Effects of biogas digestion of clover/grass-leys, cover crops and crop residues on nitrogen cycle and crop yield in organic stockless farming systems

The trend towards specialization in conventional farming led to large agricultural areas in Germany and in Europe lacking livestock. Also stockless organic farming has increased during recent years. In organic farming clover/grass-ley (CG) provides nitrogen (N) to the whole cropping system via symbiotic N2 fixation and also controls certain weeds. A common practice in organic farming, when ruminants are not present, is to leave the biomass from CG in the field for their residual fertility effect. CG biomass, crop residues (CR) and cover crops (CC) represent a large unexploited energy potential. It could be used by anaerobic digestion to produce biogas. A field experiment was carried out by implementing a whole cropping system with a typical crop rotation for such farming systems on the research station Gladbacherhof from 2002 to 2005. The crop rotation consisted of six crops (two legumes and four non-legume crops). The aim was to evaluate whether the use of N could be improved by processing biomass from CG, CR and CC in a biogas digester and using the effluents as a fertilizer, compared to common practice. In the control treatment, represented by the usual stockless system, the CG, CR and CC biomass were left on the ground for green manure purposes. In the biogas systems these substrates were harvested for digestion in a biogas plant. The effluents of digestion were used to manure the non-legumes in the same crop rotation. Results indicate that digestion of CG, CR and CC can increase the crop dry matter and N yields and the N content of wheat grains in organic stockless systems. Harvesting and digestion of residues and their reallocation after digestion resulted in a better and more even allocation of N within the whole crop rotation, in a higher N input via N2 fixation and lower N losses due to emissions and probably in a higher N availability of digested manures in comparison to the same amounts of undigested biomass.

[1]  G.W.J. Giesen,et al.  CONVERSION FROM CONVENTIONAL TO BIOLOGICAL DAIRY FARMING: ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES AT FARM LEVEL , 1998 .

[2]  R. Unwin,et al.  Animal Manure on Grassland and Fodder Crops. Fertilizer or Waste? , 2011, Developments in Plant and Soil Sciences.

[3]  Rodney B. Thompson,et al.  Fate of nitrogen in cattle slurry following surface application or injection to grassland , 1987 .

[4]  M. van Noordwijk,et al.  Effects of spatial variability of nitrogen supply on environmentally acceptable nitrogen application rates to arable crops. , 1992 .

[5]  A. R. Stintzing,et al.  Surface Mulching with Red Clover in White Cabbage Production. Nitrogen Uptake, Ammonia Losses and the Residual Fertility Effect in Ryegrass , 2006 .

[6]  Weijun Zhou,et al.  THE FATE OF NITROGEN FROM 15N‐LABELED STRAW AND GREEN MANURE IN SOIL‐CROP‐DOMESTIC ANIMAL SYSTEMS , 1994 .

[7]  Paolo Benincasa,et al.  Anaerobically digested crop material for improved nitrogen efficiency in a crop rotation with beetroot (Beta vulgaris var. conditiva Alef.). , 2006 .

[8]  Günter Leithold,et al.  Effects of different manuring systems with and without biogas digestion on nitrogen cycle and crop yield in mixed organic dairy farming systems , 2008, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems.

[9]  G. Francis,et al.  Nitrogen mineralization, nitrate leaching and crop growth following cultivation of a temporary leguminous pasture in autumn and winter , 1992, Fertilizer research.

[10]  A. M. Vuuren,et al.  Effects of herbage composition and supplement feeding on the excretion of nitrogen in dung and urine by grazing dairy cows , 1987 .

[11]  L M Svensson,et al.  Biogas production from crop residues on a farm-scale level in Sweden: scale, choice of substrate and utilisation rate most important parameters for financial feasibility , 2006, Bioprocess and biosystems engineering.

[12]  K. Rasmussen,et al.  Influence of liquid manure application method on weed control in spring cereals , 2002 .

[13]  J. Petersen,et al.  Competition between weeds and spring wheat for 15N-labelled nitrogen applied in pig slurry , 2005 .

[14]  A. Kaske,et al.  Dinitrogen fixation and residue nitrogen of different managed legumes and nitrogen uptake of subsequent winter wheat [N2-Fixierung und residualer Stickstoff verschiedener Futterleguminosen sowie N-Aufnahme der Folgefrucht Winterweizen.] , 1999 .

[15]  Liliane Schmitt,et al.  Nährstoffmanagement im ökologischen Landbau - Ein Handbuch für Beratung und Praxis mit Anwendungs-CD , 2004 .

[16]  J. Olesen,et al.  Miljøeffekter og energibalancer ved energiproduktion på økologiske planteavlsbedrifter , 2004 .

[17]  P. Sørensen,et al.  The use of 15N labelling to study the turnover and utilization of ruminant manure N , 1998, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[18]  G. Torstensson.  NITROGEN DELIVERY AND UTILIZATION BY SUBSEQUENT CROPS AFTER INCORPORATION OF LEYS WITH DIFFERENT PLANT COMPOSITION , 1998 .

[19]  K. Möller,et al.  Impact and Interaction of Nitrogen and Phytophthora infestans as Yield-limiting and Yield-reducing Factors in Organic Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Crops , 2007, Potato Research.

[20]  N. Barrow.  Mineralization of nitrogen and sulphur from sheep faeces , 1961 .

[21]  H. Schüller.  Die CAL-Methode, eine neue Methode zur Bestimmung des pflanzenverfügbaren Phosphates in Böden , 1969 .

[22]  E. S. Jensen.  Seasonal patterns of growth and nitrogen fixation in field-grown pea , 1987, Plant and Soil.

[23]  P. Sørensen,et al.  Mineralization-immobilization and plant uptake of nitrogen as influenced by the spatial distribution of cattle slurry in soils of different texture , 1995, Plant and Soil.

[24]  Walter Stinner,et al.  Effects of different manuring systems with and without biogas digestion on soil mineral nitrogen content and on gaseous nitrogen losses (ammonia, nitrous oxides) , 2009 .