A comparison of upper limb amputees and patients with upper limb injuries using the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)

Purpose: To use the Disability of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scale to measure the disability of patients with upper limb amputation(s) and to compare these to other upper limb injuries. Method: All 274 patients over the age of 18 years presenting to Prince Henry Hospital in Sydney over a 4-year time frame were given the DASH assessment tool and asked to complete it under supervision of the Occupational Therapist. Results: Patients with brachial plexus injuries, Complex Regional Pain Syndrome and bilateral upper limb amputations demonstrated significantly higher levels of disability to patients with unilateral upper limb amputations. Partial hand amputees reported a higher level of disability than major unilateral upper limb amputees. For the 48 patients who completed pre- and post-treatment assessments, there was a significant improvement in their health status. Conclusions: Further research is required to understand the factors that affect a patient's perceptions of their disability. Perhaps the definitive nature of an amputation and the immediate involvement of highly skilled health professionals serve to assist patients to accept their injury and therefore minimizes the level of disability.

[1]  S. Naumann,et al.  The Prosthetic Upper Extremity Functional Index: development and reliability testing of a new functional status questionnaire for children who use upper extremity prostheses. , 2001, Journal of Hand Therapy.

[2]  Jeffrey Jutai,et al.  Evaluation of the validity of the prosthetic upper extremity functional index for children. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[3]  A. Heinemann,et al.  Development and measurement properties of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users’ Survey (OPUS): A comprehensive set of clinical outcome instruments , 2003, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[4]  C. Bombardier,et al.  Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG) , 1996, American journal of industrial medicine.

[5]  C. Bombardier,et al.  Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: The DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and head) , 1996 .

[6]  P. Halligan,et al.  Characterising phantom limb phenomena in upper limb amputees , 2001, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[7]  C. Bombardier,et al.  Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. , 2001, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

[8]  D. A. Cioffi,et al.  The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Outcomes Instruments: Normative Values from the General Population , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  F. Guillemin,et al.  Nottingham health profile: Reliability in a sample of 542 subjects with major amputation of one or several limbs , 2002, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[10]  James G Wright,et al.  Erratum: Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: The DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) (American Journal of Industrial Medicine (1996) 29:6 (602-608)) , 1996 .

[11]  L. Yardley,et al.  Engagement in activities revealing the body and psychosocial adjustment in adults with a trans-tibial prosthesis , 2002, Prosthetics and orthotics international.