Exogenous matrix precursors promote functional nerve regeneration across a 15‐mm gap within a silicone chamber in the rat

When silicone regeneration chambers are implanted empty, axonal regeneration fails if the interstump gap length is greater than 10 mm. Previous experiments using the 10‐mm gap model demonstrated that regeneration success correlated with the dimension and/or consistency of the naturally formed acellular fibrin matrix. Both spatial and temporal parameters of regeneration could be stimulated through modifications of the fibrin matrix by prefilling the chambers at the time of implantation either with phosphate‐buffered saline or plasma dialyzed against phosphate‐buffered saline. In the present experiments, similar modification of matrix formation was found to promote successful regeneration across 15‐mm and 20‐mm interstump gap lengths. In addition, prefilling 15‐mm‐gap chambers with dialyzed plasma resulted in a 3.5‐fold increase in the incidence of functional restitution detected at 8 weeks after implantation over the outcome with chambers prefilled with phosphate‐buffered saline.

[1]  S. Varon,et al.  Nerve regeneration chamber: evaluation of exogenous agents applied by multiple injections , 1987, Brain Research.

[2]  H. Friedrich,et al.  Evoked muscle action potentials from regenerated rat tibial and peroneal nerves: Synthetic versus autologous interfascicular grafts , 1987, Experimental Neurology.

[3]  G. Lundborg,et al.  Experimental hyperthyroidism stimulates axonal growth in mesothelial chambers , 1986, Experimental Neurology.

[4]  D. Barnes What makes nerves regenerate? , 1985, Science.

[5]  R. Coggeshall,et al.  Long-term patterns of axon regeneration in the sciatic nerve and its tributaries , 1985, Brain Research.

[6]  S. Varon,et al.  Modification of fibrin matrix formation in situ enhances nerve regeneration in silicone chambers , 1985, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[7]  E. Engvall,et al.  Neurite-promoting factors and extracellular matrix components accumulating in vivo within nerve regeneration chambers , 1984, Brain Research.

[8]  R. Sidman,et al.  Nerve Regeneration through Synthetic Biodegradable Nerve Guides: Regulation by the Target Organ , 1984, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[9]  G. Lundborg,et al.  Competence of nerve tissue as distal insert promoting nerve regeneration in a silicone chamber , 1984, Brain Research.

[10]  G. Lundborg,et al.  Temporal changes of neuronotrophic activities accumulating in vivo within nerve regeneration chambers , 1983, Experimental Neurology.

[11]  Göran Lundborg,et al.  Spatial‐Temporal progress of peripheral nerve regeneration within a silicone chamber: Parameters for a bioassay , 1983, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[12]  G. Lundborg,et al.  Axonal Growth in Mesothelial Chambers: The Role of the Distal Nerve Segment , 1983 .

[13]  P. Spencer,et al.  Tropism in nerve regeneration in vivo. Attraction of regenerating axons by diffusible factors derived from cells in distal nerve stumps of transected peripheral nerves , 1982, Brain Research.

[14]  Göran Lundborg,et al.  Nerve regeneration in silicone chambers: Influence of gap length and of distal stump components , 1982, Experimental Neurology.

[15]  A. Asbury SCHWANN CELL PROLIFERATION IN DEVELOPING MOUSE SCIATIC NERVE , 1967, The Journal of cell biology.