A SmartDisability Framework: Enhancing User Interaction

This paper introduces the SmartDisability Framework to consider mappings between disability type, Range of Movement and interaction mediums to produce technology and task recommendations to enhance user interaction. The SmartDisability conceptual model (based on the familiar disability symbol) and extracts from the initial development stage of the Framework are presented. The Framework has been populated through the knowledge obtained from state of the art literature reviews of disability classification, Range of Movement, interaction mediums, 'off-the-shelf' technologies and tasks. The Framework was augmented by requirements elicitation results and a described usability evaluation involving a simulation of the SmartATRS smartphone system to control the Automated Transport and Retrieval System (ATRS). ATRS is a technically-advanced system that enables a powered wheelchair (powerchair) to autonomously dock onto a platform lift of a vehicle using an automated tailgate and a motorised driver's seat. The usability of touch and head-based interaction methods were measured using System Usability Scale (SUS) and NASA Task Load Index (NASA TLX) and demonstrated that fingers were more usable interaction method, as head tracking required a full range of neck movement. This SmartDisability Framework is anticipated to be validated through focus groups utilising fictional personas that involve experts from the domains of healthcare, computing and occupational therapy. The framework will be routed to exploitation through the development of a smartphone or web-based application.

[1]  Cristian Rusu,et al.  Developing a Touchscreen-based Domotic Tool for Users with Motor Disabilities , 2012, 2012 Ninth International Conference on Information Technology - New Generations.

[2]  Huseyin Dogan,et al.  SmartPowerchair: A pervasive system of systems , 2015, 2015 10th System of Systems Engineering Conference (SoSE).

[3]  Vangelis Metsis,et al.  Towards an evaluation framework for assistive environments , 2008, PETRA '08.

[4]  P. Asbell,et al.  Age-related cataract , 2005, The Lancet.

[5]  M. Kyllerman,et al.  DYSKINETIC CEREBRAL PALSY , 1982, Acta paediatrica Scandinavica.

[6]  Fethi A. Inan,et al.  ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGIES FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES: A SURVEY OF ACCESS AND USE IN TURKISH UNIVERSITIES , 2010 .

[7]  S. Z. Nagi Some conceptual issues in disability and rehabilitation , 1965 .

[8]  G. Chard International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health , 2004 .

[9]  G. Kielhofner Kielhofner's Research in Occupational Therapy : Methods of Inquiry for Enhancing Practice , 2006 .

[10]  Michael L Boninger,et al.  Recent trends in assistive technology for mobility , 2012, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[11]  Guy H. Walker,et al.  Human Factors Design and Evaluation Methods Review , 2004 .

[12]  A. Williams,et al.  International classification of functioning, disability, and health: ICF-CY World Health Organization , 2013 .

[13]  Michael Oliver,et al.  Fundamental Principles of Disability , 1996 .

[14]  N. Kostanjsek Use of The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a conceptual framework and common language for disability statistics and health information systems , 2011, BMC public health.

[15]  Guy H. Walker,et al.  Human Factors Methods: A Practical Guide for Engineering and Design , 2012 .

[16]  Keith Phalp,et al.  Evaluating the usability of an automated transport and retrieval system , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Pervasive and Embedded Computing and Communication Systems (PECCS).

[17]  Juan E. Tapiador,et al.  Evolution, Detection and Analysis of Malware for Smart Devices , 2014, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.