Comparative study of the nature of chemical bonding of corrugated graphene on Ru(0001) and Rh(111) by electronic structure calculations

Abstract Recently, atomic resolved scanning tunneling microscopy investigations revealed that, depending on the substrate (Ni(111), Ru(0001), Ir(111), Pt(111), Rh(111)), graphene overlayer might present regular corrugation patterns, with periodically repeated units of a few nanometers. Variations of the interactions at the interface and the modulation of the local electronic properties are associated with the exact atomic arrangement of the carbon pairs with respect to the metal atoms of the substrate. Better understanding of the atomic structure and of the chemical bonding between graphene and the underlying transition metal is motivated by the fundamental scientific relevance of such systems, but it is also crucial in the perspective of possible applications. With the present work, we propose model systems for the two interfaces showing the most pronounced corrugation patterns, i.e. graphene/Ru(0001) and graphene/Rh(111). Our goal is to understand the nature of the interactions by means of electronic structure calculations based on Density Functional Theory. Our simulations qualitatively reproduce very well experimental results such as the STM topographies and the electrostatic potential maps, and quantitatively provide the closest agreement that has been published so far. The detailed analysis of the electronic structure at the interface highlights similarities and differences by changing the supporting transition metal. Our results point to a fundamental role of the hybridization between the π orbitals of graphene with the d band of the metal in determining the specific corrugation of the adsorbed monolayer. It is shown that differences in the response of the graphene electronic structure to the interaction with the metal can hinder the hybridization and lead to substantially different structures.

[1]  W. Kohn,et al.  Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects , 1965 .

[2]  Y. Dedkov,et al.  A possible source of spin-polarized electrons: The inert graphene/Ni(111) system , 2007, 0710.2514.

[3]  Yingkai Zhang,et al.  Comment on “Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple” , 1998 .

[4]  S. Marchini,et al.  Scanning tunneling microscopy of graphene on Ru(0001) , 2007 .

[5]  Marcella Iannuzzi,et al.  Nano-ice on boron nitride nanomesh: accessing proton disorder. , 2010, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.

[6]  T. Michely,et al.  Structural coherency of graphene on Ir(111). , 2008, Nano letters.

[7]  A. Cervellino,et al.  Graphene on Ru(0001): a 25 x 25 supercell. , 2008, Physical Review Letters.

[8]  Teter,et al.  Separable dual-space Gaussian pseudopotentials. , 1996, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[9]  N. Marzari,et al.  Maximally localized generalized Wannier functions for composite energy bands , 1997, cond-mat/9707145.

[10]  A. De Vita,et al.  Portrait of the potential barrier at metal-organic nanocontacts. , 2010, Nature materials.

[11]  Joost VandeVondele,et al.  Gaussian basis sets for accurate calculations on molecular systems in gas and condensed phases. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[12]  First principles study of the graphene/Ru(0001) interface. , 2009, The Journal of chemical physics.

[13]  M. Sasaki,et al.  Moiré contrast in the local tunneling barrier height images of monolayer graphite on Pt(111) , 2000 .

[14]  G. Wannier The Structure of Electronic Excitation Levels in Insulating Crystals , 1937 .

[15]  T. Michely,et al.  CORRIGENDUM: Growth of graphene on Ir(111) Growth of graphene on Ir(111) , 2009 .

[16]  M. J. Gladys,et al.  Chemical composition and reactivity of water on hexagonal Pt-group metal surfaces. , 2008, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[17]  Bin Wang,et al.  Comparison of electronic structure and template function of single-layer graphene and a hexagonal boron nitride nanomesh on Ru(0001) , 2009 .

[18]  F. Guinea,et al.  The electronic properties of graphene , 2007, Reviews of Modern Physics.

[19]  Theory of the scanning tunneling microscope , 1985 .

[20]  J. Flege,et al.  Epitaxial graphene on ruthenium. , 2008, Nature materials.

[21]  D. F. Ogletree,et al.  Integration of point-contact microscopy and atomic-force microscopy: Application to characterization of graphite/Pt(111) , 1999 .

[22]  T. Greber,et al.  Graphene on Ru(0001): a corrugated and chiral structure , 2009, 0908.4517.

[23]  W. Moritz,et al.  Structure determination of the coincidence phase of graphene on Ru(0001). , 2010, Physical review letters.

[24]  Michele Parrinello,et al.  A hybrid Gaussian and plane wave density functional scheme , 1997 .

[25]  S. Goedecker,et al.  Relativistic separable dual-space Gaussian pseudopotentials from H to Rn , 1998, cond-mat/9803286.

[26]  Matthias Schreck,et al.  Boron nitride nanomesh: functionality from a corrugated monolayer. , 2007, Angewandte Chemie.

[27]  T. Michely,et al.  STM investigation of single layer graphite structures produced on Pt(111) by hydrocarbon decomposition , 1992 .

[28]  U. Rüdiger,et al.  Rashba effect in the graphene/ni(111) system. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[29]  N. Gall’,et al.  Interaction of silver atoms with iridium and with a two-dimensional graphite film on iridium: Adsorption, desorption, and dissolution , 2004 .

[30]  S. Barja,et al.  Electronic and geometric corrugation of periodically rippled, self-nanostructured graphene epitaxially grown on Ru(0001) , 2010, 1005.1764.

[31]  Matthias Krack,et al.  Pseudopotentials for H to Kr optimized for gradient-corrected exchange-correlation functionals , 2005 .

[32]  M. Waldrop,et al.  Science 2.0. , 2008, Scientific American.

[33]  S. Marchini,et al.  Chemical origin of a graphene moiré overlayer on Ru(0001). , 2008, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[34]  Raffaele Resta,et al.  MACROSCOPIC POLARIZATION IN CRYSTALLINE DIELECTRICS : THE GEOMETRIC PHASE APPROACH , 1994 .

[35]  Michele Parrinello,et al.  Quickstep: Fast and accurate density functional calculations using a mixed Gaussian and plane waves approach , 2005, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[36]  B. Wang,et al.  Periodicity, work function and reactivity of graphene on Ru(0001) from first principles , 2010 .

[37]  J. Carrasco,et al.  Insight from first principles into the nature of the bonding between water molecules and 4d metal surfaces. , 2009, The Journal of chemical physics.

[38]  T. Greber,et al.  Corrugated single layer templates for molecules: From h-BN nanomesh to graphene based quantum dot arrays , 2010, 1006.5692.

[39]  C. Oshima,et al.  Atomic structure of monolayer graphite formed on Ni(111) , 1996 .

[40]  F. Guinea,et al.  Periodically rippled graphene: growth and spatially resolved electronic structure. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[41]  Andre K. Geim,et al.  The rise of graphene. , 2007, Nature materials.

[42]  B. Poelsema,et al.  Spatial mapping of the inverse decay length using scanning tunneling microscopy , 2008 .

[43]  F. Himpsel,et al.  Surface science lettersAdsorbate band dispersions for C on Ru(0001) , 1982 .

[44]  R. Schaub,et al.  Coupling epitaxy, chemical bonding, and work function at the local scale in transition metal-supported graphene. , 2010, ACS Nano.

[45]  D. Passerone,et al.  Probing the selectivity of a nanostructured surface by xenon adsorption. , 2010, Nanoscale.

[46]  SUPARNA DUTTASINHA,et al.  Graphene: Status and Prospects , 2009, Science.

[47]  Burke,et al.  Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. , 1996, Physical review letters.