visual-manual subtasks performed on HH, PHF, and IHF cell phones were found to significantly increase drivers' mean percent TEORT. In contrast, conversing on an HH cell phone was found to significantly decrease drivers' mean percent TEORT, indicating that drivers looked at the forward roadway more often. No significant differences in percent TEORT were found for drivers conversing using PHF or IHF cell phones. The mean TEORT durations for visual-manual subtasks performed on an HH cell phone were significantly longer than the mean TEORT durations on either IHF or PHF cell phones. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS This research helps to further reinforce the distinction made between handheld and hands-free cell phone use in transportation distraction policy.

[1]  Feng Guo,et al.  The Risk of a Safety-Critical Event Associated With Mobile Device Use in Specific Driving Contexts , 2015, Traffic injury prevention.

[2]  Michael E Rakauskas,et al.  Effects of naturalistic cell phone conversations on driving performance. , 2004, Journal of safety research.

[3]  David L. Strayer,et al.  Driven to Distraction: Dual-Task Studies of Simulated Driving and Conversing on a Cellular Telephone , 2001, Psychological science.

[4]  M. A. Recarte,et al.  Mental workload while driving: effects on visual search, discrimination, and decision making. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[5]  Jeremy D Sudweeks,et al.  An Analysis of Driver Inattention Using a Case-Crossover Approach On 100-Car Data: Final Report , 2010 .

[6]  Richard J Hanowski,et al.  Comparing Handheld and Hands-free Cell Phone Usage Behaviors While Driving , 2014, Traffic injury prevention.

[7]  Moshe Eizenman,et al.  An on-road assessment of cognitive distraction: impacts on drivers' visual behavior and braking performance. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  Thomas A. Dingus,et al.  Driver distraction in long-haul truck drivers , 2005 .

[9]  Frank A. Drews,et al.  Passenger and Cell-Phone Conversations in Simulated Driving , 2004 .

[10]  John D Lee,et al.  Combining cognitive and visual distraction: less than the sum of its parts. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  Jeff K Caird,et al.  A meta-analysis of the effects of cell phones on driver performance. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  W. C. Maples,et al.  The effects of cell phone use on peripheral vision. , 2008, Optometry.

[13]  Thomas A. Dingus,et al.  The Impact of Driver Inattention on Near-Crash/Crash Risk: An Analysis Using the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study Data , 2006 .

[14]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Examining the Impact of Cell Phone Conversations on Driving Using Meta-Analytic Techniques , 2006, Hum. Factors.

[15]  Kevin Grove,et al.  Compensatory Behavior of Drivers When Conversing on a Cell Phone , 2014 .

[16]  Paul Atchley,et al.  Conversation Limits the Functional Field of View , 2004, Hum. Factors.