Teaching and Learning Cycles in a Constructivist Approach to Instruction.

Abstract This study attempts to analyze and synthesize the knowledge collected in the area of conceptual models used in teaching and learning during inquiry-based projects, and to propose a new frame for organizing the classroom interactions within a constructivist approach. The IMSTRA model consists in three general phases: Immersion, Structuring, Applying, each with two sub-phases that highlight specific roles for the teacher and the students. Two case studies, one for mathematics in grade 9 and another for science in grade 3, show how the model can be implemented in school, making inquiry realistic in regular classes. Beyond its initial purpose, the IMSTRA model proved to be a powerful tool in curriculum development, being used in producing mathematics textbooks, as well as in developing teaching courses for a long-distance teacher-training program.

[1]  John W. Renner,et al.  A THEORY OF INSTRUCTION: USING THE LEARNING-CYCLE TO TEACH SCIENCE CONCEPTS AND THINKING SKILLS , 1989 .

[2]  Griet Van Vaerenbergh,et al.  Learning To Solve Mathematical Application Problems: A Design Experiment with Fifth Graders. , 1999 .

[3]  Alfred North Whitehead.  The Aims of Education and Other Essays , 1967 .

[4]  Hedy Moscovici.  Secondary Science Emergency Permit Teachers' Perspectives on Power Relations in Their Environments and the Effects of These Powers on Classroom Practices. , 2003 .

[5]  F. Singer.  Beyond Conceptual Change: Using Representations to Integrate Domain-Specific Structural Models in Learning Mathematics , 2007 .

[6]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge , 2002 .

[7]  Leopold E. Klopfer,et al.  Toward the thinking curriculum: current cognitive research : 1989 yearbook of the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development , 1989 .

[8]  Sharon Bailin,et al.  Common misconceptions of critical thinking , 1999 .

[9]  Mihaela Singer.  From Cognitive Science to School Practice: Building the Bridge. , 2003 .

[10]  J. Forgas.  Language and Social Situations , 1985 .

[11]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[12]  London South,et al.  TOWARDS THE DEVELOPMENT OF A SELF-REGULATED MATHEMATICAL PROBLEM SOLVING MODEL , 2006 .

[13]  Paul Cobb,et al.  The emergence of mathematical meaning : interaction in classroom cultures , 2009 .

[14]  Mihaela Singer,et al.  Information structuring - a new way of perceiving the content of learning , 2001 .

[15]  Richard Dufour.  Building a Professional Learning Community. , 2003 .

[16]  J. Bruner.  The Role of Interaction Formats in Language Acquisition , 1985 .

[17]  Zoltan Dienes,et al.  An Experimental Study of Mathematics Learning , 1964 .

[18]  Task Dynamics in a College Biology Course for Prospective Elementary Teachers. , 2001 .

[19]  L. Shulman.  Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching , 1986 .

[20]  Stephen Lafer,et al.  The Interdisciplinary Teacher's Handbook: Integrated Teaching Across the Curriculum , 1996 .

[21]  Alan H. Schoenfeld,et al.  Mathematical Problem Solving , 1985 .

[22]  Anton E. Lawson,et al.  Sound and faulty arguments generated by preservice biology teachers when testing hypotheses involving unobservable entities , 2002 .

[23]  C. Geertz,et al.  The Interpretation of Cultures , 1973 .

[24]  Miriam Gamoran Sherin,et al.  Fostering communities of teachers as learners: disciplinary perspectives , 2004 .

[25]  E. Goffman.  Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience , 1974 .